Cargando…

Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. Novel organ preservation techniques such as hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) or normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) are under investigation in order to improve organ quality from exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakubauskas, Matas, Jakubauskiene, Lina, Leber, Bettina, Strupas, Kestutis, Stiegler, Philipp, Schemmer, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519788
_version_ 1784777650176262144
author Jakubauskas, Matas
Jakubauskiene, Lina
Leber, Bettina
Strupas, Kestutis
Stiegler, Philipp
Schemmer, Peter
author_facet Jakubauskas, Matas
Jakubauskiene, Lina
Leber, Bettina
Strupas, Kestutis
Stiegler, Philipp
Schemmer, Peter
author_sort Jakubauskas, Matas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. Novel organ preservation techniques such as hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) or normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) are under investigation in order to improve organ quality from extended criteria donors and donors after circulatory death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature reporting LTx outcomes using NMP or HMP compared to static cold storage (SCS). METHODS: The following data were retrieved: graft primary nonfunction rate, early allograft dysfunction (EAD) rate, biliary complication rate, and 12-month graft and patient survival. A total of 15 studies were included (6 NMP and 9 HMP studies), and meta-analysis was performed only for HMP studies because NMP had considerable differences. RESULTS: The systematic review showed the potential of NMP to reduce graft injury and lower the liver graft discard rate. The performed quantitative analyses showed that the use of HMP reduces the rate of EAD (odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.76; p = 0.001; I (2) = 0%) and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17–0.67; p = 0.002; I (2) = 0%) compared to SCS. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the use of HMP reduces the rate of EAD and non-anastomotic biliary strictures compared to SCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9421699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94216992022-09-23 Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jakubauskas, Matas Jakubauskiene, Lina Leber, Bettina Strupas, Kestutis Stiegler, Philipp Schemmer, Peter Visc Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. Novel organ preservation techniques such as hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) or normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) are under investigation in order to improve organ quality from extended criteria donors and donors after circulatory death. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature reporting LTx outcomes using NMP or HMP compared to static cold storage (SCS). METHODS: The following data were retrieved: graft primary nonfunction rate, early allograft dysfunction (EAD) rate, biliary complication rate, and 12-month graft and patient survival. A total of 15 studies were included (6 NMP and 9 HMP studies), and meta-analysis was performed only for HMP studies because NMP had considerable differences. RESULTS: The systematic review showed the potential of NMP to reduce graft injury and lower the liver graft discard rate. The performed quantitative analyses showed that the use of HMP reduces the rate of EAD (odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.76; p = 0.001; I (2) = 0%) and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17–0.67; p = 0.002; I (2) = 0%) compared to SCS. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the use of HMP reduces the rate of EAD and non-anastomotic biliary strictures compared to SCS. S. Karger AG 2022-08 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9421699/ /pubmed/36160822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519788 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Jakubauskas, Matas
Jakubauskiene, Lina
Leber, Bettina
Strupas, Kestutis
Stiegler, Philipp
Schemmer, Peter
Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort machine perfusion in liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519788
work_keys_str_mv AT jakubauskasmatas machineperfusioninlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jakubauskienelina machineperfusioninlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leberbettina machineperfusioninlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT strupaskestutis machineperfusioninlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stieglerphilipp machineperfusioninlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schemmerpeter machineperfusioninlivertransplantationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis