Cargando…

A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Qiongzhen, Yao, Haixia, Wu, Jingxiang, Xu, Meiying, Xie, Hong, Wu, Dongjin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1
_version_ 1784777148349808640
author Li, Qiongzhen
Yao, Haixia
Wu, Jingxiang
Xu, Meiying
Xie, Hong
Wu, Dongjin
author_facet Li, Qiongzhen
Yao, Haixia
Wu, Jingxiang
Xu, Meiying
Xie, Hong
Wu, Dongjin
author_sort Li, Qiongzhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. METHODS: Eighty-four patients who received percutaneous LAAC were randomly placed into two groups, general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with either propofol-remifentanil-cisatracurium-neostigmine (group C) or propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex (group S). The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess recovery quality 6 h after surgery, and the time of spontaneous respiration, the time of consciousness recovery, the time of extubation, the duration in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and the adverse events after awakening were collected. RESULTS: Compared with the group C, the group S demonstrated significantly higher individual QoR-40 dimension scores, a significantly shorter recovery time for spontaneous respiration and consciousness, time of extubation, and duration in the PACU, and a lower incidence of transient hypoxemia, agitation, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. There was a non-significant trend for the length of stay in the hospital in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex provided better quality of recovery, shorter anaesthesia duration, and lower incidence of hypoxemia and agitation. Neuromuscular blockade and reversal using rocuronium and sugamadex is better than with cisatricurium and neostigmine on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Trial registration: chictr.org, ChiCTR2000031857. Registered on April 12, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9419309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94193092022-08-28 A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage Li, Qiongzhen Yao, Haixia Wu, Jingxiang Xu, Meiying Xie, Hong Wu, Dongjin J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. METHODS: Eighty-four patients who received percutaneous LAAC were randomly placed into two groups, general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with either propofol-remifentanil-cisatracurium-neostigmine (group C) or propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex (group S). The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess recovery quality 6 h after surgery, and the time of spontaneous respiration, the time of consciousness recovery, the time of extubation, the duration in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and the adverse events after awakening were collected. RESULTS: Compared with the group C, the group S demonstrated significantly higher individual QoR-40 dimension scores, a significantly shorter recovery time for spontaneous respiration and consciousness, time of extubation, and duration in the PACU, and a lower incidence of transient hypoxemia, agitation, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. There was a non-significant trend for the length of stay in the hospital in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex provided better quality of recovery, shorter anaesthesia duration, and lower incidence of hypoxemia and agitation. Neuromuscular blockade and reversal using rocuronium and sugamadex is better than with cisatricurium and neostigmine on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Trial registration: chictr.org, ChiCTR2000031857. Registered on April 12, 2020. BioMed Central 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9419309/ /pubmed/36028870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Qiongzhen
Yao, Haixia
Wu, Jingxiang
Xu, Meiying
Xie, Hong
Wu, Dongjin
A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_full A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_fullStr A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_short A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_sort comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liqiongzhen acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT yaohaixia acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT wujingxiang acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT xumeiying acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT xiehong acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT wudongjin acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT liqiongzhen comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT yaohaixia comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT wujingxiang comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT xumeiying comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT xiehong comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT wudongjin comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage