Cargando…

Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()

INTRODUCTION: Electrophysiological evidence has reinforced the hypothesis that stuttering is associated with a deficit in modulation of the cortical auditory system during speech planning, contributing to an inefficient auditory feedback monitoring and, consequently, resulting in disfluencies. OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiorin, Michele, Marconato, Eduarda, Palharini, Talissa Almeida, Picoloto, Luana Altran, Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo, Cardoso, Ana Claudia Vieira, Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31648949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.08.005
_version_ 1784777800737095680
author Fiorin, Michele
Marconato, Eduarda
Palharini, Talissa Almeida
Picoloto, Luana Altran
Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Cardoso, Ana Claudia Vieira
Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti de
author_facet Fiorin, Michele
Marconato, Eduarda
Palharini, Talissa Almeida
Picoloto, Luana Altran
Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Cardoso, Ana Claudia Vieira
Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti de
author_sort Fiorin, Michele
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Electrophysiological evidence has reinforced the hypothesis that stuttering is associated with a deficit in modulation of the cortical auditory system during speech planning, contributing to an inefficient auditory feedback monitoring and, consequently, resulting in disfluencies. OBJECTIVE: To verify the impact of auditory feedback modifications on the spontaneous speech of individuals with stuttering. METHODS: Sixteen individuals, of both genders, aged 8–17 years and 11 months, with a diagnosis of persistent neurodevelopmental stuttering, were divided into two groups: Moderate Stuttering Group and Severe Stuttering Group. The testing procedures consisted of three stages: collection of identification data, audiological assessment and fluency evaluation of spontaneous speech in four auditory feedback conditions (non-altered, delayed, masked and amplified). The speech sample obtained in the non-altered feedback was considered the control; the others were considered as modified listening conditions. RESULTS: Regarding the stuttering-like disfluencies, a statistically significant difference was observed in the intragroup analysis of the Moderate Stuttering Group between non-altered and masked auditory feedback (p = 0.042), as well as between non-altered and amplified (p = 0.042). There was a statistically significant difference in the Severe Stuttering Group for all auditory feedback modifications in relation to the non-altered (delayed p = 0.012, masked p = 0.025 and amplified p = 0.042). There was also a reduction in flows of syllables and words-per-minute in the Moderate Stuttering Group for the delayed auditory feedback, as compared to non-altered (p = 0.017 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION: The effect of delayed auditory feedback was favorable for the Severe Stuttering Group, promoting speech fluency. The conditions of masked and amplified auditory feedback resulted in speech benefits in both groups, decreasing the number of stuttering-like disfluencies. The speech rate was not impaired by any listening condition analyzed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9422389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94223892022-08-31 Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering() Fiorin, Michele Marconato, Eduarda Palharini, Talissa Almeida Picoloto, Luana Altran Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Cardoso, Ana Claudia Vieira Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti de Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Electrophysiological evidence has reinforced the hypothesis that stuttering is associated with a deficit in modulation of the cortical auditory system during speech planning, contributing to an inefficient auditory feedback monitoring and, consequently, resulting in disfluencies. OBJECTIVE: To verify the impact of auditory feedback modifications on the spontaneous speech of individuals with stuttering. METHODS: Sixteen individuals, of both genders, aged 8–17 years and 11 months, with a diagnosis of persistent neurodevelopmental stuttering, were divided into two groups: Moderate Stuttering Group and Severe Stuttering Group. The testing procedures consisted of three stages: collection of identification data, audiological assessment and fluency evaluation of spontaneous speech in four auditory feedback conditions (non-altered, delayed, masked and amplified). The speech sample obtained in the non-altered feedback was considered the control; the others were considered as modified listening conditions. RESULTS: Regarding the stuttering-like disfluencies, a statistically significant difference was observed in the intragroup analysis of the Moderate Stuttering Group between non-altered and masked auditory feedback (p = 0.042), as well as between non-altered and amplified (p = 0.042). There was a statistically significant difference in the Severe Stuttering Group for all auditory feedback modifications in relation to the non-altered (delayed p = 0.012, masked p = 0.025 and amplified p = 0.042). There was also a reduction in flows of syllables and words-per-minute in the Moderate Stuttering Group for the delayed auditory feedback, as compared to non-altered (p = 0.017 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION: The effect of delayed auditory feedback was favorable for the Severe Stuttering Group, promoting speech fluency. The conditions of masked and amplified auditory feedback resulted in speech benefits in both groups, decreasing the number of stuttering-like disfluencies. The speech rate was not impaired by any listening condition analyzed. Elsevier 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9422389/ /pubmed/31648949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.08.005 Text en © 2019 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Fiorin, Michele
Marconato, Eduarda
Palharini, Talissa Almeida
Picoloto, Luana Altran
Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Cardoso, Ana Claudia Vieira
Oliveira, Cristiane Moço Canhetti de
Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
title Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
title_full Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
title_fullStr Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
title_full_unstemmed Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
title_short Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
title_sort impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31648949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.08.005
work_keys_str_mv AT fiorinmichele impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering
AT marconatoeduarda impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering
AT palharinitalissaalmeida impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering
AT picolotoluanaaltran impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering
AT frizzoanaclaudiafigueiredo impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering
AT cardosoanaclaudiavieira impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering
AT oliveiracristianemococanhettide impactofauditoryfeedbackalterationsinindividualswithstuttering