Cargando…

S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe

BACKGROUND: The establishment of the EU physical activity (PA) guidelines and the HEPA monitoring framework has had an impact on policy development and implementation across the region from 2015. This works presents results from the third round of monitoring in 2021 and discusses trends since 2015....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendes, Romeu, Whiting, Stephen, Barbosa, Ana, Duffey, Keeva, Pinedo, Adriana, Arnaiz, Patricia, Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421903/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.008
_version_ 1784777698503032832
author Mendes, Romeu
Whiting, Stephen
Barbosa, Ana
Duffey, Keeva
Pinedo, Adriana
Arnaiz, Patricia
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
author_facet Mendes, Romeu
Whiting, Stephen
Barbosa, Ana
Duffey, Keeva
Pinedo, Adriana
Arnaiz, Patricia
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
author_sort Mendes, Romeu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The establishment of the EU physical activity (PA) guidelines and the HEPA monitoring framework has had an impact on policy development and implementation across the region from 2015. This works presents results from the third round of monitoring in 2021 and discusses trends since 2015. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed in 2021 to all EU Member States of the WHO European Region through the network of PA Focal Points, who were requested to collect data from national colleagues and complete the questionnaire. All EU Member States (27 in 2021) responded to the survey on the implementation of the 23 indicators of the HEPA monitoring framework. RESULTS: The results of the 2021 round of data collection on HEPA indicators showed an overall stabilization of the implementation of PA promotion policies. Besides important increases in several indicators, such as indicators 15 (HEPA in the training of physical education teachers), 20 (Schemes to promote physical activity at the workplace) and 21 (Schemes for community interventions to promote physical activity in older adults), many others decreased and others showed no progress. Most national physical activity policies or action plans were multi-sectoral, with good coverage of the sectors recognized as important for HEPA promotion. While some methodological aspects may have affected the results, this round also reflected policy implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–2021). COVID-19 has had a significant impact on all sectors of society but especially on health, sports, education and mobility, which are major areas for PA promotion and policy implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be an overall stabilization of the implementation of PA promotion policies since 2015. Public health experts and decision makers could utilise the increase in public awareness of the health benefits of physical activity kindled by the COVID-19 crisis to implement new health-promoting policies. Policy design, development and implementation of HEPA promotion must be strengthened for post-COVID-19 social and economic recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9421903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94219032022-08-29 S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe Mendes, Romeu Whiting, Stephen Barbosa, Ana Duffey, Keeva Pinedo, Adriana Arnaiz, Patricia Wickramasinghe, Kremlin Eur J Public Health Symposium BACKGROUND: The establishment of the EU physical activity (PA) guidelines and the HEPA monitoring framework has had an impact on policy development and implementation across the region from 2015. This works presents results from the third round of monitoring in 2021 and discusses trends since 2015. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed in 2021 to all EU Member States of the WHO European Region through the network of PA Focal Points, who were requested to collect data from national colleagues and complete the questionnaire. All EU Member States (27 in 2021) responded to the survey on the implementation of the 23 indicators of the HEPA monitoring framework. RESULTS: The results of the 2021 round of data collection on HEPA indicators showed an overall stabilization of the implementation of PA promotion policies. Besides important increases in several indicators, such as indicators 15 (HEPA in the training of physical education teachers), 20 (Schemes to promote physical activity at the workplace) and 21 (Schemes for community interventions to promote physical activity in older adults), many others decreased and others showed no progress. Most national physical activity policies or action plans were multi-sectoral, with good coverage of the sectors recognized as important for HEPA promotion. While some methodological aspects may have affected the results, this round also reflected policy implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–2021). COVID-19 has had a significant impact on all sectors of society but especially on health, sports, education and mobility, which are major areas for PA promotion and policy implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be an overall stabilization of the implementation of PA promotion policies since 2015. Public health experts and decision makers could utilise the increase in public awareness of the health benefits of physical activity kindled by the COVID-19 crisis to implement new health-promoting policies. Policy design, development and implementation of HEPA promotion must be strengthened for post-COVID-19 social and economic recovery. Oxford University Press 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9421903/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.008 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposium
Mendes, Romeu
Whiting, Stephen
Barbosa, Ana
Duffey, Keeva
Pinedo, Adriana
Arnaiz, Patricia
Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe
title S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe
title_full S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe
title_fullStr S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe
title_full_unstemmed S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe
title_short S02-3 Physical activity policies and good practices in Europe
title_sort s02-3 physical activity policies and good practices in europe
topic Symposium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9421903/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac093.008
work_keys_str_mv AT mendesromeu s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope
AT whitingstephen s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope
AT barbosaana s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope
AT duffeykeeva s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope
AT pinedoadriana s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope
AT arnaizpatricia s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope
AT wickramasinghekremlin s023physicalactivitypoliciesandgoodpracticesineurope