Cargando…

O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review

BACKGROUND: Health promotion projects commonly measure health outcomes and behavior to provide proof of effectiveness. An alternative concept that focuses on the real opportunities a person can choose from to influence their health is Amartya Sen's capability approach. Numerous tools have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Till, Maike, Ferschl, Susanne, Abu-Omar, Karim, Gelius, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421856/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac094.032
_version_ 1784777686670901248
author Till, Maike
Ferschl, Susanne
Abu-Omar, Karim
Gelius, Peter
author_facet Till, Maike
Ferschl, Susanne
Abu-Omar, Karim
Gelius, Peter
author_sort Till, Maike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health promotion projects commonly measure health outcomes and behavior to provide proof of effectiveness. An alternative concept that focuses on the real opportunities a person can choose from to influence their health is Amartya Sen's capability approach. Numerous tools have been developed to measure capability change in general, but it remains unclear which ones can be applied specifically to physical activity (PA).We therefore conducted a systematic review to identify appropriate tools to measure capabilities for physical activity and health and provide information on their quality. METHODS: The review included a total of 6,850 articles published between 2000 and June 2019 that were identified via searches on PubMed, EbscoHost, and ProQuest. Screenings of titles/abstracts and full texts were conducted independently by two researchers using Endnote X9 and Microsoft Excel. Identified tools are currently being analyzed regarding their indicators, evaluation methods, quality, and the extent to which they address capabilities for physical activity. RESULTS: The screening resulted in a total of 49 articles included in the analysis. Preliminary results show a diverse use of methods for measuring capabilities for healthy lifestyles. Preliminary results show that three categories of instruments can be identified: (a) Five studies employed secondary data analysis of specific datasets to extrapolate capabilities for healthy living; (b) five articles dealt with measuring capabilities using qualitative approaches (interviews, video recordings); (c) 39 articles reported on a total of 10 different questionnaires to measure capabilities. We identified only one instrument (employing both a questionnaire and qualitative measures) that explicitly measured capabilities for PA, albeit only for a specific target group. CONCLUSIONS: The identified articles show that capabilities for healthy lifestyles are mostly measured by questionnaire. Available tools are mostly target group- and setting-specific. Currently, there is a dearth of tools that explicitly cover capabilities for PA, especially across settings or target groups. Therefore, more research is needed to work towards the development of universally applicable tools to measure PA capability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9421856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94218562022-08-29 O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review Till, Maike Ferschl, Susanne Abu-Omar, Karim Gelius, Peter Eur J Public Health Parallel Sessions BACKGROUND: Health promotion projects commonly measure health outcomes and behavior to provide proof of effectiveness. An alternative concept that focuses on the real opportunities a person can choose from to influence their health is Amartya Sen's capability approach. Numerous tools have been developed to measure capability change in general, but it remains unclear which ones can be applied specifically to physical activity (PA).We therefore conducted a systematic review to identify appropriate tools to measure capabilities for physical activity and health and provide information on their quality. METHODS: The review included a total of 6,850 articles published between 2000 and June 2019 that were identified via searches on PubMed, EbscoHost, and ProQuest. Screenings of titles/abstracts and full texts were conducted independently by two researchers using Endnote X9 and Microsoft Excel. Identified tools are currently being analyzed regarding their indicators, evaluation methods, quality, and the extent to which they address capabilities for physical activity. RESULTS: The screening resulted in a total of 49 articles included in the analysis. Preliminary results show a diverse use of methods for measuring capabilities for healthy lifestyles. Preliminary results show that three categories of instruments can be identified: (a) Five studies employed secondary data analysis of specific datasets to extrapolate capabilities for healthy living; (b) five articles dealt with measuring capabilities using qualitative approaches (interviews, video recordings); (c) 39 articles reported on a total of 10 different questionnaires to measure capabilities. We identified only one instrument (employing both a questionnaire and qualitative measures) that explicitly measured capabilities for PA, albeit only for a specific target group. CONCLUSIONS: The identified articles show that capabilities for healthy lifestyles are mostly measured by questionnaire. Available tools are mostly target group- and setting-specific. Currently, there is a dearth of tools that explicitly cover capabilities for PA, especially across settings or target groups. Therefore, more research is needed to work towards the development of universally applicable tools to measure PA capability. Oxford University Press 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9421856/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac094.032 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Sessions
Till, Maike
Ferschl, Susanne
Abu-Omar, Karim
Gelius, Peter
O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review
title O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review
title_full O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review
title_fullStr O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review
title_full_unstemmed O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review
title_short O4-8 Measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: A Systematic review
title_sort o4-8 measuring capabilities for physical activity-related health outcomes: a systematic review
topic Parallel Sessions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421856/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac094.032
work_keys_str_mv AT tillmaike o48measuringcapabilitiesforphysicalactivityrelatedhealthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT ferschlsusanne o48measuringcapabilitiesforphysicalactivityrelatedhealthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT abuomarkarim o48measuringcapabilitiesforphysicalactivityrelatedhealthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT geliuspeter o48measuringcapabilitiesforphysicalactivityrelatedhealthoutcomesasystematicreview