Cargando…
The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
BACKGROUND: An optimal bowel preparation can result in an improved colonoscopy. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the use of a sports drink (Mizone) plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a water plus PEG solution in bowel preparations. METHODS: This was a randomised co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2 |
_version_ | 1784777151120146432 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zhixin Gao, Hui Yuan, Xin Liu, Cenqin Bao, Zhenfei Yu, Siyi Xie, Haofen Wang, Weihong Xie, Jiarong Xu, Lei |
author_facet | Zhang, Zhixin Gao, Hui Yuan, Xin Liu, Cenqin Bao, Zhenfei Yu, Siyi Xie, Haofen Wang, Weihong Xie, Jiarong Xu, Lei |
author_sort | Zhang, Zhixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An optimal bowel preparation can result in an improved colonoscopy. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the use of a sports drink (Mizone) plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a water plus PEG solution in bowel preparations. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled study. All of the included patients were randomly divided into the following two groups: the PEG + Mizone group and the PEG + water group. The palatability of the solution was measured through the use of questionnaires. Additionally, bowel cleanliness was evaluated according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS, 0–14, with higher values indicating worse cleanliness), as well as with the aid of colonoscopy videos. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were enrolled. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was 74.8% in the PEG + Mizone group and 68.9% in the PEG + water group, with a risk difference of 5.9% (95% CI: − 4.8–16.6%), which indicated noninferiority (noninferiority margin: − 9.5% < − 4.8%). However, patients rated the palatability (65.9% vs 44.4%, P < 0.001) and willingness to recommend or repeat (88.9% vs 75.6%, P = 0.004) the administration of the PEG + Mizone preparation as being better than those of the PEG + water preparation. The rates of adverse events during the bowel preparations were not significantly different between the two groups, except for bloating (PEG + Mizone vs PEG + water, 4.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of PEG + Mizone was a well tolerated and effective bowel preparation, compared with the PEG + water treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04247386. Registered on 30 Jan 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9419325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94193252022-08-28 The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study Zhang, Zhixin Gao, Hui Yuan, Xin Liu, Cenqin Bao, Zhenfei Yu, Siyi Xie, Haofen Wang, Weihong Xie, Jiarong Xu, Lei Trials Research BACKGROUND: An optimal bowel preparation can result in an improved colonoscopy. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the use of a sports drink (Mizone) plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a water plus PEG solution in bowel preparations. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled study. All of the included patients were randomly divided into the following two groups: the PEG + Mizone group and the PEG + water group. The palatability of the solution was measured through the use of questionnaires. Additionally, bowel cleanliness was evaluated according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS, 0–14, with higher values indicating worse cleanliness), as well as with the aid of colonoscopy videos. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were enrolled. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was 74.8% in the PEG + Mizone group and 68.9% in the PEG + water group, with a risk difference of 5.9% (95% CI: − 4.8–16.6%), which indicated noninferiority (noninferiority margin: − 9.5% < − 4.8%). However, patients rated the palatability (65.9% vs 44.4%, P < 0.001) and willingness to recommend or repeat (88.9% vs 75.6%, P = 0.004) the administration of the PEG + Mizone preparation as being better than those of the PEG + water preparation. The rates of adverse events during the bowel preparations were not significantly different between the two groups, except for bloating (PEG + Mizone vs PEG + water, 4.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of PEG + Mizone was a well tolerated and effective bowel preparation, compared with the PEG + water treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04247386. Registered on 30 Jan 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9419325/ /pubmed/36028915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Zhixin Gao, Hui Yuan, Xin Liu, Cenqin Bao, Zhenfei Yu, Siyi Xie, Haofen Wang, Weihong Xie, Jiarong Xu, Lei The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
title | The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
title_full | The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
title_short | The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
title_sort | efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzhixin theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT gaohui theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT yuanxin theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT liucenqin theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT baozhenfei theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT yusiyi theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xiehaofen theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT wangweihong theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xiejiarong theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xulei theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT zhangzhixin efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT gaohui efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT yuanxin efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT liucenqin efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT baozhenfei efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT yusiyi efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xiehaofen efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT wangweihong efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xiejiarong efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xulei efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy |