Cargando…

The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: An optimal bowel preparation can result in an improved colonoscopy. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the use of a sports drink (Mizone) plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a water plus PEG solution in bowel preparations. METHODS: This was a randomised co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhixin, Gao, Hui, Yuan, Xin, Liu, Cenqin, Bao, Zhenfei, Yu, Siyi, Xie, Haofen, Wang, Weihong, Xie, Jiarong, Xu, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2
_version_ 1784777151120146432
author Zhang, Zhixin
Gao, Hui
Yuan, Xin
Liu, Cenqin
Bao, Zhenfei
Yu, Siyi
Xie, Haofen
Wang, Weihong
Xie, Jiarong
Xu, Lei
author_facet Zhang, Zhixin
Gao, Hui
Yuan, Xin
Liu, Cenqin
Bao, Zhenfei
Yu, Siyi
Xie, Haofen
Wang, Weihong
Xie, Jiarong
Xu, Lei
author_sort Zhang, Zhixin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An optimal bowel preparation can result in an improved colonoscopy. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the use of a sports drink (Mizone) plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a water plus PEG solution in bowel preparations. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled study. All of the included patients were randomly divided into the following two groups: the PEG + Mizone group and the PEG + water group. The palatability of the solution was measured through the use of questionnaires. Additionally, bowel cleanliness was evaluated according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS, 0–14, with higher values indicating worse cleanliness), as well as with the aid of colonoscopy videos. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were enrolled. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was 74.8% in the PEG + Mizone group and 68.9% in the PEG + water group, with a risk difference of 5.9% (95% CI: − 4.8–16.6%), which indicated noninferiority (noninferiority margin: − 9.5% <  − 4.8%). However, patients rated the palatability (65.9% vs 44.4%, P < 0.001) and willingness to recommend or repeat (88.9% vs 75.6%, P = 0.004) the administration of the PEG + Mizone preparation as being better than those of the PEG + water preparation. The rates of adverse events during the bowel preparations were not significantly different between the two groups, except for bloating (PEG + Mizone vs PEG + water, 4.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of PEG + Mizone was a well tolerated and effective bowel preparation, compared with the PEG + water treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04247386. Registered on 30 Jan 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9419325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94193252022-08-28 The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study Zhang, Zhixin Gao, Hui Yuan, Xin Liu, Cenqin Bao, Zhenfei Yu, Siyi Xie, Haofen Wang, Weihong Xie, Jiarong Xu, Lei Trials Research BACKGROUND: An optimal bowel preparation can result in an improved colonoscopy. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the use of a sports drink (Mizone) plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a water plus PEG solution in bowel preparations. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled study. All of the included patients were randomly divided into the following two groups: the PEG + Mizone group and the PEG + water group. The palatability of the solution was measured through the use of questionnaires. Additionally, bowel cleanliness was evaluated according to the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS, 0–14, with higher values indicating worse cleanliness), as well as with the aid of colonoscopy videos. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were enrolled. The rate of adequate bowel preparation was 74.8% in the PEG + Mizone group and 68.9% in the PEG + water group, with a risk difference of 5.9% (95% CI: − 4.8–16.6%), which indicated noninferiority (noninferiority margin: − 9.5% <  − 4.8%). However, patients rated the palatability (65.9% vs 44.4%, P < 0.001) and willingness to recommend or repeat (88.9% vs 75.6%, P = 0.004) the administration of the PEG + Mizone preparation as being better than those of the PEG + water preparation. The rates of adverse events during the bowel preparations were not significantly different between the two groups, except for bloating (PEG + Mizone vs PEG + water, 4.4% vs 13.3%, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of PEG + Mizone was a well tolerated and effective bowel preparation, compared with the PEG + water treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04247386. Registered on 30 Jan 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9419325/ /pubmed/36028915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Zhixin
Gao, Hui
Yuan, Xin
Liu, Cenqin
Bao, Zhenfei
Yu, Siyi
Xie, Haofen
Wang, Weihong
Xie, Jiarong
Xu, Lei
The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
title The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
title_full The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
title_fullStr The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
title_short The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
title_sort efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06658-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhixin theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT gaohui theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT yuanxin theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT liucenqin theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT baozhenfei theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT yusiyi theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT xiehaofen theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT wangweihong theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT xiejiarong theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT xulei theefficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT zhangzhixin efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT gaohui efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT yuanxin efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT liucenqin efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT baozhenfei efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT yusiyi efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT xiehaofen efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT wangweihong efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT xiejiarong efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT xulei efficacyandtolerabilityofsportsdrinkversuswaterinbowelpreparationsarandomisedcontrolledstudy