Cargando…
Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer
INTRODUCTION: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters such as; maximum standardized uptake values, standard metabolic tumor volume and otal lesion glycosis are important prognostic biomarkers in cancers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31899125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.10.014 |
_version_ | 1784777794134212608 |
---|---|
author | Aslan, Hale Cekin, Gul Pinar, Ercan Yazir, Mustafa Imre, Abdulkadir Songu, Murat Islek, Akif Aladag, Ibrahim Oncel, Ismail Semih |
author_facet | Aslan, Hale Cekin, Gul Pinar, Ercan Yazir, Mustafa Imre, Abdulkadir Songu, Murat Islek, Akif Aladag, Ibrahim Oncel, Ismail Semih |
author_sort | Aslan, Hale |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters such as; maximum standardized uptake values, standard metabolic tumor volume and otal lesion glycosis are important prognostic biomarkers in cancers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of these parameters in patients with head and neck cancers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 47 patients with head and neck cancer who underwent(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography prior to treatment. Standard metabolic tumor volume, otal lesion glycosis and standardized uptake were measured for each patient. The prognostic value of quantitative (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters and clinicopathologic variables on disease free survival and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median (range) standard metabolic tumor volume and otal lesion glycosis and standardized uptake were 7.63 cm(3) (0.6–34.3), 68.9 g (2.58–524.5 g), 13.89 (4.89–33.03 g/mL), respectively. Lymph node metastases and tumour differentiation were significant variables for disease free survival and overall survival, however, all (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters were not associated with disease- free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment quantities positron emission tomography parameters did not predict survival in head and neck cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9422361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94223612022-08-31 Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer Aslan, Hale Cekin, Gul Pinar, Ercan Yazir, Mustafa Imre, Abdulkadir Songu, Murat Islek, Akif Aladag, Ibrahim Oncel, Ismail Semih Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters such as; maximum standardized uptake values, standard metabolic tumor volume and otal lesion glycosis are important prognostic biomarkers in cancers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of these parameters in patients with head and neck cancers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 47 patients with head and neck cancer who underwent(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography prior to treatment. Standard metabolic tumor volume, otal lesion glycosis and standardized uptake were measured for each patient. The prognostic value of quantitative (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters and clinicopathologic variables on disease free survival and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median (range) standard metabolic tumor volume and otal lesion glycosis and standardized uptake were 7.63 cm(3) (0.6–34.3), 68.9 g (2.58–524.5 g), 13.89 (4.89–33.03 g/mL), respectively. Lymph node metastases and tumour differentiation were significant variables for disease free survival and overall survival, however, all (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters were not associated with disease- free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment quantities positron emission tomography parameters did not predict survival in head and neck cancer. Elsevier 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9422361/ /pubmed/31899125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.10.014 Text en © 2019 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aslan, Hale Cekin, Gul Pinar, Ercan Yazir, Mustafa Imre, Abdulkadir Songu, Murat Islek, Akif Aladag, Ibrahim Oncel, Ismail Semih Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
title | Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
title_full | Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
title_short | Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
title_sort | prognostic value of (18)f-fdg pet/ct parameters and histopathologic variables in head and neck cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31899125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.10.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aslanhale prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT cekingul prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT pinarercan prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT yazirmustafa prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT imreabdulkadir prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT songumurat prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT islekakif prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT aladagibrahim prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer AT oncelismailsemih prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctparametersandhistopathologicvariablesinheadandneckcancer |