Cargando…
Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool for anaesthesia and critical care physicians and dedicated training is mandatory. This survey describes the current state of Italian residency training programs through the comparison of residents’ and directors’ perspective....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03708-w |
_version_ | 1784777336069029888 |
---|---|
author | Mongodi, Silvia Bonomi, Francesca Vaschetto, Rosanna Robba, Chiara Salve, Giulia Volta, Carlo Alberto Bignami, Elena Vetrugno, Luigi Corradi, Francesco Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio Pelosi, Paolo Mojoli, Francesco |
author_facet | Mongodi, Silvia Bonomi, Francesca Vaschetto, Rosanna Robba, Chiara Salve, Giulia Volta, Carlo Alberto Bignami, Elena Vetrugno, Luigi Corradi, Francesco Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio Pelosi, Paolo Mojoli, Francesco |
author_sort | Mongodi, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool for anaesthesia and critical care physicians and dedicated training is mandatory. This survey describes the current state of Italian residency training programs through the comparison of residents’ and directors’ perspective. METHODS: Observational prospective cross-sectional study: 12-question national e-survey sent to Italian directors of anaesthesia and critical care residency programs (N = 40) and residents (N = 3000). Questions focused on POCUS teaching (vascular access, transthoracic echocardiography, focused assessment for trauma, transcranial Doppler, regional anaesthesia, lung and diaphragm ultrasound), organization (dedicated hours, teaching tools, mentors), perceived adequacy/importance of the training and limiting factors. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-one residents and 22 directors completed the survey. Bedside teaching (59.4–93.2%) and classroom lessons (29.7–54.4%) were the most frequent teaching tools. Directors reported higher participation in research projects (p < 0.05 for all techniques but focused assessment for trauma) and simulation (p < 0.05 for all techniques but transthoracic echocardiography). Use of online teaching was limited (< 10%); however, 87.4% of residents used additional web-based tools. Consultants were the most frequent mentors, with different perspectives between residents (72.0%) and directors (95.5%; p = 0.013). Residents reported self-training more frequently (48.5 vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001). Evaluation was mainly performed at the bedside; a certification was not available in most cases (< 10%). Most residents perceived POCUS techniques as extremely important. Residents underestimated the relevance given by directors to ultrasound skills in their evaluation and the minimal number of exams required to achieve basic competency. Overall, the training was considered adequate for vascular access only (62.2%). Directors mainly agreed on the need of ultrasound teaching improvement in all fields. Main limitations were the absence of a standardized curriculum for residents and limited mentors’ time/expertise for directors. CONCLUSION: POCUS education is present in Italian anaesthesia and critical care residency programs, although with potential for improvement. Significant discrepancies between residents’ and directors’ perspectives were identified. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03708-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9420188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94201882022-08-29 Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives Mongodi, Silvia Bonomi, Francesca Vaschetto, Rosanna Robba, Chiara Salve, Giulia Volta, Carlo Alberto Bignami, Elena Vetrugno, Luigi Corradi, Francesco Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio Pelosi, Paolo Mojoli, Francesco BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool for anaesthesia and critical care physicians and dedicated training is mandatory. This survey describes the current state of Italian residency training programs through the comparison of residents’ and directors’ perspective. METHODS: Observational prospective cross-sectional study: 12-question national e-survey sent to Italian directors of anaesthesia and critical care residency programs (N = 40) and residents (N = 3000). Questions focused on POCUS teaching (vascular access, transthoracic echocardiography, focused assessment for trauma, transcranial Doppler, regional anaesthesia, lung and diaphragm ultrasound), organization (dedicated hours, teaching tools, mentors), perceived adequacy/importance of the training and limiting factors. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-one residents and 22 directors completed the survey. Bedside teaching (59.4–93.2%) and classroom lessons (29.7–54.4%) were the most frequent teaching tools. Directors reported higher participation in research projects (p < 0.05 for all techniques but focused assessment for trauma) and simulation (p < 0.05 for all techniques but transthoracic echocardiography). Use of online teaching was limited (< 10%); however, 87.4% of residents used additional web-based tools. Consultants were the most frequent mentors, with different perspectives between residents (72.0%) and directors (95.5%; p = 0.013). Residents reported self-training more frequently (48.5 vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001). Evaluation was mainly performed at the bedside; a certification was not available in most cases (< 10%). Most residents perceived POCUS techniques as extremely important. Residents underestimated the relevance given by directors to ultrasound skills in their evaluation and the minimal number of exams required to achieve basic competency. Overall, the training was considered adequate for vascular access only (62.2%). Directors mainly agreed on the need of ultrasound teaching improvement in all fields. Main limitations were the absence of a standardized curriculum for residents and limited mentors’ time/expertise for directors. CONCLUSION: POCUS education is present in Italian anaesthesia and critical care residency programs, although with potential for improvement. Significant discrepancies between residents’ and directors’ perspectives were identified. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03708-w. BioMed Central 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9420188/ /pubmed/36031630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03708-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mongodi, Silvia Bonomi, Francesca Vaschetto, Rosanna Robba, Chiara Salve, Giulia Volta, Carlo Alberto Bignami, Elena Vetrugno, Luigi Corradi, Francesco Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio Pelosi, Paolo Mojoli, Francesco Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
title | Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
title_full | Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
title_fullStr | Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
title_short | Point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
title_sort | point-of-care ultrasound training for residents in anaesthesia and critical care: results of a national survey comparing residents and training program directors’ perspectives |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03708-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mongodisilvia pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT bonomifrancesca pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT vaschettorosanna pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT robbachiara pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT salvegiulia pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT voltacarloalberto pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT bignamielena pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT vetrugnoluigi pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT corradifrancesco pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT maggioresalvatoremaurizio pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT pelosipaolo pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives AT mojolifrancesco pointofcareultrasoundtrainingforresidentsinanaesthesiaandcriticalcareresultsofanationalsurveycomparingresidentsandtrainingprogramdirectorsperspectives |