Cargando…

Vestibular status in partial deafness

INTRODUCTION: The hair cells of the cochlea and the vestibulum are closely connected and may be susceptible to the same noxious factors. The relationship between their function has been a continuing field of investigation. The indications for cochlear implantation have been broadened and now include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sosna, Magdalena, Tacikowska, Grazyna, Pietrasik, Katarzyna, Skarzynski, Henryk, Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.09.012
_version_ 1784777871866200064
author Sosna, Magdalena
Tacikowska, Grazyna
Pietrasik, Katarzyna
Skarzynski, Henryk
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
author_facet Sosna, Magdalena
Tacikowska, Grazyna
Pietrasik, Katarzyna
Skarzynski, Henryk
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
author_sort Sosna, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The hair cells of the cochlea and the vestibulum are closely connected and may be susceptible to the same noxious factors. The relationship between their function has been a continuing field of investigation. The indications for cochlear implantation have been broadened and now include the patients with partial deafness. This raises the question of their vestibular status. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is any difference between the vestibular function of patients with low frequency residual hearing and those with totally deaf ears. METHODS: A total of 360 ears with profound sensorineural hearing loss were analysed before cochlear implantation. The patients were divided into four groups, according to their low frequency residual hearing (Group 1 ‒ normal or slightly elevated low frequency residual hearing; Group 2 ‒ elevated threshold but still usable hearing at low frequencies; Group 3 – non-functional residual hearing; Group 4 ‒ no detectable hearing threshold within the limits of the audiometer). The patients underwent vestibular tests: cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, caloric test and video-head impulse test. RESULTS: The rates of elicited responses in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential were as follows: in Group 1 (59.3 %); Group 2 (57.5 %); Group 3 (35.2 %); Group 4 (7.7 %). For ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential the percentage of correct outcomes was: Group 1 (70.8 %); Group 2 (56.0 %); Group 3 (40.0 %); Group 4 (14.3 %). For the caloric test we counted normal responses in 88.9 % of Group 1; 81.6 % of Group 2; 57.9 % of Group 3; 53.3 % of Group 4. For video-head impulse test we also found markedly better results in Group1, followed by Group 2, and much worse in Group 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: Patients with partial deafness not only have a better cochlea but also better vestibular function, which needs to be protected. In summary, the better the low frequency residual hearing, the better the vestibular status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9422694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94226942022-08-31 Vestibular status in partial deafness Sosna, Magdalena Tacikowska, Grazyna Pietrasik, Katarzyna Skarzynski, Henryk Skarzynski, Piotr H. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The hair cells of the cochlea and the vestibulum are closely connected and may be susceptible to the same noxious factors. The relationship between their function has been a continuing field of investigation. The indications for cochlear implantation have been broadened and now include the patients with partial deafness. This raises the question of their vestibular status. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is any difference between the vestibular function of patients with low frequency residual hearing and those with totally deaf ears. METHODS: A total of 360 ears with profound sensorineural hearing loss were analysed before cochlear implantation. The patients were divided into four groups, according to their low frequency residual hearing (Group 1 ‒ normal or slightly elevated low frequency residual hearing; Group 2 ‒ elevated threshold but still usable hearing at low frequencies; Group 3 – non-functional residual hearing; Group 4 ‒ no detectable hearing threshold within the limits of the audiometer). The patients underwent vestibular tests: cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, caloric test and video-head impulse test. RESULTS: The rates of elicited responses in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential were as follows: in Group 1 (59.3 %); Group 2 (57.5 %); Group 3 (35.2 %); Group 4 (7.7 %). For ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential the percentage of correct outcomes was: Group 1 (70.8 %); Group 2 (56.0 %); Group 3 (40.0 %); Group 4 (14.3 %). For the caloric test we counted normal responses in 88.9 % of Group 1; 81.6 % of Group 2; 57.9 % of Group 3; 53.3 % of Group 4. For video-head impulse test we also found markedly better results in Group1, followed by Group 2, and much worse in Group 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: Patients with partial deafness not only have a better cochlea but also better vestibular function, which needs to be protected. In summary, the better the low frequency residual hearing, the better the vestibular status. Elsevier 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9422694/ /pubmed/31874831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.09.012 Text en © 2019 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sosna, Magdalena
Tacikowska, Grazyna
Pietrasik, Katarzyna
Skarzynski, Henryk
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Vestibular status in partial deafness
title Vestibular status in partial deafness
title_full Vestibular status in partial deafness
title_fullStr Vestibular status in partial deafness
title_full_unstemmed Vestibular status in partial deafness
title_short Vestibular status in partial deafness
title_sort vestibular status in partial deafness
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.09.012
work_keys_str_mv AT sosnamagdalena vestibularstatusinpartialdeafness
AT tacikowskagrazyna vestibularstatusinpartialdeafness
AT pietrasikkatarzyna vestibularstatusinpartialdeafness
AT skarzynskihenryk vestibularstatusinpartialdeafness
AT skarzynskipiotrh vestibularstatusinpartialdeafness