Cargando…

Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report

Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not ade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Jacqueline K., Hassel, Stefanie, Davis, Andrew D., Zamyadi, Mojdeh, Arnott, Stephen R., Milev, Roumen, Lam, Raymond W., Frey, Benicio N., Hall, Geoffrey B., Müller, Daniel J., Rotzinger, Susan, Kennedy, Sidney H., Strother, Stephen C., MacQueen, Glenda M., Greiner, Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103120
_version_ 1784777598393384960
author Harris, Jacqueline K.
Hassel, Stefanie
Davis, Andrew D.
Zamyadi, Mojdeh
Arnott, Stephen R.
Milev, Roumen
Lam, Raymond W.
Frey, Benicio N.
Hall, Geoffrey B.
Müller, Daniel J.
Rotzinger, Susan
Kennedy, Sidney H.
Strother, Stephen C.
MacQueen, Glenda M.
Greiner, Russell
author_facet Harris, Jacqueline K.
Hassel, Stefanie
Davis, Andrew D.
Zamyadi, Mojdeh
Arnott, Stephen R.
Milev, Roumen
Lam, Raymond W.
Frey, Benicio N.
Hall, Geoffrey B.
Müller, Daniel J.
Rotzinger, Susan
Kennedy, Sidney H.
Strother, Stephen C.
MacQueen, Glenda M.
Greiner, Russell
author_sort Harris, Jacqueline K.
collection PubMed
description Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not adequately reflect how these models will generalize when used in clinical practice. Not only does the act of collecting data at multiple sites generally increase sample sizes (a critical point in machine learning development) it also generates a more heterogeneous dataset due to systematic differences in scanners at different sites, and geographical differences in patient populations. As part of the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) study, 144 MDD patients from six sites underwent resting state fMRI prior to starting escitalopram treatment, and again two weeks after the start. Here, we consider ways to use machine learning techniques to produce models that can predict response (measured at eight weeks after initiation), based on various parcellations, functional connectivity (FC) metrics, dimensionality reduction algorithms, and base learners, and also whether to use scans from one or both time points. Models that use only baseline (pre-treatment) or only week 2 (early-response) whole-brain FC features consistently failed to perform significantly better than default models. Utilizing the change in FC between these two time points, however, yielded significant results, with the best performing analytical pipeline achieving 69.6% (SD 10.8) accuracy. These results appear contrary to findings from many smaller single-site studies, which report substantially higher predictive accuracies from models trained on only baseline resting state FC features, suggesting these models may not generalize well beyond data used for development. Further, these results indicate the potential value of collecting data both before and shortly after treatment initiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9421454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94214542022-08-30 Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report Harris, Jacqueline K. Hassel, Stefanie Davis, Andrew D. Zamyadi, Mojdeh Arnott, Stephen R. Milev, Roumen Lam, Raymond W. Frey, Benicio N. Hall, Geoffrey B. Müller, Daniel J. Rotzinger, Susan Kennedy, Sidney H. Strother, Stephen C. MacQueen, Glenda M. Greiner, Russell Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not adequately reflect how these models will generalize when used in clinical practice. Not only does the act of collecting data at multiple sites generally increase sample sizes (a critical point in machine learning development) it also generates a more heterogeneous dataset due to systematic differences in scanners at different sites, and geographical differences in patient populations. As part of the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) study, 144 MDD patients from six sites underwent resting state fMRI prior to starting escitalopram treatment, and again two weeks after the start. Here, we consider ways to use machine learning techniques to produce models that can predict response (measured at eight weeks after initiation), based on various parcellations, functional connectivity (FC) metrics, dimensionality reduction algorithms, and base learners, and also whether to use scans from one or both time points. Models that use only baseline (pre-treatment) or only week 2 (early-response) whole-brain FC features consistently failed to perform significantly better than default models. Utilizing the change in FC between these two time points, however, yielded significant results, with the best performing analytical pipeline achieving 69.6% (SD 10.8) accuracy. These results appear contrary to findings from many smaller single-site studies, which report substantially higher predictive accuracies from models trained on only baseline resting state FC features, suggesting these models may not generalize well beyond data used for development. Further, these results indicate the potential value of collecting data both before and shortly after treatment initiation. Elsevier 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9421454/ /pubmed/35908308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103120 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Harris, Jacqueline K.
Hassel, Stefanie
Davis, Andrew D.
Zamyadi, Mojdeh
Arnott, Stephen R.
Milev, Roumen
Lam, Raymond W.
Frey, Benicio N.
Hall, Geoffrey B.
Müller, Daniel J.
Rotzinger, Susan
Kennedy, Sidney H.
Strother, Stephen C.
MacQueen, Glenda M.
Greiner, Russell
Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
title Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
title_full Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
title_fullStr Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
title_full_unstemmed Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
title_short Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
title_sort predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fmri in a multi-site sample: a can-bind-1 report
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103120
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisjacquelinek predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT hasselstefanie predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT davisandrewd predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT zamyadimojdeh predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT arnottstephenr predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT milevroumen predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT lamraymondw predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT freybenicion predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT hallgeoffreyb predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT mullerdanielj predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT rotzingersusan predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT kennedysidneyh predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT strotherstephenc predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT macqueenglendam predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report
AT greinerrussell predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report