Cargando…
Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report
Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not ade...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103120 |
_version_ | 1784777598393384960 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Jacqueline K. Hassel, Stefanie Davis, Andrew D. Zamyadi, Mojdeh Arnott, Stephen R. Milev, Roumen Lam, Raymond W. Frey, Benicio N. Hall, Geoffrey B. Müller, Daniel J. Rotzinger, Susan Kennedy, Sidney H. Strother, Stephen C. MacQueen, Glenda M. Greiner, Russell |
author_facet | Harris, Jacqueline K. Hassel, Stefanie Davis, Andrew D. Zamyadi, Mojdeh Arnott, Stephen R. Milev, Roumen Lam, Raymond W. Frey, Benicio N. Hall, Geoffrey B. Müller, Daniel J. Rotzinger, Susan Kennedy, Sidney H. Strother, Stephen C. MacQueen, Glenda M. Greiner, Russell |
author_sort | Harris, Jacqueline K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not adequately reflect how these models will generalize when used in clinical practice. Not only does the act of collecting data at multiple sites generally increase sample sizes (a critical point in machine learning development) it also generates a more heterogeneous dataset due to systematic differences in scanners at different sites, and geographical differences in patient populations. As part of the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) study, 144 MDD patients from six sites underwent resting state fMRI prior to starting escitalopram treatment, and again two weeks after the start. Here, we consider ways to use machine learning techniques to produce models that can predict response (measured at eight weeks after initiation), based on various parcellations, functional connectivity (FC) metrics, dimensionality reduction algorithms, and base learners, and also whether to use scans from one or both time points. Models that use only baseline (pre-treatment) or only week 2 (early-response) whole-brain FC features consistently failed to perform significantly better than default models. Utilizing the change in FC between these two time points, however, yielded significant results, with the best performing analytical pipeline achieving 69.6% (SD 10.8) accuracy. These results appear contrary to findings from many smaller single-site studies, which report substantially higher predictive accuracies from models trained on only baseline resting state FC features, suggesting these models may not generalize well beyond data used for development. Further, these results indicate the potential value of collecting data both before and shortly after treatment initiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9421454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94214542022-08-30 Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report Harris, Jacqueline K. Hassel, Stefanie Davis, Andrew D. Zamyadi, Mojdeh Arnott, Stephen R. Milev, Roumen Lam, Raymond W. Frey, Benicio N. Hall, Geoffrey B. Müller, Daniel J. Rotzinger, Susan Kennedy, Sidney H. Strother, Stephen C. MacQueen, Glenda M. Greiner, Russell Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not adequately reflect how these models will generalize when used in clinical practice. Not only does the act of collecting data at multiple sites generally increase sample sizes (a critical point in machine learning development) it also generates a more heterogeneous dataset due to systematic differences in scanners at different sites, and geographical differences in patient populations. As part of the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) study, 144 MDD patients from six sites underwent resting state fMRI prior to starting escitalopram treatment, and again two weeks after the start. Here, we consider ways to use machine learning techniques to produce models that can predict response (measured at eight weeks after initiation), based on various parcellations, functional connectivity (FC) metrics, dimensionality reduction algorithms, and base learners, and also whether to use scans from one or both time points. Models that use only baseline (pre-treatment) or only week 2 (early-response) whole-brain FC features consistently failed to perform significantly better than default models. Utilizing the change in FC between these two time points, however, yielded significant results, with the best performing analytical pipeline achieving 69.6% (SD 10.8) accuracy. These results appear contrary to findings from many smaller single-site studies, which report substantially higher predictive accuracies from models trained on only baseline resting state FC features, suggesting these models may not generalize well beyond data used for development. Further, these results indicate the potential value of collecting data both before and shortly after treatment initiation. Elsevier 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9421454/ /pubmed/35908308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103120 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Harris, Jacqueline K. Hassel, Stefanie Davis, Andrew D. Zamyadi, Mojdeh Arnott, Stephen R. Milev, Roumen Lam, Raymond W. Frey, Benicio N. Hall, Geoffrey B. Müller, Daniel J. Rotzinger, Susan Kennedy, Sidney H. Strother, Stephen C. MacQueen, Glenda M. Greiner, Russell Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report |
title | Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report |
title_full | Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report |
title_fullStr | Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report |
title_short | Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report |
title_sort | predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fmri in a multi-site sample: a can-bind-1 report |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisjacquelinek predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT hasselstefanie predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT davisandrewd predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT zamyadimojdeh predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT arnottstephenr predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT milevroumen predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT lamraymondw predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT freybenicion predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT hallgeoffreyb predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT mullerdanielj predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT rotzingersusan predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT kennedysidneyh predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT strotherstephenc predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT macqueenglendam predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report AT greinerrussell predictingescitalopramtreatmentresponsefrompretreatmentandearlyresponserestingstatefmriinamultisitesampleacanbind1report |