Cargando…

Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the specific engagement activities pursued and associated impacts of patient engagement in research in Canada remains nascent. This study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of projects funded by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chudyk, Anna Maria, Stoddard, Roger, McCleary, Nicola, Duhamel, Todd A., Shimmin, Carolyn, Hickes, Serena, Schultz, Annette S. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4
_version_ 1784778077720543232
author Chudyk, Anna Maria
Stoddard, Roger
McCleary, Nicola
Duhamel, Todd A.
Shimmin, Carolyn
Hickes, Serena
Schultz, Annette S. H.
author_facet Chudyk, Anna Maria
Stoddard, Roger
McCleary, Nicola
Duhamel, Todd A.
Shimmin, Carolyn
Hickes, Serena
Schultz, Annette S. H.
author_sort Chudyk, Anna Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the specific engagement activities pursued and associated impacts of patient engagement in research in Canada remains nascent. This study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of projects funded by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional online survey of academic researchers and patient partners engaging in projects funded through 13 SPOR funding calls (2014–2019). Patient engagement activities and impacts were measured using a self-developed survey. Thematic analysis was used to describe engagement activities and impacts. RESULTS: 66 of 511 academic researchers and 20 of 28 patient partners contacted completed the survey and were included in analyses. Respondents reported that patient partners were engaged in seven types of activities across the research cycle: (a) sharing experiences/giving advice, (b) identifying the research focus/methods, (c) developing/revising aspects of the project, (d) conducting research activities, (e) study participation, (f) presenting on behalf of the project, and (g) other grant development or knowledge translation activities. Engagement was associated with six different types of impacts related to knowledge, outputs, or directions being (a) created, (b) moulded, (c) confirmed, or (d) chosen/prioritized, (e) perceived success of the research, and (f) minimal/negative impacts on the research. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents information on different ways that patient partners were engaged in SPOR-funded research and the potential impacts of these activities. This knowledge base is imperative to the future of patient engagement in research, including the planning and evaluation of future studies that engage patients as active shapers of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9423700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94237002022-08-30 Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences Chudyk, Anna Maria Stoddard, Roger McCleary, Nicola Duhamel, Todd A. Shimmin, Carolyn Hickes, Serena Schultz, Annette S. H. Res Involv Engagem Research BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the specific engagement activities pursued and associated impacts of patient engagement in research in Canada remains nascent. This study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of projects funded by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional online survey of academic researchers and patient partners engaging in projects funded through 13 SPOR funding calls (2014–2019). Patient engagement activities and impacts were measured using a self-developed survey. Thematic analysis was used to describe engagement activities and impacts. RESULTS: 66 of 511 academic researchers and 20 of 28 patient partners contacted completed the survey and were included in analyses. Respondents reported that patient partners were engaged in seven types of activities across the research cycle: (a) sharing experiences/giving advice, (b) identifying the research focus/methods, (c) developing/revising aspects of the project, (d) conducting research activities, (e) study participation, (f) presenting on behalf of the project, and (g) other grant development or knowledge translation activities. Engagement was associated with six different types of impacts related to knowledge, outputs, or directions being (a) created, (b) moulded, (c) confirmed, or (d) chosen/prioritized, (e) perceived success of the research, and (f) minimal/negative impacts on the research. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents information on different ways that patient partners were engaged in SPOR-funded research and the potential impacts of these activities. This knowledge base is imperative to the future of patient engagement in research, including the planning and evaluation of future studies that engage patients as active shapers of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4. BioMed Central 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9423700/ /pubmed/36038887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chudyk, Anna Maria
Stoddard, Roger
McCleary, Nicola
Duhamel, Todd A.
Shimmin, Carolyn
Hickes, Serena
Schultz, Annette S. H.
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
title Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
title_full Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
title_fullStr Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
title_full_unstemmed Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
title_short Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
title_sort activities and impacts of patient engagement in cihr spor funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chudykannamaria activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences
AT stoddardroger activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences
AT mcclearynicola activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences
AT duhameltodda activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences
AT shimmincarolyn activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences
AT hickesserena activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences
AT schultzannettesh activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences