Cargando…
Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study
In Brazil the knowledge about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients is scarce. This study aimed to determine the incidence of respiratory tract colonization and the identification rates after a standardized treatment. A retrospective cohort was performed h...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27755979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.09.003 |
_version_ | 1784778466538815488 |
---|---|
author | Bittencourt, Paloma Horejs Pimentel, Carlos Sidney Silva Bonfim, Bianca Sampaio Marostica, Paulo José Souza, Edna Lúcia |
author_facet | Bittencourt, Paloma Horejs Pimentel, Carlos Sidney Silva Bonfim, Bianca Sampaio Marostica, Paulo José Souza, Edna Lúcia |
author_sort | Bittencourt, Paloma Horejs |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Brazil the knowledge about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients is scarce. This study aimed to determine the incidence of respiratory tract colonization and the identification rates after a standardized treatment. A retrospective cohort was performed highlighting the history of respiratory colonizations between January 2008 and June 2015. Patients under the age of 21 years with cystic fibrosis confirmed by sweat test or genetic study receiving care at the outpatient clinics of a Teaching Hospital were included. The treatment consisted of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine 2%. The mean follow-up period was of 22.2 months and those with ≥3 negative cultures were considered free of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Forty-two patients were included. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified in six patients. Most patients had methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolation prior to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Five children used the standardized treatment, none presented side effects. Only one child had a new isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during follow-up (after 20 months). The incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection was high and occurred in young patients. The therapeutic regimen was effective, safe and being a good option to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9425515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94255152022-08-31 Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study Bittencourt, Paloma Horejs Pimentel, Carlos Sidney Silva Bonfim, Bianca Sampaio Marostica, Paulo José Souza, Edna Lúcia Braz J Infect Dis Brief Communication In Brazil the knowledge about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients is scarce. This study aimed to determine the incidence of respiratory tract colonization and the identification rates after a standardized treatment. A retrospective cohort was performed highlighting the history of respiratory colonizations between January 2008 and June 2015. Patients under the age of 21 years with cystic fibrosis confirmed by sweat test or genetic study receiving care at the outpatient clinics of a Teaching Hospital were included. The treatment consisted of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine 2%. The mean follow-up period was of 22.2 months and those with ≥3 negative cultures were considered free of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Forty-two patients were included. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified in six patients. Most patients had methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolation prior to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Five children used the standardized treatment, none presented side effects. Only one child had a new isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during follow-up (after 20 months). The incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection was high and occurred in young patients. The therapeutic regimen was effective, safe and being a good option to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Elsevier 2016-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9425515/ /pubmed/27755979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.09.003 Text en © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Bittencourt, Paloma Horejs Pimentel, Carlos Sidney Silva Bonfim, Bianca Sampaio Marostica, Paulo José Souza, Edna Lúcia Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
title | Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
title_full | Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
title_short | Incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
title_sort | incidence and treatment of methicillin-resistant s. aureus infection in cystic fibrosis patients: a cohort study |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27755979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.09.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bittencourtpalomahorejs incidenceandtreatmentofmethicillinresistantsaureusinfectionincysticfibrosispatientsacohortstudy AT pimentelcarlossidneysilva incidenceandtreatmentofmethicillinresistantsaureusinfectionincysticfibrosispatientsacohortstudy AT bonfimbiancasampaio incidenceandtreatmentofmethicillinresistantsaureusinfectionincysticfibrosispatientsacohortstudy AT marosticapaulojose incidenceandtreatmentofmethicillinresistantsaureusinfectionincysticfibrosispatientsacohortstudy AT souzaednalucia incidenceandtreatmentofmethicillinresistantsaureusinfectionincysticfibrosispatientsacohortstudy |