Cargando…
Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients’ social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36040537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z |
_version_ | 1784778303943475200 |
---|---|
author | Aceves, Benjamin Gunn, Rose Pisciotta, Maura Razon, Na’amah Cottrell, Erika Hessler, Danielle Gold, Rachel Gottlieb, Laura M. |
author_facet | Aceves, Benjamin Gunn, Rose Pisciotta, Maura Razon, Na’amah Cottrell, Erika Hessler, Danielle Gold, Rachel Gottlieb, Laura M. |
author_sort | Aceves, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients’ social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these “social care” initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories. RECENT FINDINGS: We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. SUMMARY: Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9424801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94248012022-08-30 Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines Aceves, Benjamin Gunn, Rose Pisciotta, Maura Razon, Na’amah Cottrell, Erika Hessler, Danielle Gold, Rachel Gottlieb, Laura M. Curr Diab Rep Psychosocial Aspects (J Pierce, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients’ social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these “social care” initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories. RECENT FINDINGS: We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. SUMMARY: Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D. Springer US 2022-08-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9424801/ /pubmed/36040537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Psychosocial Aspects (J Pierce, Section Editor) Aceves, Benjamin Gunn, Rose Pisciotta, Maura Razon, Na’amah Cottrell, Erika Hessler, Danielle Gold, Rachel Gottlieb, Laura M. Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines |
title | Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines |
title_full | Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines |
title_short | Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines |
title_sort | social care recommendations in national diabetes treatment guidelines |
topic | Psychosocial Aspects (J Pierce, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36040537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acevesbenjamin socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT gunnrose socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT pisciottamaura socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT razonnaamah socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT cottrellerika socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT hesslerdanielle socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT goldrachel socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines AT gottlieblauram socialcarerecommendationsinnationaldiabetestreatmentguidelines |