Cargando…

Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective

OBJECTIVES: English local authorities (LAs) are interested in reducing alcohol-related harms and may use discretionary powers such as the Late Night Levy (LNL) to do so. This study aims to describe how system stakeholders hypothesise the levy may generate changes and to explore how the system, its a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGill, Elizabeth, Marks, Dalya, Petticrew, Mark, Egan, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050913
_version_ 1784777908266467328
author McGill, Elizabeth
Marks, Dalya
Petticrew, Mark
Egan, Matt
author_facet McGill, Elizabeth
Marks, Dalya
Petticrew, Mark
Egan, Matt
author_sort McGill, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: English local authorities (LAs) are interested in reducing alcohol-related harms and may use discretionary powers such as the Late Night Levy (LNL) to do so. This study aims to describe how system stakeholders hypothesise the levy may generate changes and to explore how the system, its actors and the intervention adapt and co-evolve over time. DESIGN: A process evaluation from a complex systems perspective, using qualitative methods. SETTING: A London LA with high densities of residential and commercial properties, which implemented the LNL in 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Data were generated through interviews with LNL implementers and alcohol consumers, observations in bars and during LNL patrols and documentary review. INTERVENTION: The LNL allows LAs to charge late-night alcohol retailers an annual fee (£299–£4440) to manage and police the night-time economy (NTE). RESULTS: When the LNL was being considered, stakeholders from different interest groups advanced diverse opinions about its likely impacts while rarely referencing supporting research evidence. Proponents of the levy argued it could reduce crime and anti-social behaviour by providing additional funds to police and manage the NTE. Critics of the levy hypothesised adverse consequences linked to claims that the intervention would force venues to vary their hours or close, cluster closing times, reduce NTE diversity and undermine public–private partnerships. In the first 2 years, levy-funded patrols developed relationships with the licensed trade and the public. The LNL did not undermine public–private partnerships and while some premises varied their hours, these changes did not undermine the intervention’s viability, nor significantly cluster venue closing times, nor obviously damage the area’s reputation for having a diverse NTE. CONCLUSIONS: This study applies a framework for process evaluation from a complex systems perspective. The evaluation could be extended to measure alcohol-related outcomes and to consider the interplay between the national and local systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9422880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94228802022-09-12 Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective McGill, Elizabeth Marks, Dalya Petticrew, Mark Egan, Matt BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: English local authorities (LAs) are interested in reducing alcohol-related harms and may use discretionary powers such as the Late Night Levy (LNL) to do so. This study aims to describe how system stakeholders hypothesise the levy may generate changes and to explore how the system, its actors and the intervention adapt and co-evolve over time. DESIGN: A process evaluation from a complex systems perspective, using qualitative methods. SETTING: A London LA with high densities of residential and commercial properties, which implemented the LNL in 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Data were generated through interviews with LNL implementers and alcohol consumers, observations in bars and during LNL patrols and documentary review. INTERVENTION: The LNL allows LAs to charge late-night alcohol retailers an annual fee (£299–£4440) to manage and police the night-time economy (NTE). RESULTS: When the LNL was being considered, stakeholders from different interest groups advanced diverse opinions about its likely impacts while rarely referencing supporting research evidence. Proponents of the levy argued it could reduce crime and anti-social behaviour by providing additional funds to police and manage the NTE. Critics of the levy hypothesised adverse consequences linked to claims that the intervention would force venues to vary their hours or close, cluster closing times, reduce NTE diversity and undermine public–private partnerships. In the first 2 years, levy-funded patrols developed relationships with the licensed trade and the public. The LNL did not undermine public–private partnerships and while some premises varied their hours, these changes did not undermine the intervention’s viability, nor significantly cluster venue closing times, nor obviously damage the area’s reputation for having a diverse NTE. CONCLUSIONS: This study applies a framework for process evaluation from a complex systems perspective. The evaluation could be extended to measure alcohol-related outcomes and to consider the interplay between the national and local systems. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9422880/ /pubmed/36008081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050913 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
McGill, Elizabeth
Marks, Dalya
Petticrew, Mark
Egan, Matt
Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
title Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
title_full Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
title_fullStr Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
title_full_unstemmed Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
title_short Addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
title_sort addressing alcohol-related harms in the local night-time economy: a qualitative process evaluation from a complex systems perspective
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050913
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgillelizabeth addressingalcoholrelatedharmsinthelocalnighttimeeconomyaqualitativeprocessevaluationfromacomplexsystemsperspective
AT marksdalya addressingalcoholrelatedharmsinthelocalnighttimeeconomyaqualitativeprocessevaluationfromacomplexsystemsperspective
AT petticrewmark addressingalcoholrelatedharmsinthelocalnighttimeeconomyaqualitativeprocessevaluationfromacomplexsystemsperspective
AT eganmatt addressingalcoholrelatedharmsinthelocalnighttimeeconomyaqualitativeprocessevaluationfromacomplexsystemsperspective