Cargando…

High-level visual search in children with autism

Visual search has been classified as easy feature search, with rapid target detection and little set size dependence, versus slower difficult search with focused attention, with set size–dependent speed. Reverse hierarchy theory attributes these classes to rapid high cortical-level vision at a glanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abassi Abu Rukab, Safa'a, Khayat, Noam, Hochstein, Shaul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.9.6
_version_ 1784777180038823936
author Abassi Abu Rukab, Safa'a
Khayat, Noam
Hochstein, Shaul
author_facet Abassi Abu Rukab, Safa'a
Khayat, Noam
Hochstein, Shaul
author_sort Abassi Abu Rukab, Safa'a
collection PubMed
description Visual search has been classified as easy feature search, with rapid target detection and little set size dependence, versus slower difficult search with focused attention, with set size–dependent speed. Reverse hierarchy theory attributes these classes to rapid high cortical-level vision at a glance versus low-level vision with scrutiny, attributing easy search to high-level representations. Accordingly, faces “pop out” of heterogeneous object photographs. Individuals with autism have difficulties recognizing faces, and we now asked if this disability disturbs their search for faces. We compare search times and set size slopes for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and those with neurotypical development (NT) when searching for faces. Human face targets were found rapidly, with shallow set size slopes. The between-group difference between slopes (18.8 vs. 11.3 ms/item) is significant, suggesting that faces may not “pop out” as easily, but in our view does not warrant classifying ASD face search as categorically different from that of NT children. We also tested search for different target categories, dog and lion faces, and nonface basic categories, cars and houses. The ASD group was generally a bit slower than the NT group, and their slopes were somewhat steeper. Nevertheless, the overall dependencies on target category were similar: human face search fastest, nonface categories slowest, and dog and lion faces in between. We conclude that autism may spare vision at a glance, including face detection, despite its reported effects on face recognition, which may require vision with scrutiny. This dichotomy is consistent with the two perceptual modes suggested by reverse hierarchy theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9419456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94194562022-08-28 High-level visual search in children with autism Abassi Abu Rukab, Safa'a Khayat, Noam Hochstein, Shaul J Vis Article Visual search has been classified as easy feature search, with rapid target detection and little set size dependence, versus slower difficult search with focused attention, with set size–dependent speed. Reverse hierarchy theory attributes these classes to rapid high cortical-level vision at a glance versus low-level vision with scrutiny, attributing easy search to high-level representations. Accordingly, faces “pop out” of heterogeneous object photographs. Individuals with autism have difficulties recognizing faces, and we now asked if this disability disturbs their search for faces. We compare search times and set size slopes for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and those with neurotypical development (NT) when searching for faces. Human face targets were found rapidly, with shallow set size slopes. The between-group difference between slopes (18.8 vs. 11.3 ms/item) is significant, suggesting that faces may not “pop out” as easily, but in our view does not warrant classifying ASD face search as categorically different from that of NT children. We also tested search for different target categories, dog and lion faces, and nonface basic categories, cars and houses. The ASD group was generally a bit slower than the NT group, and their slopes were somewhat steeper. Nevertheless, the overall dependencies on target category were similar: human face search fastest, nonface categories slowest, and dog and lion faces in between. We conclude that autism may spare vision at a glance, including face detection, despite its reported effects on face recognition, which may require vision with scrutiny. This dichotomy is consistent with the two perceptual modes suggested by reverse hierarchy theory. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9419456/ /pubmed/35994261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.9.6 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Abassi Abu Rukab, Safa'a
Khayat, Noam
Hochstein, Shaul
High-level visual search in children with autism
title High-level visual search in children with autism
title_full High-level visual search in children with autism
title_fullStr High-level visual search in children with autism
title_full_unstemmed High-level visual search in children with autism
title_short High-level visual search in children with autism
title_sort high-level visual search in children with autism
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9419456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35994261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.9.6
work_keys_str_mv AT abassiaburukabsafaa highlevelvisualsearchinchildrenwithautism
AT khayatnoam highlevelvisualsearchinchildrenwithautism
AT hochsteinshaul highlevelvisualsearchinchildrenwithautism