Cargando…
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the specific engagement activities pursued and associated impacts of patient engagement in research in Canada remains nascent. This study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of projects funded by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4 |
_version_ | 1784778077720543232 |
---|---|
author | Chudyk, Anna Maria Stoddard, Roger McCleary, Nicola Duhamel, Todd A. Shimmin, Carolyn Hickes, Serena Schultz, Annette S. H. |
author_facet | Chudyk, Anna Maria Stoddard, Roger McCleary, Nicola Duhamel, Todd A. Shimmin, Carolyn Hickes, Serena Schultz, Annette S. H. |
author_sort | Chudyk, Anna Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the specific engagement activities pursued and associated impacts of patient engagement in research in Canada remains nascent. This study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of projects funded by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional online survey of academic researchers and patient partners engaging in projects funded through 13 SPOR funding calls (2014–2019). Patient engagement activities and impacts were measured using a self-developed survey. Thematic analysis was used to describe engagement activities and impacts. RESULTS: 66 of 511 academic researchers and 20 of 28 patient partners contacted completed the survey and were included in analyses. Respondents reported that patient partners were engaged in seven types of activities across the research cycle: (a) sharing experiences/giving advice, (b) identifying the research focus/methods, (c) developing/revising aspects of the project, (d) conducting research activities, (e) study participation, (f) presenting on behalf of the project, and (g) other grant development or knowledge translation activities. Engagement was associated with six different types of impacts related to knowledge, outputs, or directions being (a) created, (b) moulded, (c) confirmed, or (d) chosen/prioritized, (e) perceived success of the research, and (f) minimal/negative impacts on the research. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents information on different ways that patient partners were engaged in SPOR-funded research and the potential impacts of these activities. This knowledge base is imperative to the future of patient engagement in research, including the planning and evaluation of future studies that engage patients as active shapers of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9423700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94237002022-08-30 Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences Chudyk, Anna Maria Stoddard, Roger McCleary, Nicola Duhamel, Todd A. Shimmin, Carolyn Hickes, Serena Schultz, Annette S. H. Res Involv Engagem Research BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the specific engagement activities pursued and associated impacts of patient engagement in research in Canada remains nascent. This study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of projects funded by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional online survey of academic researchers and patient partners engaging in projects funded through 13 SPOR funding calls (2014–2019). Patient engagement activities and impacts were measured using a self-developed survey. Thematic analysis was used to describe engagement activities and impacts. RESULTS: 66 of 511 academic researchers and 20 of 28 patient partners contacted completed the survey and were included in analyses. Respondents reported that patient partners were engaged in seven types of activities across the research cycle: (a) sharing experiences/giving advice, (b) identifying the research focus/methods, (c) developing/revising aspects of the project, (d) conducting research activities, (e) study participation, (f) presenting on behalf of the project, and (g) other grant development or knowledge translation activities. Engagement was associated with six different types of impacts related to knowledge, outputs, or directions being (a) created, (b) moulded, (c) confirmed, or (d) chosen/prioritized, (e) perceived success of the research, and (f) minimal/negative impacts on the research. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents information on different ways that patient partners were engaged in SPOR-funded research and the potential impacts of these activities. This knowledge base is imperative to the future of patient engagement in research, including the planning and evaluation of future studies that engage patients as active shapers of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4. BioMed Central 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9423700/ /pubmed/36038887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chudyk, Anna Maria Stoddard, Roger McCleary, Nicola Duhamel, Todd A. Shimmin, Carolyn Hickes, Serena Schultz, Annette S. H. Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
title | Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
title_full | Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
title_fullStr | Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
title_short | Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
title_sort | activities and impacts of patient engagement in cihr spor funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chudykannamaria activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences AT stoddardroger activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences AT mcclearynicola activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences AT duhameltodda activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences AT shimmincarolyn activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences AT hickesserena activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences AT schultzannettesh activitiesandimpactsofpatientengagementincihrsporfundedresearchacrosssectionalsurveyofacademicresearcherandpatientpartnerexperiences |