Cargando…

Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale

Assessment of critical consciousness among individuals can provide a proxy measure of the readiness of communities, and individual decision-makers within, for social changes that address root causes of ill health. Critical consciousness, as conceived by Paolo Freire, emerges as a consequence of prax...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orsini, Muhsin Michael, Ewald, D. Rose, Strack, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101202
_version_ 1784778364616179712
author Orsini, Muhsin Michael
Ewald, D. Rose
Strack, Robert W.
author_facet Orsini, Muhsin Michael
Ewald, D. Rose
Strack, Robert W.
author_sort Orsini, Muhsin Michael
collection PubMed
description Assessment of critical consciousness among individuals can provide a proxy measure of the readiness of communities, and individual decision-makers within, for social changes that address root causes of ill health. Critical consciousness, as conceived by Paolo Freire, emerges as a consequence of praxis. This iterative, recursive process of reflection and co-created knowledge enables community members to identify salient issues and the actions they want to take to address those issues. Public health and other social science researchers who engage in social- and population-level intervention work need a validated instrument that measures critical consciousness. Our purpose was to develop an instrument that can measure 4 key constructs of critical consciousness (passive adaptation, emotional engagement, cognitive awakening, and intentions to act) in an individual, relative to any salient community issue. We conducted two studies (Initial: June 2018; Retest: October 2019) to develop and validate this instrument. The same sampling strategy was used for both studies, but each study was conducted with a discrete cohort of participants. We used Amazon's Mechanical Turk to recruit and incentivize study participants. Data from the Initial study were used in an iterative process to evaluate construct validity and test our theoretical assumptions. Exploratory factor analyses were used to determine the best model fit that gave the greatest subscale reliability and validity. In the Retest study, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted and construct validity was verified. Our results indicated adequate construct validity as evidenced by good model fit. Additionally, the good fit of the data to the 4-factor structure confirmed our theoretical understanding of critical consciousness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94250602022-08-31 Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale Orsini, Muhsin Michael Ewald, D. Rose Strack, Robert W. SSM Popul Health Review Article Assessment of critical consciousness among individuals can provide a proxy measure of the readiness of communities, and individual decision-makers within, for social changes that address root causes of ill health. Critical consciousness, as conceived by Paolo Freire, emerges as a consequence of praxis. This iterative, recursive process of reflection and co-created knowledge enables community members to identify salient issues and the actions they want to take to address those issues. Public health and other social science researchers who engage in social- and population-level intervention work need a validated instrument that measures critical consciousness. Our purpose was to develop an instrument that can measure 4 key constructs of critical consciousness (passive adaptation, emotional engagement, cognitive awakening, and intentions to act) in an individual, relative to any salient community issue. We conducted two studies (Initial: June 2018; Retest: October 2019) to develop and validate this instrument. The same sampling strategy was used for both studies, but each study was conducted with a discrete cohort of participants. We used Amazon's Mechanical Turk to recruit and incentivize study participants. Data from the Initial study were used in an iterative process to evaluate construct validity and test our theoretical assumptions. Exploratory factor analyses were used to determine the best model fit that gave the greatest subscale reliability and validity. In the Retest study, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted and construct validity was verified. Our results indicated adequate construct validity as evidenced by good model fit. Additionally, the good fit of the data to the 4-factor structure confirmed our theoretical understanding of critical consciousness. Elsevier 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9425060/ /pubmed/36052157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101202 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Orsini, Muhsin Michael
Ewald, D. Rose
Strack, Robert W.
Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale
title Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale
title_full Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale
title_fullStr Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale
title_short Development and validation of the 4-Factor Critical Consciousness Scale
title_sort development and validation of the 4-factor critical consciousness scale
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101202
work_keys_str_mv AT orsinimuhsinmichael developmentandvalidationofthe4factorcriticalconsciousnessscale
AT ewalddrose developmentandvalidationofthe4factorcriticalconsciousnessscale
AT strackrobertw developmentandvalidationofthe4factorcriticalconsciousnessscale