Cargando…

Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre

INTRODUCTION: Leukostasis refers to clinical symptoms caused by hyperleukocytosis seen in some haematological diseases such as leukaemia. Cytoreduction can be achieved by therapeutic leukapheresis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the procedures performed in our Centre and to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosales, Maria, Roncon, Susana, Mariz, Mário, Ferreira, Ana Maia, Faria, Filomena, Santos, Luisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520933
_version_ 1784777649190600704
author Rosales, Maria
Roncon, Susana
Mariz, Mário
Ferreira, Ana Maia
Faria, Filomena
Santos, Luisa
author_facet Rosales, Maria
Roncon, Susana
Mariz, Mário
Ferreira, Ana Maia
Faria, Filomena
Santos, Luisa
author_sort Rosales, Maria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Leukostasis refers to clinical symptoms caused by hyperleukocytosis seen in some haematological diseases such as leukaemia. Cytoreduction can be achieved by therapeutic leukapheresis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the procedures performed in our Centre and to evaluate their efficacy and safety. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all the therapeutic leukapheresis procedures carried out in our Centre between January 1998 and December 2020. The sample collection was obtained through the review of the clinical files of the respective patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the software R v.4.0.1. A total of 54 therapeutic leukapheresis procedures were performed in 31 patients in our Centre. RESULTS: After these procedures clinical improvement was observed in 16 patients and we verify that there was a significant difference in survival between the group that improved and the group that maintained the same clinical condition or worsened. The lack of immediate clinical improvement was a sign of a poor prognosis. Laboratory efficacy occurred in 16 patients who had a reduction in white blood cell count, with a 39.1% reduction after 24 h, and did not succeed in 15 patients, who had no reduction. However, in this case there is no significant difference in survival between the two groups. There was some complication in 53.9% of the procedures, with hypocalcaemia being the most frequent, which was observed in 22 procedures. Only 4 patients experienced serious side effects but these adverse reactions cannot be attributed to the procedures carried out. The overall survival rate 6 months after this treatment was 51.6%. CONCLUSION: Despite the reduced number of patients, we conclude that therapeutic leukapheresis is a safe and effective option that may still have a therapeutic role in some cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9421692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94216922022-09-23 Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre Rosales, Maria Roncon, Susana Mariz, Mário Ferreira, Ana Maia Faria, Filomena Santos, Luisa Transfus Med Hemother Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Leukostasis refers to clinical symptoms caused by hyperleukocytosis seen in some haematological diseases such as leukaemia. Cytoreduction can be achieved by therapeutic leukapheresis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the procedures performed in our Centre and to evaluate their efficacy and safety. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all the therapeutic leukapheresis procedures carried out in our Centre between January 1998 and December 2020. The sample collection was obtained through the review of the clinical files of the respective patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the software R v.4.0.1. A total of 54 therapeutic leukapheresis procedures were performed in 31 patients in our Centre. RESULTS: After these procedures clinical improvement was observed in 16 patients and we verify that there was a significant difference in survival between the group that improved and the group that maintained the same clinical condition or worsened. The lack of immediate clinical improvement was a sign of a poor prognosis. Laboratory efficacy occurred in 16 patients who had a reduction in white blood cell count, with a 39.1% reduction after 24 h, and did not succeed in 15 patients, who had no reduction. However, in this case there is no significant difference in survival between the two groups. There was some complication in 53.9% of the procedures, with hypocalcaemia being the most frequent, which was observed in 22 procedures. Only 4 patients experienced serious side effects but these adverse reactions cannot be attributed to the procedures carried out. The overall survival rate 6 months after this treatment was 51.6%. CONCLUSION: Despite the reduced number of patients, we conclude that therapeutic leukapheresis is a safe and effective option that may still have a therapeutic role in some cases. S. Karger AG 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9421692/ /pubmed/36159955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520933 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Rosales, Maria
Roncon, Susana
Mariz, Mário
Ferreira, Ana Maia
Faria, Filomena
Santos, Luisa
Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre
title Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre
title_full Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre
title_fullStr Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre
title_short Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre
title_sort therapeutic leukapheresis: experience of a single oncologic centre
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520933
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalesmaria therapeuticleukapheresisexperienceofasingleoncologiccentre
AT ronconsusana therapeuticleukapheresisexperienceofasingleoncologiccentre
AT marizmario therapeuticleukapheresisexperienceofasingleoncologiccentre
AT ferreiraanamaia therapeuticleukapheresisexperienceofasingleoncologiccentre
AT fariafilomena therapeuticleukapheresisexperienceofasingleoncologiccentre
AT santosluisa therapeuticleukapheresisexperienceofasingleoncologiccentre