Cargando…

An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2

More than two and a half years have already passed since the first case of COVID-19 was officially reported (December 2019), as well as more than two years since the WHO declared the current pandemic (March 2020). During these months, the advances on the knowledge of the COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Domingo, Jose L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114131
_version_ 1784777364498022400
author Domingo, Jose L.
author_facet Domingo, Jose L.
author_sort Domingo, Jose L.
collection PubMed
description More than two and a half years have already passed since the first case of COVID-19 was officially reported (December 2019), as well as more than two years since the WHO declared the current pandemic (March 2020). During these months, the advances on the knowledge of the COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus responsible of the infection, have been very significant. However, there are still some weak points on that knowledge, being the origin of SARS-CoV-2 one of the most notorious. One year ago, I published a review focused on what we knew and what we need to know about the origin of that coronavirus, a key point for the prevention of potential future pandemics of a similar nature. The analysis of the available publications until July 2021 did not allow drawing definitive conclusions on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Given the great importance of that issue, the present review was aimed at updating the scientific information on that origin. Unfortunately, there have not been significant advances on that topic, remaining basically the same two hypotheses on it. One of them is the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2, while the second one is the possible leak of this coronavirus from a laboratory. Most recent papers do not include observational or experimental studies, being discussions and positions on these two main hypotheses. Based on the information here reviewed, there is not yet a definitive and well demonstrated conclusion on the origin of SARS-CoV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9420317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94203172022-08-30 An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 Domingo, Jose L. Environ Res Article More than two and a half years have already passed since the first case of COVID-19 was officially reported (December 2019), as well as more than two years since the WHO declared the current pandemic (March 2020). During these months, the advances on the knowledge of the COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus responsible of the infection, have been very significant. However, there are still some weak points on that knowledge, being the origin of SARS-CoV-2 one of the most notorious. One year ago, I published a review focused on what we knew and what we need to know about the origin of that coronavirus, a key point for the prevention of potential future pandemics of a similar nature. The analysis of the available publications until July 2021 did not allow drawing definitive conclusions on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Given the great importance of that issue, the present review was aimed at updating the scientific information on that origin. Unfortunately, there have not been significant advances on that topic, remaining basically the same two hypotheses on it. One of them is the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2, while the second one is the possible leak of this coronavirus from a laboratory. Most recent papers do not include observational or experimental studies, being discussions and positions on these two main hypotheses. Based on the information here reviewed, there is not yet a definitive and well demonstrated conclusion on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-12 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9420317/ /pubmed/36037920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114131 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Domingo, Jose L.
An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
title An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
title_full An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
title_short An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of sars-cov-2
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114131
work_keys_str_mv AT domingojosel anupdatedreviewofthescientificliteratureontheoriginofsarscov2
AT domingojosel updatedreviewofthescientificliteratureontheoriginofsarscov2