Cargando…

Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study

Drug survival reflects the real-life efficacy and safety of therapeutic agents. Evidence regarding the durability of adjuvant agents in the treatment of pemphigus is sparse. The aims of this study were to investigate the survival of adjuvant agents used to manage patients with pemphigus, and to iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KRIDIN, Khalaf, HAMMERS, Christoph M., LUDWIG, Ralf J., TZUR BITAN, Dana, COHEN, Arnon D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3831
_version_ 1784778487929765888
author KRIDIN, Khalaf
HAMMERS, Christoph M.
LUDWIG, Ralf J.
TZUR BITAN, Dana
COHEN, Arnon D.
author_facet KRIDIN, Khalaf
HAMMERS, Christoph M.
LUDWIG, Ralf J.
TZUR BITAN, Dana
COHEN, Arnon D.
author_sort KRIDIN, Khalaf
collection PubMed
description Drug survival reflects the real-life efficacy and safety of therapeutic agents. Evidence regarding the durability of adjuvant agents in the treatment of pemphigus is sparse. The aims of this study were to investigate the survival of adjuvant agents used to manage patients with pemphigus, and to identify predictors of treatment dropout. A retrospective population-based cohort study was designed to follow patients with pemphigus managed by adjuvant agents. The study population included 436 patients with pemphigus managed by 608 adjuvant agent courses. The highest median drug survival time was observed for rituximab (43.6 months, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.3–81.9), followed by cyclophosphamide (30.5 months; 95% CI 10.5–50.5), azathioprine (22.9 months; 95% CI 15.6–30.2), and mycophenolate mofetil (20.2 months; 95% CI 10.0–30.4). Compared with azathioprine, cyclosporine (adjusted hazard ratio 2.98; 95% CI 1.57–5.62; p = 0.005) and dapsone (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.07–3.15; p = 0.027) were associated with a significantly increased risk of drug discontinuation. To conclude, rituximab, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil demonstrated better durability, whilst dapsone and cyclosporine were associated with low drug survival and high dropout.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94256222022-10-20 Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study KRIDIN, Khalaf HAMMERS, Christoph M. LUDWIG, Ralf J. TZUR BITAN, Dana COHEN, Arnon D. Acta Derm Venereol Clinical Report Drug survival reflects the real-life efficacy and safety of therapeutic agents. Evidence regarding the durability of adjuvant agents in the treatment of pemphigus is sparse. The aims of this study were to investigate the survival of adjuvant agents used to manage patients with pemphigus, and to identify predictors of treatment dropout. A retrospective population-based cohort study was designed to follow patients with pemphigus managed by adjuvant agents. The study population included 436 patients with pemphigus managed by 608 adjuvant agent courses. The highest median drug survival time was observed for rituximab (43.6 months, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.3–81.9), followed by cyclophosphamide (30.5 months; 95% CI 10.5–50.5), azathioprine (22.9 months; 95% CI 15.6–30.2), and mycophenolate mofetil (20.2 months; 95% CI 10.0–30.4). Compared with azathioprine, cyclosporine (adjusted hazard ratio 2.98; 95% CI 1.57–5.62; p = 0.005) and dapsone (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83; 95% CI 1.07–3.15; p = 0.027) were associated with a significantly increased risk of drug discontinuation. To conclude, rituximab, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil demonstrated better durability, whilst dapsone and cyclosporine were associated with low drug survival and high dropout. Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9425622/ /pubmed/34003297 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3831 Text en © 2021 Acta Dermato-Venereologica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license
spellingShingle Clinical Report
KRIDIN, Khalaf
HAMMERS, Christoph M.
LUDWIG, Ralf J.
TZUR BITAN, Dana
COHEN, Arnon D.
Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study
title Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study
title_full Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study
title_fullStr Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study
title_short Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study
title_sort survival of adjuvant drugs for treatment of pemphigus: a population-based cohort study
topic Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34003297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3831
work_keys_str_mv AT kridinkhalaf survivalofadjuvantdrugsfortreatmentofpemphigusapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT hammerschristophm survivalofadjuvantdrugsfortreatmentofpemphigusapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT ludwigralfj survivalofadjuvantdrugsfortreatmentofpemphigusapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT tzurbitandana survivalofadjuvantdrugsfortreatmentofpemphigusapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT cohenarnond survivalofadjuvantdrugsfortreatmentofpemphigusapopulationbasedcohortstudy