Cargando…

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neonatal sepsis (NS) continues to be a critical healthcare priority for the coming decades worldwide. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for neonatal sepsis and to summarize and compare their recommenda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amer, Yasser S., Shaiba, Lana A., Hadid, Adnan, Anabrees, Jasim, Almehery, Abdulrahman, AAssiri, Manal, Alnemri, Abdulrahman, Darwish, Amira R. Al, Baqawi, Badi, Aboshaiqah, Ahmad, Hneiny, Layal, Almaghrabi, Rana H., El-Malky, Ahmed M., Al-Dajani, Nawaf M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.891572
_version_ 1784778314921017344
author Amer, Yasser S.
Shaiba, Lana A.
Hadid, Adnan
Anabrees, Jasim
Almehery, Abdulrahman
AAssiri, Manal
Alnemri, Abdulrahman
Darwish, Amira R. Al
Baqawi, Badi
Aboshaiqah, Ahmad
Hneiny, Layal
Almaghrabi, Rana H.
El-Malky, Ahmed M.
Al-Dajani, Nawaf M.
author_facet Amer, Yasser S.
Shaiba, Lana A.
Hadid, Adnan
Anabrees, Jasim
Almehery, Abdulrahman
AAssiri, Manal
Alnemri, Abdulrahman
Darwish, Amira R. Al
Baqawi, Badi
Aboshaiqah, Ahmad
Hneiny, Layal
Almaghrabi, Rana H.
El-Malky, Ahmed M.
Al-Dajani, Nawaf M.
author_sort Amer, Yasser S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neonatal sepsis (NS) continues to be a critical healthcare priority for the coming decades worldwide. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for neonatal sepsis and to summarize and compare their recommendations. METHODS: This study involves a systematic review of CPGs. We identified clinical questions and eligibility criteria and searched and screened for CPGs using bibliographic and CPG databases and professional societies. Each included CPG was assessed by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. We summarized the recommendations in a comparison practical table. The systematic review was drafted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Its protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42021258732). RESULTS: Our search retrieved 4,432 citations; of which five CPGs were eligible and appraised: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP 2018) (35 and 34 weeks); Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS 2017); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2021); and Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Services (QH 2020). Among these, the overall assessment of two evidence-based CPGs scored > 70% (NICE and QH), which was consistent with their higher scores in the six domains of the AGREE II instrument. In domain 3 (rigor of development), NICE and QH scored 99 and 60%, respectively. In domain 5 (applicability), they scored 96 and 74%, respectively, and in domain 6 (editorial independence), they scored 90 and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The methodological quality of the NICE CPG was superior followed by the QH CPG with relevant recommendations for use in practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021258732, PROSPERO (CRD42021258732).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9424847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94248472022-08-31 Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines Amer, Yasser S. Shaiba, Lana A. Hadid, Adnan Anabrees, Jasim Almehery, Abdulrahman AAssiri, Manal Alnemri, Abdulrahman Darwish, Amira R. Al Baqawi, Badi Aboshaiqah, Ahmad Hneiny, Layal Almaghrabi, Rana H. El-Malky, Ahmed M. Al-Dajani, Nawaf M. Front Pediatr Pediatrics BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neonatal sepsis (NS) continues to be a critical healthcare priority for the coming decades worldwide. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the quality of recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for neonatal sepsis and to summarize and compare their recommendations. METHODS: This study involves a systematic review of CPGs. We identified clinical questions and eligibility criteria and searched and screened for CPGs using bibliographic and CPG databases and professional societies. Each included CPG was assessed by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. We summarized the recommendations in a comparison practical table. The systematic review was drafted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Its protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42021258732). RESULTS: Our search retrieved 4,432 citations; of which five CPGs were eligible and appraised: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP 2018) (35 and 34 weeks); Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS 2017); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2021); and Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Services (QH 2020). Among these, the overall assessment of two evidence-based CPGs scored > 70% (NICE and QH), which was consistent with their higher scores in the six domains of the AGREE II instrument. In domain 3 (rigor of development), NICE and QH scored 99 and 60%, respectively. In domain 5 (applicability), they scored 96 and 74%, respectively, and in domain 6 (editorial independence), they scored 90 and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The methodological quality of the NICE CPG was superior followed by the QH CPG with relevant recommendations for use in practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021258732, PROSPERO (CRD42021258732). Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9424847/ /pubmed/36052365 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.891572 Text en Copyright © 2022 Amer, Shaiba, Hadid, Anabrees, Almehery, AAssiri, Alnemri, Darwish, Baqawi, Aboshaiqah, Hneiny, Almaghrabi, El-Malky and Al-Dajani. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Amer, Yasser S.
Shaiba, Lana A.
Hadid, Adnan
Anabrees, Jasim
Almehery, Abdulrahman
AAssiri, Manal
Alnemri, Abdulrahman
Darwish, Amira R. Al
Baqawi, Badi
Aboshaiqah, Ahmad
Hneiny, Layal
Almaghrabi, Rana H.
El-Malky, Ahmed M.
Al-Dajani, Nawaf M.
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines
title Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines
title_full Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines
title_fullStr Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines
title_short Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument: A systematic review of neonatal guidelines
title_sort quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal sepsis using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (agree) ii instrument: a systematic review of neonatal guidelines
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.891572
work_keys_str_mv AT ameryassers qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT shaibalanaa qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT hadidadnan qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT anabreesjasim qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT almeheryabdulrahman qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT aassirimanal qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT alnemriabdulrahman qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT darwishamiraral qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT baqawibadi qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT aboshaiqahahmad qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT hneinylayal qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT almaghrabiranah qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT elmalkyahmedm qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines
AT aldajaninawafm qualityassessmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalsepsisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesforresearchandevaluationagreeiiinstrumentasystematicreviewofneonatalguidelines