Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been a new surgical navigation technique for gastric cancer. However, its clinical value should still be evaluated further. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Chun, Zhang, Zhenyu, Qi, Hengduo, Guo, Zhi, Liu, Yang, Xiao, Haimin, Li, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.917541
_version_ 1784778524423356416
author Deng, Chun
Zhang, Zhenyu
Qi, Hengduo
Guo, Zhi
Liu, Yang
Xiao, Haimin
Li, Xiaojun
author_facet Deng, Chun
Zhang, Zhenyu
Qi, Hengduo
Guo, Zhi
Liu, Yang
Xiao, Haimin
Li, Xiaojun
author_sort Deng, Chun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been a new surgical navigation technique for gastric cancer. However, its clinical value should still be evaluated further. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes (LNs) dissection during radical gastrectomy. METHODS: Studies comparing ICG fluorescence imaging with standard care in patients with gastric cancer were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through August 2021. The current meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines. A pooled analysis was performed for the available data regarding the number of LNs dissection, the number of metastatic LNs dissection, other operative outcomes, and postoperative complications. R software version 4.2.0 and Stata 16.0 software were used for the present meta-analysis. RESULTS: This analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1365 gastric cancer patients (569 in the ICG group and 796 in the non-ICG group). The number of retrieved LNs in the ICG group was significantly higher (weighted mean difference [WMD]=7.67, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.73 to 10.62, P<0.05) compared to the non-ICG group with moderate heterogeneity (P<0.001, I(2 =) 70%). The number of metastatic LNs, operative time, and postoperative complications were all comparable and without significant heterogeneity. Additionally, ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-10.28, 95% CI: -15.22 to -5.35, P<0.05) with low heterogeneity (P=0.07, I2 = 43%). CONCLUSIONS: ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymphadenectomy was considered to be safe and effective in gastrectomy. ICG was used to increase the number of LNs harvested while reducing intraoperative blood loss without increasing operative time or postoperative complications. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021291863.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94257732022-08-31 Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Deng, Chun Zhang, Zhenyu Qi, Hengduo Guo, Zhi Liu, Yang Xiao, Haimin Li, Xiaojun Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been a new surgical navigation technique for gastric cancer. However, its clinical value should still be evaluated further. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the safety and efficacy of ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes (LNs) dissection during radical gastrectomy. METHODS: Studies comparing ICG fluorescence imaging with standard care in patients with gastric cancer were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through August 2021. The current meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines. A pooled analysis was performed for the available data regarding the number of LNs dissection, the number of metastatic LNs dissection, other operative outcomes, and postoperative complications. R software version 4.2.0 and Stata 16.0 software were used for the present meta-analysis. RESULTS: This analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1365 gastric cancer patients (569 in the ICG group and 796 in the non-ICG group). The number of retrieved LNs in the ICG group was significantly higher (weighted mean difference [WMD]=7.67, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.73 to 10.62, P<0.05) compared to the non-ICG group with moderate heterogeneity (P<0.001, I(2 =) 70%). The number of metastatic LNs, operative time, and postoperative complications were all comparable and without significant heterogeneity. Additionally, ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-10.28, 95% CI: -15.22 to -5.35, P<0.05) with low heterogeneity (P=0.07, I2 = 43%). CONCLUSIONS: ICG near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymphadenectomy was considered to be safe and effective in gastrectomy. ICG was used to increase the number of LNs harvested while reducing intraoperative blood loss without increasing operative time or postoperative complications. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021291863. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9425773/ /pubmed/36052237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.917541 Text en Copyright © 2022 Deng, Zhang, Qi, Guo, Liu, Xiao and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Deng, Chun
Zhang, Zhenyu
Qi, Hengduo
Guo, Zhi
Liu, Yang
Xiao, Haimin
Li, Xiaojun
Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety and efficacy of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescent imaging-guided lymph nodes dissection during radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.917541
work_keys_str_mv AT dengchun safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhenyu safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qihengduo safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guozhi safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyang safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaohaimin safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiaojun safetyandefficacyofindocyaninegreennearinfraredfluorescentimagingguidedlymphnodesdissectionduringradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis