Cargando…

Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies

Magnetic pore fabrics (MPF) are an efficient way to characterize pore space anisotropy, i.e., the average pore shape and orientation. They are determined by impregnating rocks with ferrofluid and then measuring their magnetic anisotropy. Obtaining even impregnation of the entire pore space is key fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pugnetti, Michele, Zhou, Yi, Biedermann, Andrea R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01809-0
_version_ 1784777443754639360
author Pugnetti, Michele
Zhou, Yi
Biedermann, Andrea R.
author_facet Pugnetti, Michele
Zhou, Yi
Biedermann, Andrea R.
author_sort Pugnetti, Michele
collection PubMed
description Magnetic pore fabrics (MPF) are an efficient way to characterize pore space anisotropy, i.e., the average pore shape and orientation. They are determined by impregnating rocks with ferrofluid and then measuring their magnetic anisotropy. Obtaining even impregnation of the entire pore space is key for reliable results, and a major challenge in MPF studies. Here, impregnation efficiency and its spatial variability are systematically tested for natural (wood, rock) and synthetic (gel) samples, using oil- and water-based ferrofluids, and comparing various impregnation methods: percolation, standard vacuum impregnation, flowthrough vacuum impregnation, immersion, diffusion, and diffusion assisted by magnetic forcing. Seemingly best impregnation was achieved by standard vacuum impregnation and oil-based ferrofluid (76%), and percolation (53%) on rock samples; however, sub-sampling revealed inhomogeneous distribution of the fluid within the samples. Flowthrough vacuum impregnation yielded slightly lower bulk impregnation efficiencies, but more homogeneous distribution of the fluid. Magnetically assisted diffusion led to faster impregnation in gel samples, but appeared to be hindered in rocks by particle aggregation. This suggests that processes other than the mechanical transport of nanoparticles in the pore space need to be taken into account, including potential interactions between the ferrofluid and rock, particle aggregation and filtering. Our results indicate that bulk measurements are not sufficient to assess impregnation efficiency. Since spatial variation of impregnation efficiency may affect MPF orientation, degree and shape, impregnation efficiency should be tested on sub-samples prior to MPF interpretation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11242-022-01809-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9420688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94206882022-08-30 Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies Pugnetti, Michele Zhou, Yi Biedermann, Andrea R. Transp Porous Media Article Magnetic pore fabrics (MPF) are an efficient way to characterize pore space anisotropy, i.e., the average pore shape and orientation. They are determined by impregnating rocks with ferrofluid and then measuring their magnetic anisotropy. Obtaining even impregnation of the entire pore space is key for reliable results, and a major challenge in MPF studies. Here, impregnation efficiency and its spatial variability are systematically tested for natural (wood, rock) and synthetic (gel) samples, using oil- and water-based ferrofluids, and comparing various impregnation methods: percolation, standard vacuum impregnation, flowthrough vacuum impregnation, immersion, diffusion, and diffusion assisted by magnetic forcing. Seemingly best impregnation was achieved by standard vacuum impregnation and oil-based ferrofluid (76%), and percolation (53%) on rock samples; however, sub-sampling revealed inhomogeneous distribution of the fluid within the samples. Flowthrough vacuum impregnation yielded slightly lower bulk impregnation efficiencies, but more homogeneous distribution of the fluid. Magnetically assisted diffusion led to faster impregnation in gel samples, but appeared to be hindered in rocks by particle aggregation. This suggests that processes other than the mechanical transport of nanoparticles in the pore space need to be taken into account, including potential interactions between the ferrofluid and rock, particle aggregation and filtering. Our results indicate that bulk measurements are not sufficient to assess impregnation efficiency. Since spatial variation of impregnation efficiency may affect MPF orientation, degree and shape, impregnation efficiency should be tested on sub-samples prior to MPF interpretation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11242-022-01809-0. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9420688/ /pubmed/36051177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01809-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Pugnetti, Michele
Zhou, Yi
Biedermann, Andrea R.
Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies
title Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies
title_full Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies
title_fullStr Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies
title_full_unstemmed Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies
title_short Ferrofluid Impregnation Efficiency and Its Spatial Variability in Natural and Synthetic Porous Media: Implications for Magnetic Pore Fabric Studies
title_sort ferrofluid impregnation efficiency and its spatial variability in natural and synthetic porous media: implications for magnetic pore fabric studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01809-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pugnettimichele ferrofluidimpregnationefficiencyanditsspatialvariabilityinnaturalandsyntheticporousmediaimplicationsformagneticporefabricstudies
AT zhouyi ferrofluidimpregnationefficiencyanditsspatialvariabilityinnaturalandsyntheticporousmediaimplicationsformagneticporefabricstudies
AT biedermannandrear ferrofluidimpregnationefficiencyanditsspatialvariabilityinnaturalandsyntheticporousmediaimplicationsformagneticporefabricstudies