Cargando…

3D-printed Cu(2)O photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is an alternative to fossil fuel combustion involving the generation of renewable hydrogen without environmental pollution or greenhouse gas emissions. Cuprous oxide (Cu(2)O) is a promising semiconducting material for the simple reduction of hydrogen from w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Jinhyuck, Lee, Sanghyeon, Kim, Jung Hyun, Wajahat, Muhammad, Sim, Ho Hyung, Bae, Jongcheon, Pyo, Jaeyeon, Jahandar, Muhammad, Lim, Dong Chan, Seol, Seung Kwon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: RSC 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36133885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0na00512f
Descripción
Sumario:Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is an alternative to fossil fuel combustion involving the generation of renewable hydrogen without environmental pollution or greenhouse gas emissions. Cuprous oxide (Cu(2)O) is a promising semiconducting material for the simple reduction of hydrogen from water, in which the conduction band edge is slightly negative compared to the water reduction potential. However, the solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of Cu(2)O is lower than the theoretical value due to a short carrier-diffusion length under the effective light absorption depth. Thus, increasing light absorption in the electrode–electrolyte interfacial layer of a Cu(2)O photoelectrode can enhance PEC performance. In this study, a Cu(2)O 3D photoelectrode comprised of pyramid arrays was fabricated using a two-step method involving direct-ink-writing of graphene structures. This was followed by the electrodeposition of a Cu current-collecting layer and a p–n homojunction Cu(2)O photocatalyst layer onto the printed structures. The performance for PEC water splitting was enhanced by increasing the total light absorption area (A(a)) of the photoelectrode via controlling the electrode topography. The 3D photoelectrode (A(a) = 3.2 cm(2)) printed on the substrate area of 1.0 cm(2) exhibited a photocurrent (I(ph)) of −3.01 mA at 0.02 V (vs. RHE), which is approximately three times higher than that of a planar photoelectrode with an A(a) = 1.0 cm(2) (I(ph) = −0.91 mA). Our 3D printing strategy provides a flexible approach for the design and the fabrication of highly efficient PEC photoelectrodes.