Cargando…
The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a well-established tool that has been widely employed to assess patients' frailty status and to predict clinical outcomes in the acute phase of a disease, but more information is needed to define the implications that this tool have when dealing w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.967952 |
_version_ | 1784778374512640000 |
---|---|
author | Granata, Nicolò Vigoré, Martina Steccanella, Andrea Ranucci, Luca Sarzi Braga, Simona Baiardi, Paola Pierobon, Antonia |
author_facet | Granata, Nicolò Vigoré, Martina Steccanella, Andrea Ranucci, Luca Sarzi Braga, Simona Baiardi, Paola Pierobon, Antonia |
author_sort | Granata, Nicolò |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a well-established tool that has been widely employed to assess patients' frailty status and to predict clinical outcomes in the acute phase of a disease, but more information is needed to define the implications that this tool have when dealing with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases to identify studies employing the CFS to assess frailty in patients with NCDs. FINDINGS: After database searching, article suitability evaluation, and studies' quality assessment, 43 studies were included in the systematic review. Researches were conducted mostly in Japan (37.5%), and half of the studies were focused on cardiovascular diseases (46.42%), followed by cancer (25.00%), and diabetes (10.71%). Simplicity (39.29%), efficacy (37.5%), and rapidity (16.07%) were the CFS characteristics mostly appreciated by the authors of the studies. The CFS-related results indicated that its scores were associated with patients' clinical outcomes (33.92%), with the presence of the disease (12.5%) and, with clinical decision making (10.71%). Furthermore, CFS resulted as a predictor of life expectancy in 23 studies (41.07%), clinical outcomes in 12 studies (21.43%), and hospital admissions/readmissions in 6 studies (10.71%). DISCUSSION: CFS was found to be a well-established and useful tool to assess frailty in NCDs, too. It resulted to be related to the most important disease-related clinical characteristics and, thus, it should be always considered as an important step in the multidisciplinary evaluation of frail and chronic patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp? PROSPERO 2021, ID: CRD42021224214. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9425100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94251002022-08-31 The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review Granata, Nicolò Vigoré, Martina Steccanella, Andrea Ranucci, Luca Sarzi Braga, Simona Baiardi, Paola Pierobon, Antonia Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a well-established tool that has been widely employed to assess patients' frailty status and to predict clinical outcomes in the acute phase of a disease, but more information is needed to define the implications that this tool have when dealing with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases to identify studies employing the CFS to assess frailty in patients with NCDs. FINDINGS: After database searching, article suitability evaluation, and studies' quality assessment, 43 studies were included in the systematic review. Researches were conducted mostly in Japan (37.5%), and half of the studies were focused on cardiovascular diseases (46.42%), followed by cancer (25.00%), and diabetes (10.71%). Simplicity (39.29%), efficacy (37.5%), and rapidity (16.07%) were the CFS characteristics mostly appreciated by the authors of the studies. The CFS-related results indicated that its scores were associated with patients' clinical outcomes (33.92%), with the presence of the disease (12.5%) and, with clinical decision making (10.71%). Furthermore, CFS resulted as a predictor of life expectancy in 23 studies (41.07%), clinical outcomes in 12 studies (21.43%), and hospital admissions/readmissions in 6 studies (10.71%). DISCUSSION: CFS was found to be a well-established and useful tool to assess frailty in NCDs, too. It resulted to be related to the most important disease-related clinical characteristics and, thus, it should be always considered as an important step in the multidisciplinary evaluation of frail and chronic patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp? PROSPERO 2021, ID: CRD42021224214. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9425100/ /pubmed/36052327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.967952 Text en Copyright © 2022 Granata, Vigoré, Steccanella, Ranucci, Sarzi Braga, Baiardi and Pierobon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Granata, Nicolò Vigoré, Martina Steccanella, Andrea Ranucci, Luca Sarzi Braga, Simona Baiardi, Paola Pierobon, Antonia The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review |
title | The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review |
title_full | The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review |
title_short | The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review |
title_sort | clinical frailty scale (cfs) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from non-communicable diseases (ncds): a systematic review |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.967952 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granatanicolo theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT vigoremartina theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT steccanellaandrea theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT ranucciluca theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT sarzibragasimona theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT baiardipaola theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT pierobonantonia theclinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT granatanicolo clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT vigoremartina clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT steccanellaandrea clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT ranucciluca clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT sarzibragasimona clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT baiardipaola clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview AT pierobonantonia clinicalfrailtyscalecfsemploymentinthefrailtyassessmentofpatientssufferingfromnoncommunicablediseasesncdsasystematicreview |