Cargando…

Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Ana Paula, Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo, Félix-da-Silva, Carina, Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer, de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B, Fontenelle, Leonardo F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059232
_version_ 1784777903150465024
author Ribeiro, Ana Paula
Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo
Félix-da-Silva, Carina
Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer
de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B
Fontenelle, Leonardo F
author_facet Ribeiro, Ana Paula
Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo
Félix-da-Silva, Carina
Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer
de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B
Fontenelle, Leonardo F
author_sort Ribeiro, Ana Paula
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both groups of disorders. The present study will describe the research protocol of a scoping review of the literature on self-report scales and questionnaires that tap dysfunctional constructs that underlie OCRDs and DABs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a scoping review on self-report tools and questionnaires that assess OCRDs and DABs-related constructs. The scoping review will select sources in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designed according to the Population, Concept, Context, Types of source framework. Two reviewers will screen independently titles, abstracts and full texts to determine the eligibility of articles. A methodological framework including six stages steps ((1) identifying a research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarising and reporting the result) will be used, and the findings will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Information extracted will be collated, and quantitative results will be presented using descriptive statistics such as percentages, tables, charts and flow diagrams as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for conducting this scoping review is not required, as this study will involve secondary analysis of existing literature. The researchers will disseminate the study results via conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/UJ7G5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9422856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94228562022-09-12 Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol Ribeiro, Ana Paula Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo Félix-da-Silva, Carina Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B Fontenelle, Leonardo F BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both groups of disorders. The present study will describe the research protocol of a scoping review of the literature on self-report scales and questionnaires that tap dysfunctional constructs that underlie OCRDs and DABs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a scoping review on self-report tools and questionnaires that assess OCRDs and DABs-related constructs. The scoping review will select sources in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designed according to the Population, Concept, Context, Types of source framework. Two reviewers will screen independently titles, abstracts and full texts to determine the eligibility of articles. A methodological framework including six stages steps ((1) identifying a research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarising and reporting the result) will be used, and the findings will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Information extracted will be collated, and quantitative results will be presented using descriptive statistics such as percentages, tables, charts and flow diagrams as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for conducting this scoping review is not required, as this study will involve secondary analysis of existing literature. The researchers will disseminate the study results via conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/UJ7G5. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9422856/ /pubmed/36028270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059232 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Ribeiro, Ana Paula
Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo
Félix-da-Silva, Carina
Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer
de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B
Fontenelle, Leonardo F
Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
title Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
title_full Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
title_short Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
title_sort subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059232
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeiroanapaula subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol
AT piquetpessoamarcelo subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol
AT felixdasilvacarina subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol
AT muhlbauerjuliafernandeseigenheer subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol
AT desallesandradejulianab subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol
AT fontenelleleonardof subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol