Cargando…
Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing
Neurons are embedded in complex networks, where they participate in repetitive, coordinated interactions with other neurons. Neuronal spike timing is thus predictably constrained by a range of ionic currents that shape activity at both short (milliseconds) and longer (tens to hundreds of millisecond...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Physiological Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00423.2021 |
_version_ | 1784778091568037888 |
---|---|
author | Rivière, Pamela D. Schamberg, Gabriel Coleman, Todd P. Rangel, Lara M. |
author_facet | Rivière, Pamela D. Schamberg, Gabriel Coleman, Todd P. Rangel, Lara M. |
author_sort | Rivière, Pamela D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neurons are embedded in complex networks, where they participate in repetitive, coordinated interactions with other neurons. Neuronal spike timing is thus predictably constrained by a range of ionic currents that shape activity at both short (milliseconds) and longer (tens to hundreds of milliseconds) timescales, but we lack analytical tools to rigorously identify these relationships. Here, we innovate a modeling approach to test the relationship between oscillations in the local field potential (LFP) and neuronal spike timing. We use kernel density estimation to relate single neuron spike timing and the phase of LFP rhythms (in simulated and hippocampal CA1 neuronal spike trains). We then combine phase and short (3 ms) spike history information within a logistic regression framework (“phaseSH models”), and show that models that leverage refractory constraints and oscillatory phase information can effectively test whether—and the degree to which—rhythmic currents (as measured from the LFP) reliably explain variance in neuronal spike trains. This approach allows researchers to systematically test the relationship between oscillatory activity and neuronal spiking dynamics as they unfold over time and as they shift to adapt to distinct behavioral conditions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Statistical models that incorporate neural spiking history and relationships to the phase of ongoing oscillations in the local field potential robustly capture and predict neuronal engagement in rhythmic processes. These models constitute a powerful tool to systematically test explicit hypotheses regarding the specific rhythmic currents that constrain neural spiking activity over time and during different behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9423776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Physiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94237762022-09-06 Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing Rivière, Pamela D. Schamberg, Gabriel Coleman, Todd P. Rangel, Lara M. J Neurophysiol Innovative Methodology Neurons are embedded in complex networks, where they participate in repetitive, coordinated interactions with other neurons. Neuronal spike timing is thus predictably constrained by a range of ionic currents that shape activity at both short (milliseconds) and longer (tens to hundreds of milliseconds) timescales, but we lack analytical tools to rigorously identify these relationships. Here, we innovate a modeling approach to test the relationship between oscillations in the local field potential (LFP) and neuronal spike timing. We use kernel density estimation to relate single neuron spike timing and the phase of LFP rhythms (in simulated and hippocampal CA1 neuronal spike trains). We then combine phase and short (3 ms) spike history information within a logistic regression framework (“phaseSH models”), and show that models that leverage refractory constraints and oscillatory phase information can effectively test whether—and the degree to which—rhythmic currents (as measured from the LFP) reliably explain variance in neuronal spike trains. This approach allows researchers to systematically test the relationship between oscillatory activity and neuronal spiking dynamics as they unfold over time and as they shift to adapt to distinct behavioral conditions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Statistical models that incorporate neural spiking history and relationships to the phase of ongoing oscillations in the local field potential robustly capture and predict neuronal engagement in rhythmic processes. These models constitute a powerful tool to systematically test explicit hypotheses regarding the specific rhythmic currents that constrain neural spiking activity over time and during different behaviors. American Physiological Society 2022-09-01 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9423776/ /pubmed/35858125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00423.2021 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Published by the American Physiological Society. |
spellingShingle | Innovative Methodology Rivière, Pamela D. Schamberg, Gabriel Coleman, Todd P. Rangel, Lara M. Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
title | Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
title_full | Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
title_fullStr | Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
title_short | Modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
title_sort | modeling relationships between rhythmic processes and neuronal spike timing |
topic | Innovative Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00423.2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rivierepamelad modelingrelationshipsbetweenrhythmicprocessesandneuronalspiketiming AT schamberggabriel modelingrelationshipsbetweenrhythmicprocessesandneuronalspiketiming AT colemantoddp modelingrelationshipsbetweenrhythmicprocessesandneuronalspiketiming AT rangellaram modelingrelationshipsbetweenrhythmicprocessesandneuronalspiketiming |