Cargando…

The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases

BACKGROUND: Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) is a proven implant that has reliably delivered excellent results for decades. Based on the constrained implant design in MB-UKA, the occasional occurrence of anterior impingement should be expected. However, surprisingly, there...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Röttinger, Timon, Lisitano, Leonard, Wiedl, Andreas, Mayr, Edgar, Röttinger, Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.019
_version_ 1784777365700739072
author Röttinger, Timon
Lisitano, Leonard
Wiedl, Andreas
Mayr, Edgar
Röttinger, Heinz
author_facet Röttinger, Timon
Lisitano, Leonard
Wiedl, Andreas
Mayr, Edgar
Röttinger, Heinz
author_sort Röttinger, Timon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) is a proven implant that has reliably delivered excellent results for decades. Based on the constrained implant design in MB-UKA, the occasional occurrence of anterior impingement should be expected. However, surprisingly, there are no clinical reports. METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, 14 patients with anterior medial knee pain were admitted to our arthroplasty center after MB-UKA implantation elsewhere. After taking the medical history and clinical examination, radiological imaging of the implant in at least 2 planes, including a whole-leg anteroposterior view, was performed. The “Knee Society Score (KSS)” and the “Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)” were recorded. Anterior impingement was diagnosed by reviewing the typical findings and specific exclusion of other diagnoses. RESULTS: The 14 patients showed a KSS of 46.6 and a KOOS of 51.5. The average pain level on the “Visual Analog Scale” was 7.8. The positioning of the implants showed consistently noticeable deviations from the standard recommendations. All 14 patients were treated by removing the MB-UKA and changing to a complete TKA. At the 12-month follow-up, the average Visual Analog Scale score was 1.8, and KOOS and KSS were 86 and 82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The potential risk of anterior impingement in MB-UKA can be assumed. Diagnosis requires a detailed collection of medical history and clinical details combined with accurate radiological imaging. The cause of anterior impingement in MB-UKA is multifactorial and refers in our small group to the sum of minor deviations in implant positioning compared to the general recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9420323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94203232022-08-29 The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases Röttinger, Timon Lisitano, Leonard Wiedl, Andreas Mayr, Edgar Röttinger, Heinz Arthroplast Today Case Report BACKGROUND: Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) is a proven implant that has reliably delivered excellent results for decades. Based on the constrained implant design in MB-UKA, the occasional occurrence of anterior impingement should be expected. However, surprisingly, there are no clinical reports. METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, 14 patients with anterior medial knee pain were admitted to our arthroplasty center after MB-UKA implantation elsewhere. After taking the medical history and clinical examination, radiological imaging of the implant in at least 2 planes, including a whole-leg anteroposterior view, was performed. The “Knee Society Score (KSS)” and the “Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)” were recorded. Anterior impingement was diagnosed by reviewing the typical findings and specific exclusion of other diagnoses. RESULTS: The 14 patients showed a KSS of 46.6 and a KOOS of 51.5. The average pain level on the “Visual Analog Scale” was 7.8. The positioning of the implants showed consistently noticeable deviations from the standard recommendations. All 14 patients were treated by removing the MB-UKA and changing to a complete TKA. At the 12-month follow-up, the average Visual Analog Scale score was 1.8, and KOOS and KSS were 86 and 82, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The potential risk of anterior impingement in MB-UKA can be assumed. Diagnosis requires a detailed collection of medical history and clinical details combined with accurate radiological imaging. The cause of anterior impingement in MB-UKA is multifactorial and refers in our small group to the sum of minor deviations in implant positioning compared to the general recommendations. Elsevier 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9420323/ /pubmed/36042942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.019 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Röttinger, Timon
Lisitano, Leonard
Wiedl, Andreas
Mayr, Edgar
Röttinger, Heinz
The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases
title The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases
title_full The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases
title_fullStr The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases
title_full_unstemmed The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases
title_short The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty—A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases
title_sort anterior impingement after mobile-bearing unicomparimental knee arthroplasty—a neglected problem. a clinical report of 14 cases
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.019
work_keys_str_mv AT rottingertimon theanteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT lisitanoleonard theanteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT wiedlandreas theanteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT mayredgar theanteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT rottingerheinz theanteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT rottingertimon anteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT lisitanoleonard anteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT wiedlandreas anteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT mayredgar anteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases
AT rottingerheinz anteriorimpingementaftermobilebearingunicomparimentalkneearthroplastyaneglectedproblemaclinicalreportof14cases