Cargando…

Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis

BACKGROUND: There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison. MATERIALS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sur, Roger L., Agrawal, Shashank, Eisner, Brian H., Haleblian, George E., Ganpule, Arvind P., Sabnis, Ravindra B., Desai, Mahesh R., Preminger, Glenn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0759
_version_ 1784777891296313344
author Sur, Roger L.
Agrawal, Shashank
Eisner, Brian H.
Haleblian, George E.
Ganpule, Arvind P.
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
Preminger, Glenn M.
author_facet Sur, Roger L.
Agrawal, Shashank
Eisner, Brian H.
Haleblian, George E.
Ganpule, Arvind P.
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
Preminger, Glenn M.
author_sort Sur, Roger L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted comparing SURE with basket extraction postlaser lithotripsy. SURE is performed using the CVAC™ Aspiration System, a steerable catheter (with introducer). The safety and feasibility of steering CVAC throughout the collecting system under fluoroscopy and aspirating stone fragments as it was designed to do were evaluated. Fluoroscopy time, change in hemoglobin, adverse events through 30 days, total and proportion of stone volume removed at 1 day, intraoperative stone removal rate, and stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days through CT were compared. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated (n = 9 SURE, n = 8 Basket). Baseline demographics and stone parameters were not significantly different between groups. One adverse event occurred in each group (self-limiting ileus for SURE and urinary tract infection for Basket). No mucosal injury and no contrast extravasation were observed in either group. The CVAC catheter was steered throughout the collecting system and aspirated fragments. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, change in hemoglobin, or stone removal rate between groups. SURE removed more and a greater proportion of stone volume at day 1 vs baskets (202 mm(3) vs 91 mm(3), p < 0.01 and 84% vs 56%, p = 0.022). SURE achieved 100% SFR at 30 days vs 75% for baskets, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: This initial study suggests SURE is safe, feasible, and may be more effective in stone removal postlaser lithotripsy compared to basketing. More development is needed, and larger clinical studies are underway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9422793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94227932022-08-30 Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis Sur, Roger L. Agrawal, Shashank Eisner, Brian H. Haleblian, George E. Ganpule, Arvind P. Sabnis, Ravindra B. Desai, Mahesh R. Preminger, Glenn M. J Endourol Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Procedures BACKGROUND: There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted comparing SURE with basket extraction postlaser lithotripsy. SURE is performed using the CVAC™ Aspiration System, a steerable catheter (with introducer). The safety and feasibility of steering CVAC throughout the collecting system under fluoroscopy and aspirating stone fragments as it was designed to do were evaluated. Fluoroscopy time, change in hemoglobin, adverse events through 30 days, total and proportion of stone volume removed at 1 day, intraoperative stone removal rate, and stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days through CT were compared. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated (n = 9 SURE, n = 8 Basket). Baseline demographics and stone parameters were not significantly different between groups. One adverse event occurred in each group (self-limiting ileus for SURE and urinary tract infection for Basket). No mucosal injury and no contrast extravasation were observed in either group. The CVAC catheter was steered throughout the collecting system and aspirated fragments. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, change in hemoglobin, or stone removal rate between groups. SURE removed more and a greater proportion of stone volume at day 1 vs baskets (202 mm(3) vs 91 mm(3), p < 0.01 and 84% vs 56%, p = 0.022). SURE achieved 100% SFR at 30 days vs 75% for baskets, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: This initial study suggests SURE is safe, feasible, and may be more effective in stone removal postlaser lithotripsy compared to basketing. More development is needed, and larger clinical studies are underway. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-09-01 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9422793/ /pubmed/35331002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0759 Text en © Roger L. Sur, et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Procedures
Sur, Roger L.
Agrawal, Shashank
Eisner, Brian H.
Haleblian, George E.
Ganpule, Arvind P.
Sabnis, Ravindra B.
Desai, Mahesh R.
Preminger, Glenn M.
Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis
title Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis
title_full Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis
title_fullStr Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis
title_short Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis
title_sort initial safety and feasibility of steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation: a novel approach for the treatment of urolithiasis
topic Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Procedures
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35331002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0759
work_keys_str_mv AT surrogerl initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT agrawalshashank initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT eisnerbrianh initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT halebliangeorgee initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT ganpulearvindp initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT sabnisravindrab initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT desaimaheshr initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis
AT premingerglennm initialsafetyandfeasibilityofsteerableureteroscopicrenalevacuationanovelapproachforthetreatmentofurolithiasis