Cargando…
Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women
Group B Streptococcus is a causative agent of invasive neonatal infections. Maternal colonization by Streptococcus agalactiae is a necessary condition for vertical transmission, with efficient screening of pregnant women playing an essential role in the prevention of neonatal infections. In this stu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30471244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2018.09.005 |
_version_ | 1784778494855610368 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Michele Berger de-Paris, Fernanda Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Nunes, Luciana de Souza |
author_facet | Ferreira, Michele Berger de-Paris, Fernanda Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Nunes, Luciana de Souza |
author_sort | Ferreira, Michele Berger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Group B Streptococcus is a causative agent of invasive neonatal infections. Maternal colonization by Streptococcus agalactiae is a necessary condition for vertical transmission, with efficient screening of pregnant women playing an essential role in the prevention of neonatal infections. In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of conventional polymerase chain reaction and real-time PCR assays as screening methods for S. agalactiae in pregnant women against the microbiological culture method considered as the gold-standard. A total of 130 samples from pregnant women were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software, version 20.0. The verified colonization rate was 3.8% with the gold-standard, 17.7% with conventional PCR assay, and 29.2% with the real-time PCR test. The trials with conventional PCR and real-time PCR had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85.6% and 73.6%, respectively. The real-time PCR assay had a better performance compared to the gold-standard and a greater detection rate of colonization by S. agalactiae compared to conventional PCR assay. With its quick results, it would be suitable for using in routine screenings, contributing to the optimization of preventive approaches to neonatal S. agalactiae infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9425650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94256502022-08-31 Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women Ferreira, Michele Berger de-Paris, Fernanda Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Nunes, Luciana de Souza Braz J Infect Dis Original Article Group B Streptococcus is a causative agent of invasive neonatal infections. Maternal colonization by Streptococcus agalactiae is a necessary condition for vertical transmission, with efficient screening of pregnant women playing an essential role in the prevention of neonatal infections. In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of conventional polymerase chain reaction and real-time PCR assays as screening methods for S. agalactiae in pregnant women against the microbiological culture method considered as the gold-standard. A total of 130 samples from pregnant women were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software, version 20.0. The verified colonization rate was 3.8% with the gold-standard, 17.7% with conventional PCR assay, and 29.2% with the real-time PCR test. The trials with conventional PCR and real-time PCR had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85.6% and 73.6%, respectively. The real-time PCR assay had a better performance compared to the gold-standard and a greater detection rate of colonization by S. agalactiae compared to conventional PCR assay. With its quick results, it would be suitable for using in routine screenings, contributing to the optimization of preventive approaches to neonatal S. agalactiae infection. Elsevier 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9425650/ /pubmed/30471244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2018.09.005 Text en Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ferreira, Michele Berger de-Paris, Fernanda Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto Nunes, Luciana de Souza Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
title | Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
title_full | Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
title_fullStr | Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
title_short | Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
title_sort | assessment of conventional pcr and real-time pcr compared to the gold standard method for screening streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30471244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2018.09.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiramicheleberger assessmentofconventionalpcrandrealtimepcrcomparedtothegoldstandardmethodforscreeningstreptococcusagalactiaeinpregnantwomen AT deparisfernanda assessmentofconventionalpcrandrealtimepcrcomparedtothegoldstandardmethodforscreeningstreptococcusagalactiaeinpregnantwomen AT paivarodrigominuto assessmentofconventionalpcrandrealtimepcrcomparedtothegoldstandardmethodforscreeningstreptococcusagalactiaeinpregnantwomen AT nuneslucianadesouza assessmentofconventionalpcrandrealtimepcrcomparedtothegoldstandardmethodforscreeningstreptococcusagalactiaeinpregnantwomen |