Cargando…
A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1 |
_version_ | 1784777148349808640 |
---|---|
author | Li, Qiongzhen Yao, Haixia Wu, Jingxiang Xu, Meiying Xie, Hong Wu, Dongjin |
author_facet | Li, Qiongzhen Yao, Haixia Wu, Jingxiang Xu, Meiying Xie, Hong Wu, Dongjin |
author_sort | Li, Qiongzhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. METHODS: Eighty-four patients who received percutaneous LAAC were randomly placed into two groups, general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with either propofol-remifentanil-cisatracurium-neostigmine (group C) or propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex (group S). The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess recovery quality 6 h after surgery, and the time of spontaneous respiration, the time of consciousness recovery, the time of extubation, the duration in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and the adverse events after awakening were collected. RESULTS: Compared with the group C, the group S demonstrated significantly higher individual QoR-40 dimension scores, a significantly shorter recovery time for spontaneous respiration and consciousness, time of extubation, and duration in the PACU, and a lower incidence of transient hypoxemia, agitation, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. There was a non-significant trend for the length of stay in the hospital in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex provided better quality of recovery, shorter anaesthesia duration, and lower incidence of hypoxemia and agitation. Neuromuscular blockade and reversal using rocuronium and sugamadex is better than with cisatricurium and neostigmine on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Trial registration: chictr.org, ChiCTR2000031857. Registered on April 12, 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9419309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94193092022-08-28 A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage Li, Qiongzhen Yao, Haixia Wu, Jingxiang Xu, Meiying Xie, Hong Wu, Dongjin J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. METHODS: Eighty-four patients who received percutaneous LAAC were randomly placed into two groups, general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with either propofol-remifentanil-cisatracurium-neostigmine (group C) or propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex (group S). The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess recovery quality 6 h after surgery, and the time of spontaneous respiration, the time of consciousness recovery, the time of extubation, the duration in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and the adverse events after awakening were collected. RESULTS: Compared with the group C, the group S demonstrated significantly higher individual QoR-40 dimension scores, a significantly shorter recovery time for spontaneous respiration and consciousness, time of extubation, and duration in the PACU, and a lower incidence of transient hypoxemia, agitation, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. There was a non-significant trend for the length of stay in the hospital in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex provided better quality of recovery, shorter anaesthesia duration, and lower incidence of hypoxemia and agitation. Neuromuscular blockade and reversal using rocuronium and sugamadex is better than with cisatricurium and neostigmine on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Trial registration: chictr.org, ChiCTR2000031857. Registered on April 12, 2020. BioMed Central 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9419309/ /pubmed/36028870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Qiongzhen Yao, Haixia Wu, Jingxiang Xu, Meiying Xie, Hong Wu, Dongjin A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
title | A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
title_full | A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
title_fullStr | A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
title_short | A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
title_sort | comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liqiongzhen acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT yaohaixia acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT wujingxiang acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT xumeiying acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT xiehong acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT wudongjin acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT liqiongzhen comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT yaohaixia comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT wujingxiang comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT xumeiying comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT xiehong comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage AT wudongjin comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage |