Cargando…

A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial

BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is a complex condition with a considerable healthcare burden. The average hospital stay for pleural infection is 14 days. Current standard of care defaults to chest tube insertion and intravenous antibiotics. There have been no randomised trials on the use of therapeuti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnold, David T., Tucker, Emma, Morley, Anna, Milne, Alice, Stadon, Louise, Patole, Sonia, Nava, George W., Walker, Steven P., Maskell, Nick A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02126-4
_version_ 1784778542396997632
author Arnold, David T.
Tucker, Emma
Morley, Anna
Milne, Alice
Stadon, Louise
Patole, Sonia
Nava, George W.
Walker, Steven P.
Maskell, Nick A.
author_facet Arnold, David T.
Tucker, Emma
Morley, Anna
Milne, Alice
Stadon, Louise
Patole, Sonia
Nava, George W.
Walker, Steven P.
Maskell, Nick A.
author_sort Arnold, David T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is a complex condition with a considerable healthcare burden. The average hospital stay for pleural infection is 14 days. Current standard of care defaults to chest tube insertion and intravenous antibiotics. There have been no randomised trials on the use of therapeutic thoracentesis (TT) for pleural fluid drainage in pleural infection. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of a full-scale trial of chest tube vs TT for pleural infection in a single UK centre. The primary outcome was defined as the acceptability of randomisation to patients. METHODS: Adult patients admitted with a pleural effusion felt to be related to infection and meeting criteria for drainage (based on international guidelines) were eligible for randomisation. Participants were randomised (1:1) to chest tube insertion or TT with daily review assessing need for further drainages or other therapies. Neither participant nor clinician were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up at 90 days post-randomisation. RESULTS: From September 2019 to June 2021, 51 patients were diagnosed with pleural infection (complex parapneumonic effusion/empyema). Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria for trial and 10 patients were randomised (91%). The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on recruitment. Data completeness was high in both groups with no protocol deviations. Patients randomised to TT had a significantly shorter overall mean hospital stay (5.4 days, SD 5.1) compared to the chest tube control group (13 days, SD 6.0), p = 0.04. Total number of pleural procedures required per patient were similar, 1.2 in chest tube group and 1.4 in TT group. No patient required a surgical referral. Adverse events were similar between the groups with no readmissions related to pleural infection. CONCLUSIONS: The ACTion trial met its pre-specified feasibility criteria for patient acceptability but other issues around feasibility of a full-scale trial remain. From the results available the hypothesis that TT can reduce length of stay in pleural infection should be explored further. Trial registration: ISRCTN: 84674413.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94258002022-08-30 A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial Arnold, David T. Tucker, Emma Morley, Anna Milne, Alice Stadon, Louise Patole, Sonia Nava, George W. Walker, Steven P. Maskell, Nick A. BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Pleural infection is a complex condition with a considerable healthcare burden. The average hospital stay for pleural infection is 14 days. Current standard of care defaults to chest tube insertion and intravenous antibiotics. There have been no randomised trials on the use of therapeutic thoracentesis (TT) for pleural fluid drainage in pleural infection. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of a full-scale trial of chest tube vs TT for pleural infection in a single UK centre. The primary outcome was defined as the acceptability of randomisation to patients. METHODS: Adult patients admitted with a pleural effusion felt to be related to infection and meeting criteria for drainage (based on international guidelines) were eligible for randomisation. Participants were randomised (1:1) to chest tube insertion or TT with daily review assessing need for further drainages or other therapies. Neither participant nor clinician were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up at 90 days post-randomisation. RESULTS: From September 2019 to June 2021, 51 patients were diagnosed with pleural infection (complex parapneumonic effusion/empyema). Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria for trial and 10 patients were randomised (91%). The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on recruitment. Data completeness was high in both groups with no protocol deviations. Patients randomised to TT had a significantly shorter overall mean hospital stay (5.4 days, SD 5.1) compared to the chest tube control group (13 days, SD 6.0), p = 0.04. Total number of pleural procedures required per patient were similar, 1.2 in chest tube group and 1.4 in TT group. No patient required a surgical referral. Adverse events were similar between the groups with no readmissions related to pleural infection. CONCLUSIONS: The ACTion trial met its pre-specified feasibility criteria for patient acceptability but other issues around feasibility of a full-scale trial remain. From the results available the hypothesis that TT can reduce length of stay in pleural infection should be explored further. Trial registration: ISRCTN: 84674413. BioMed Central 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9425800/ /pubmed/36042460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02126-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Arnold, David T.
Tucker, Emma
Morley, Anna
Milne, Alice
Stadon, Louise
Patole, Sonia
Nava, George W.
Walker, Steven P.
Maskell, Nick A.
A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial
title A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial
title_full A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial
title_fullStr A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial
title_short A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial
title_sort feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the action trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02126-4
work_keys_str_mv AT arnolddavidt afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT tuckeremma afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT morleyanna afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT milnealice afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT stadonlouise afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT patolesonia afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT navageorgew afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT walkerstevenp afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT maskellnicka afeasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT arnolddavidt feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT tuckeremma feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT morleyanna feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT milnealice feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT stadonlouise feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT patolesonia feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT navageorgew feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT walkerstevenp feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial
AT maskellnicka feasibilityrandomisedtrialcomparingtherapeuticthoracentesistochesttubeinsertionforthemanagementofpleuralinfectionresultsfromtheactiontrial