Cargando…

Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study

INTRODUCTION: Tympanoplasty is a surgical procedure designed to reconstruct the mechanisms of sound transmission in the middle ear. OBJECTIVE: Analyze, from an audiological point of view, patients with chronic otitis media undergoing type 3 tympanoplasty major columella with total ossicular replacem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahmad, Fayez, Perdigão, Andréa Gonçalves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.014
_version_ 1784777844502560768
author Bahmad, Fayez
Perdigão, Andréa Gonçalves
author_facet Bahmad, Fayez
Perdigão, Andréa Gonçalves
author_sort Bahmad, Fayez
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Tympanoplasty is a surgical procedure designed to reconstruct the mechanisms of sound transmission in the middle ear. OBJECTIVE: Analyze, from an audiological point of view, patients with chronic otitis media undergoing type 3 tympanoplasty major columella with total ossicular replacement titanium prosthesis or with cartilage graft stapes columella. METHODS: This is a prospective analytical study, carried out at the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic in a tertiary care hospital, through the evaluation of 26 patients with chronic otitis media who underwent tympanoplasty using different materials for auditory rehabilitation such as titanium prostheses or cartilage autografts. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant association between the group factors (cartilage or titanium reconstruction) and preoperative variables. There was no statistically significant association between the postoperative characteristics of the patients and the type of reconstruction. Neither subjective improvement (hearing improvement) nor residual perforation were associated with a type of material. The via factor was the only one that showed a statistically significant difference once air-conduction pathway improved more than bone-conduction pathway, decreasing the air-bone gap. CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in relation to the audiometric improvement. There was hearing improvement in both groups. More studies must be done with a longer follow-up to better evaluate the outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9422578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94225782022-08-31 Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study Bahmad, Fayez Perdigão, Andréa Gonçalves Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Tympanoplasty is a surgical procedure designed to reconstruct the mechanisms of sound transmission in the middle ear. OBJECTIVE: Analyze, from an audiological point of view, patients with chronic otitis media undergoing type 3 tympanoplasty major columella with total ossicular replacement titanium prosthesis or with cartilage graft stapes columella. METHODS: This is a prospective analytical study, carried out at the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic in a tertiary care hospital, through the evaluation of 26 patients with chronic otitis media who underwent tympanoplasty using different materials for auditory rehabilitation such as titanium prostheses or cartilage autografts. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant association between the group factors (cartilage or titanium reconstruction) and preoperative variables. There was no statistically significant association between the postoperative characteristics of the patients and the type of reconstruction. Neither subjective improvement (hearing improvement) nor residual perforation were associated with a type of material. The via factor was the only one that showed a statistically significant difference once air-conduction pathway improved more than bone-conduction pathway, decreasing the air-bone gap. CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in relation to the audiometric improvement. There was hearing improvement in both groups. More studies must be done with a longer follow-up to better evaluate the outcome. Elsevier 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9422578/ /pubmed/32972867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.014 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bahmad, Fayez
Perdigão, Andréa Gonçalves
Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
title Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
title_full Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
title_fullStr Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
title_short Titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
title_sort titanium prostheses versus stapes columella type 3 tympanoplasty: a comparative prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32972867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.014
work_keys_str_mv AT bahmadfayez titaniumprosthesesversusstapescolumellatype3tympanoplastyacomparativeprospectivestudy
AT perdigaoandreagoncalves titaniumprosthesesversusstapescolumellatype3tympanoplastyacomparativeprospectivestudy