Cargando…

Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm

OBJECTIVE: Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) is increasingly being applied in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. However, the impact of proportion of internal data in the training set on test results has not been sufficiently studied. Here, we constructed an artificial intelligence (AI) system called...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Tao, Jiang, Yancai, Mao, Boneng, Wang, Xing, Lu, Bo, Qian, Ji, Zhou, Hutao, Ma, Tieliang, Zhang, Yefei, Li, Sisi, Shi, Yun, Yao, Zhendong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.953090
_version_ 1784778372258201600
author Jin, Tao
Jiang, Yancai
Mao, Boneng
Wang, Xing
Lu, Bo
Qian, Ji
Zhou, Hutao
Ma, Tieliang
Zhang, Yefei
Li, Sisi
Shi, Yun
Yao, Zhendong
author_facet Jin, Tao
Jiang, Yancai
Mao, Boneng
Wang, Xing
Lu, Bo
Qian, Ji
Zhou, Hutao
Ma, Tieliang
Zhang, Yefei
Li, Sisi
Shi, Yun
Yao, Zhendong
author_sort Jin, Tao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) is increasingly being applied in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. However, the impact of proportion of internal data in the training set on test results has not been sufficiently studied. Here, we constructed an artificial intelligence (AI) system called EGC-YOLOV4 using the YOLO-v4 algorithm to explore the optimal ratio of training set with the power to diagnose early gastric cancer. DESIGN: A total of 22,0918 gastroscopic images from Yixing People’s Hospital were collected. 7 training set models were established to identify 4 test sets. Respective sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, accuracy, and corresponding thresholds were tested, and ROC curves were plotted. RESULTS: 1. The EGC-YOLOV4 system completes all tests at an average reading speed of about 15 ms/sheet; 2. The AUC values in training set 1 model were 0.8325, 0.8307, 0.8706, and 0.8279, in training set 2 model were 0.8674, 0.8635, 0.9056, and 0.9249, in training set 3 model were 0.8544, 0.8881, 0.9072, and 0.9237, in training set 4 model were 0.8271, 0.9020, 0.9102, and 0.9316, in training set 5 model were 0.8249, 0.8484, 0.8796, and 0.8931, in training set 6 model were 0.8235, 0.8539, 0.9002, and 0.9051, in training set 7 model were 0.7581, 0.8082, 0.8803, and 0.8763. CONCLUSION: EGC-YOLOV4 can quickly and accurately identify the early gastric cancer lesions in gastroscopic images, and has good generalization.The proportion of positive and negative samples in the training set will affect the overall diagnostic performance of AI.In this study, the optimal ratio of positive samples to negative samples in the training set is 1:1~ 1:2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94250912022-08-31 Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm Jin, Tao Jiang, Yancai Mao, Boneng Wang, Xing Lu, Bo Qian, Ji Zhou, Hutao Ma, Tieliang Zhang, Yefei Li, Sisi Shi, Yun Yao, Zhendong Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) is increasingly being applied in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. However, the impact of proportion of internal data in the training set on test results has not been sufficiently studied. Here, we constructed an artificial intelligence (AI) system called EGC-YOLOV4 using the YOLO-v4 algorithm to explore the optimal ratio of training set with the power to diagnose early gastric cancer. DESIGN: A total of 22,0918 gastroscopic images from Yixing People’s Hospital were collected. 7 training set models were established to identify 4 test sets. Respective sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, accuracy, and corresponding thresholds were tested, and ROC curves were plotted. RESULTS: 1. The EGC-YOLOV4 system completes all tests at an average reading speed of about 15 ms/sheet; 2. The AUC values in training set 1 model were 0.8325, 0.8307, 0.8706, and 0.8279, in training set 2 model were 0.8674, 0.8635, 0.9056, and 0.9249, in training set 3 model were 0.8544, 0.8881, 0.9072, and 0.9237, in training set 4 model were 0.8271, 0.9020, 0.9102, and 0.9316, in training set 5 model were 0.8249, 0.8484, 0.8796, and 0.8931, in training set 6 model were 0.8235, 0.8539, 0.9002, and 0.9051, in training set 7 model were 0.7581, 0.8082, 0.8803, and 0.8763. CONCLUSION: EGC-YOLOV4 can quickly and accurately identify the early gastric cancer lesions in gastroscopic images, and has good generalization.The proportion of positive and negative samples in the training set will affect the overall diagnostic performance of AI.In this study, the optimal ratio of positive samples to negative samples in the training set is 1:1~ 1:2. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9425091/ /pubmed/36052264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.953090 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jin, Jiang, Mao, Wang, Lu, Qian, Zhou, Ma, Zhang, Li, Shi and Yao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Jin, Tao
Jiang, Yancai
Mao, Boneng
Wang, Xing
Lu, Bo
Qian, Ji
Zhou, Hutao
Ma, Tieliang
Zhang, Yefei
Li, Sisi
Shi, Yun
Yao, Zhendong
Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm
title Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm
title_full Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm
title_fullStr Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm
title_short Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm
title_sort multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an ai system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the yolo-v4 algorithm
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.953090
work_keys_str_mv AT jintao multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT jiangyancai multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT maoboneng multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT wangxing multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT lubo multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT qianji multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT zhouhutao multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT matieliang multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT zhangyefei multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT lisisi multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT shiyun multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm
AT yaozhendong multicenterverificationoftheinfluenceofdataratiooftrainingsetsontestresultsofanaisystemfordetectingearlygastriccancerbasedontheyolov4algorithm