Cargando…
Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use
PURPOSE: To implement and validate an existing algorithm for automatic delineation of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on a local single-center dataset. METHODS: We implemented a white matter hyperintensity segmentation model, based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34542644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01089-z |
_version_ | 1784778173201776640 |
---|---|
author | Hindsholm, Amalie Monberg Cramer, Stig Præstekjær Simonsen, Helle Juhl Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup Andersen, Flemming Højgaard, Liselotte Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Lindberg, Ulrich |
author_facet | Hindsholm, Amalie Monberg Cramer, Stig Præstekjær Simonsen, Helle Juhl Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup Andersen, Flemming Højgaard, Liselotte Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Lindberg, Ulrich |
author_sort | Hindsholm, Amalie Monberg |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To implement and validate an existing algorithm for automatic delineation of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on a local single-center dataset. METHODS: We implemented a white matter hyperintensity segmentation model, based on a 2D convolutional neural network, using the conventional T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI sequence as input. The model was adapted for delineation of MS lesions by further training on a local dataset of 93 MS patients with a total of 3040 lesions. A quantitative evaluation was performed on ten test patients, in which model-generated masks were compared to manually delineated masks from two expert delineators. A subsequent qualitative evaluation of the implemented model was performed by two expert delineators, in which generated delineation masks on a clinical dataset of 53 patients were rated acceptable (< 10% errors) or unacceptable (> 10% errors) based on the total number of true lesions. RESULTS: The quantitative evaluation resulted in an average accuracy score (F1) of 0.71, recall of 0.77 and dice similarity coefficient of 0.62. Our implemented model obtained the highest scores in all three metrics, when compared to three out of the box lesion segmentation models. In the clinical evaluation an average of 94% of our 53 model-generated masks were rated acceptable. CONCLUSION: After adaptation to our local dataset, the implemented segmentation model was able to delineate MS lesions with a high clinical value as rated by delineation experts while outperforming popular out of the box applications. This serves as a promising step towards implementation of automatic lesion delineation in our MS clinic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-021-01089-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9424132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94241322022-08-31 Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use Hindsholm, Amalie Monberg Cramer, Stig Præstekjær Simonsen, Helle Juhl Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup Andersen, Flemming Højgaard, Liselotte Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Lindberg, Ulrich Clin Neuroradiol Original Article PURPOSE: To implement and validate an existing algorithm for automatic delineation of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on a local single-center dataset. METHODS: We implemented a white matter hyperintensity segmentation model, based on a 2D convolutional neural network, using the conventional T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI sequence as input. The model was adapted for delineation of MS lesions by further training on a local dataset of 93 MS patients with a total of 3040 lesions. A quantitative evaluation was performed on ten test patients, in which model-generated masks were compared to manually delineated masks from two expert delineators. A subsequent qualitative evaluation of the implemented model was performed by two expert delineators, in which generated delineation masks on a clinical dataset of 53 patients were rated acceptable (< 10% errors) or unacceptable (> 10% errors) based on the total number of true lesions. RESULTS: The quantitative evaluation resulted in an average accuracy score (F1) of 0.71, recall of 0.77 and dice similarity coefficient of 0.62. Our implemented model obtained the highest scores in all three metrics, when compared to three out of the box lesion segmentation models. In the clinical evaluation an average of 94% of our 53 model-generated masks were rated acceptable. CONCLUSION: After adaptation to our local dataset, the implemented segmentation model was able to delineate MS lesions with a high clinical value as rated by delineation experts while outperforming popular out of the box applications. This serves as a promising step towards implementation of automatic lesion delineation in our MS clinic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-021-01089-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9424132/ /pubmed/34542644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01089-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hindsholm, Amalie Monberg Cramer, Stig Præstekjær Simonsen, Helle Juhl Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup Andersen, Flemming Højgaard, Liselotte Ladefoged, Claes Nøhr Lindberg, Ulrich Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use |
title | Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use |
title_full | Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use |
title_short | Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use |
title_sort | assessment of artificial intelligence automatic multiple sclerosis lesion delineation tool for clinical use |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34542644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01089-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hindsholmamaliemonberg assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT cramerstigpræstekjær assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT simonsenhellejuhl assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT frederiksenjettelautrup assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT andersenflemming assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT højgaardliselotte assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT ladefogedclaesnøhr assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse AT lindbergulrich assessmentofartificialintelligenceautomaticmultiplesclerosislesiondelineationtoolforclinicaluse |