Cargando…
Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059232 |
_version_ | 1784777903150465024 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro, Ana Paula Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo Félix-da-Silva, Carina Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B Fontenelle, Leonardo F |
author_facet | Ribeiro, Ana Paula Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo Félix-da-Silva, Carina Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B Fontenelle, Leonardo F |
author_sort | Ribeiro, Ana Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both groups of disorders. The present study will describe the research protocol of a scoping review of the literature on self-report scales and questionnaires that tap dysfunctional constructs that underlie OCRDs and DABs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a scoping review on self-report tools and questionnaires that assess OCRDs and DABs-related constructs. The scoping review will select sources in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designed according to the Population, Concept, Context, Types of source framework. Two reviewers will screen independently titles, abstracts and full texts to determine the eligibility of articles. A methodological framework including six stages steps ((1) identifying a research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarising and reporting the result) will be used, and the findings will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Information extracted will be collated, and quantitative results will be presented using descriptive statistics such as percentages, tables, charts and flow diagrams as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for conducting this scoping review is not required, as this study will involve secondary analysis of existing literature. The researchers will disseminate the study results via conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/UJ7G5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9422856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94228562022-09-12 Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol Ribeiro, Ana Paula Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo Félix-da-Silva, Carina Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B Fontenelle, Leonardo F BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs) and disorders due to addictive behaviours (DABs) are prevalent conditions that share behavioural and neurobiological characteristics. The Research Domain Criteria lists a series of constructs whose dysfunctions may be present in both groups of disorders. The present study will describe the research protocol of a scoping review of the literature on self-report scales and questionnaires that tap dysfunctional constructs that underlie OCRDs and DABs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a scoping review on self-report tools and questionnaires that assess OCRDs and DABs-related constructs. The scoping review will select sources in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designed according to the Population, Concept, Context, Types of source framework. Two reviewers will screen independently titles, abstracts and full texts to determine the eligibility of articles. A methodological framework including six stages steps ((1) identifying a research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarising and reporting the result) will be used, and the findings will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Information extracted will be collated, and quantitative results will be presented using descriptive statistics such as percentages, tables, charts and flow diagrams as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for conducting this scoping review is not required, as this study will involve secondary analysis of existing literature. The researchers will disseminate the study results via conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/UJ7G5. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9422856/ /pubmed/36028270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059232 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Ribeiro, Ana Paula Piquet-Pessôa, Marcelo Félix-da-Silva, Carina Mühlbauer, Julia Fernandes Eigenheer de-Salles-Andrade, Juliana B Fontenelle, Leonardo F Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
title | Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeiroanapaula subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol AT piquetpessoamarcelo subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol AT felixdasilvacarina subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol AT muhlbauerjuliafernandeseigenheer subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol AT desallesandradejulianab subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol AT fontenelleleonardof subjectiveassessmentsofresearchdomaincriteriaconstructsinaddictionandcompulsivedisordersascopingreviewprotocol |