Cargando…

Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses

PURPOSE: Metatarsal pads are prescribed to decrease forefoot plantar pressure. However, the appropriate metatarsal pad placement location remains a debated issue. We aimed to identify the most effective insole design that reduces forefoot plantar pressure and determine the optimal position for metat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Tae Im, Lee, Eun Chae, Son, Nak Hoon, Sohn, Min Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.9.864
_version_ 1784778298880950272
author Yi, Tae Im
Lee, Eun Chae
Son, Nak Hoon
Sohn, Min Kyun
author_facet Yi, Tae Im
Lee, Eun Chae
Son, Nak Hoon
Sohn, Min Kyun
author_sort Yi, Tae Im
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Metatarsal pads are prescribed to decrease forefoot plantar pressure. However, the appropriate metatarsal pad placement location remains a debated issue. We aimed to identify the most effective insole design that reduces forefoot plantar pressure and determine the optimal position for metatarsal pad placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 16 healthy adult volunteers, and measured their plantar pressure data during walking while using an in-shoe system. The volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four insole conditions: 1/16-inch insole (i.e., control), 1/4-inch soft plastazote (SP) flat insole, metatarsal pad positioned proximal to the metatarsal head (MTH) on the control insole (P0), and metatarsal pad positioned 10 mm distal from the proximal border of the MTH on the control insole (P10). A masking protocol was created by dividing the forefoot into three subareas, distal to the MTH (dMTH), beneath to the MTH (bMTH), and proximal to the MTH (pMTH). The participants reported their comfort level for each insole using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The SP flat insole and metatarsal pads both had a forefoot plantar pressure-reducing effect and provided insole comfort. Of the three insole designs, the SP flat insole was the most effective. No clear difference existed in efficacy in terms of the location of the metatarsal pad placement. CONCLUSION: Considering the possibility of discomfort caused by improper metatarsal pad placement, the SP that increases shock absorption may be more clinically useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9424780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94247802022-09-01 Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses Yi, Tae Im Lee, Eun Chae Son, Nak Hoon Sohn, Min Kyun Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Metatarsal pads are prescribed to decrease forefoot plantar pressure. However, the appropriate metatarsal pad placement location remains a debated issue. We aimed to identify the most effective insole design that reduces forefoot plantar pressure and determine the optimal position for metatarsal pad placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 16 healthy adult volunteers, and measured their plantar pressure data during walking while using an in-shoe system. The volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four insole conditions: 1/16-inch insole (i.e., control), 1/4-inch soft plastazote (SP) flat insole, metatarsal pad positioned proximal to the metatarsal head (MTH) on the control insole (P0), and metatarsal pad positioned 10 mm distal from the proximal border of the MTH on the control insole (P10). A masking protocol was created by dividing the forefoot into three subareas, distal to the MTH (dMTH), beneath to the MTH (bMTH), and proximal to the MTH (pMTH). The participants reported their comfort level for each insole using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The SP flat insole and metatarsal pads both had a forefoot plantar pressure-reducing effect and provided insole comfort. Of the three insole designs, the SP flat insole was the most effective. No clear difference existed in efficacy in terms of the location of the metatarsal pad placement. CONCLUSION: Considering the possibility of discomfort caused by improper metatarsal pad placement, the SP that increases shock absorption may be more clinically useful. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022-09 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9424780/ /pubmed/36031787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.9.864 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yi, Tae Im
Lee, Eun Chae
Son, Nak Hoon
Sohn, Min Kyun
Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses
title Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses
title_full Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses
title_fullStr Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses
title_short Comparison of the Forefoot Pressure-Relieving Effects of Foot Orthoses
title_sort comparison of the forefoot pressure-relieving effects of foot orthoses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36031787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.9.864
work_keys_str_mv AT yitaeim comparisonoftheforefootpressurerelievingeffectsoffootorthoses
AT leeeunchae comparisonoftheforefootpressurerelievingeffectsoffootorthoses
AT sonnakhoon comparisonoftheforefootpressurerelievingeffectsoffootorthoses
AT sohnminkyun comparisonoftheforefootpressurerelievingeffectsoffootorthoses