Cargando…
Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018)
BACKGROUND: Data on awareness of HIV status among people living with HIV (PLHIV) are critical to estimating progress toward epidemic control. To ascertain the accuracy of self-reported HIV status and antiretroviral drug (ARV) use in the Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS), we compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273748 |
_version_ | 1784778070169747456 |
---|---|
author | Jahun, Ibrahim Ehoche, Akipu Bamidele, Moyosola Yakubu, Aminu Bronson, Megan Dalhatu, Ibrahim Greby, Stacie Agbakwuru, Chinedu Baffa, Ibrahim Iwara, Emem Alagi, Matthias Asaolu, Olugbenga Mukhtar, Ahmed Ikpeazu, Akudo Nzelu, Charles Tapdiyel, Jelpe Bassey, Orji Abimiku, Alash’le Patel, Hetal Parekh, Bharat Aliyu, Sani Aliyu, Gambo Charurat, Manhattan Swaminathan, Mahesh |
author_facet | Jahun, Ibrahim Ehoche, Akipu Bamidele, Moyosola Yakubu, Aminu Bronson, Megan Dalhatu, Ibrahim Greby, Stacie Agbakwuru, Chinedu Baffa, Ibrahim Iwara, Emem Alagi, Matthias Asaolu, Olugbenga Mukhtar, Ahmed Ikpeazu, Akudo Nzelu, Charles Tapdiyel, Jelpe Bassey, Orji Abimiku, Alash’le Patel, Hetal Parekh, Bharat Aliyu, Sani Aliyu, Gambo Charurat, Manhattan Swaminathan, Mahesh |
author_sort | Jahun, Ibrahim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data on awareness of HIV status among people living with HIV (PLHIV) are critical to estimating progress toward epidemic control. To ascertain the accuracy of self-reported HIV status and antiretroviral drug (ARV) use in the Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS), we compared self-reported HIV status with HIV rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results and self-reported ARV use with detectable blood ARV levels. METHODS: On the basis of responses and test results, participants were categorized by HIV status and ARV use. Self-reported HIV status and ARV use performance characteristics were determined by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Proportions and other analyses were weighted to account for complex survey design. RESULTS: During NAIIS, 186,405 participants consented for interview out of which 58,646 reported knowing their HIV status. Of the 959 (weighted, 1.5%) who self-reported being HIV-positive, 849 (92.1%) tested HIV positive and 64 (7.9%) tested HIV negative via RDT and polymerase chain reaction test for discordant positive results. Of the 849 who tested HIV positive, 743 (89.8%) reported using ARV and 72 (10.2%) reported not using ARV. Of 57,687 who self-reported being HIV negative, 686 (1.2%) tested HIV positive via RDT, with ARV biomarkers detected among 195 (25.1%). ARV was detected among 94.5% of those who self-reported using ARV and among 42.0% of those who self-reported not using ARV. Overall, self-reported HIV status had sensitivity of 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.4%–56.0%) with specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.8%–99.9%). Self-reported ARV use had sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 93.6%–96.7%) and specificity of 54.5% (95% CI: 48.8%–70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported HIV status and ARV use screening tests were found to be low-validity measures during NAIIS. Laboratory tests to confirm self-reported information may be necessary to determine accurate HIV and clinical status for HIV studies in Nigeria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9423665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94236652022-08-30 Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) Jahun, Ibrahim Ehoche, Akipu Bamidele, Moyosola Yakubu, Aminu Bronson, Megan Dalhatu, Ibrahim Greby, Stacie Agbakwuru, Chinedu Baffa, Ibrahim Iwara, Emem Alagi, Matthias Asaolu, Olugbenga Mukhtar, Ahmed Ikpeazu, Akudo Nzelu, Charles Tapdiyel, Jelpe Bassey, Orji Abimiku, Alash’le Patel, Hetal Parekh, Bharat Aliyu, Sani Aliyu, Gambo Charurat, Manhattan Swaminathan, Mahesh PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Data on awareness of HIV status among people living with HIV (PLHIV) are critical to estimating progress toward epidemic control. To ascertain the accuracy of self-reported HIV status and antiretroviral drug (ARV) use in the Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS), we compared self-reported HIV status with HIV rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results and self-reported ARV use with detectable blood ARV levels. METHODS: On the basis of responses and test results, participants were categorized by HIV status and ARV use. Self-reported HIV status and ARV use performance characteristics were determined by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Proportions and other analyses were weighted to account for complex survey design. RESULTS: During NAIIS, 186,405 participants consented for interview out of which 58,646 reported knowing their HIV status. Of the 959 (weighted, 1.5%) who self-reported being HIV-positive, 849 (92.1%) tested HIV positive and 64 (7.9%) tested HIV negative via RDT and polymerase chain reaction test for discordant positive results. Of the 849 who tested HIV positive, 743 (89.8%) reported using ARV and 72 (10.2%) reported not using ARV. Of 57,687 who self-reported being HIV negative, 686 (1.2%) tested HIV positive via RDT, with ARV biomarkers detected among 195 (25.1%). ARV was detected among 94.5% of those who self-reported using ARV and among 42.0% of those who self-reported not using ARV. Overall, self-reported HIV status had sensitivity of 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.4%–56.0%) with specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.8%–99.9%). Self-reported ARV use had sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 93.6%–96.7%) and specificity of 54.5% (95% CI: 48.8%–70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported HIV status and ARV use screening tests were found to be low-validity measures during NAIIS. Laboratory tests to confirm self-reported information may be necessary to determine accurate HIV and clinical status for HIV studies in Nigeria. Public Library of Science 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9423665/ /pubmed/36037201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273748 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jahun, Ibrahim Ehoche, Akipu Bamidele, Moyosola Yakubu, Aminu Bronson, Megan Dalhatu, Ibrahim Greby, Stacie Agbakwuru, Chinedu Baffa, Ibrahim Iwara, Emem Alagi, Matthias Asaolu, Olugbenga Mukhtar, Ahmed Ikpeazu, Akudo Nzelu, Charles Tapdiyel, Jelpe Bassey, Orji Abimiku, Alash’le Patel, Hetal Parekh, Bharat Aliyu, Sani Aliyu, Gambo Charurat, Manhattan Swaminathan, Mahesh Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) |
title | Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) |
title_full | Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) |
title_short | Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018) |
title_sort | evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported hiv and antiretroviral therapy status in the nigeria aids indicator and impact survey (2018) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jahunibrahim evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT ehocheakipu evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT bamidelemoyosola evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT yakubuaminu evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT bronsonmegan evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT dalhatuibrahim evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT grebystacie evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT agbakwuruchinedu evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT baffaibrahim evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT iwaraemem evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT alagimatthias evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT asaoluolugbenga evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT mukhtarahmed evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT ikpeazuakudo evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT nzelucharles evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT tapdiyeljelpe evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT basseyorji evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT abimikualashle evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT patelhetal evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT parekhbharat evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT aliyusani evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT aliyugambo evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT charuratmanhattan evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 AT swaminathanmahesh evaluationofaccuracyandperformanceofselfreportedhivandantiretroviraltherapystatusinthenigeriaaidsindicatorandimpactsurvey2018 |