Cargando…

Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade

STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) are widely used in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and ACCF treating multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Tao, Guo, Junfei, Long, Yubin, Hou, Zhiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221124415
_version_ 1784778556337815552
author Wang, Tao
Guo, Junfei
Long, Yubin
Hou, Zhiyong
author_facet Wang, Tao
Guo, Junfei
Long, Yubin
Hou, Zhiyong
author_sort Wang, Tao
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) are widely used in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and ACCF treating multi-level CSM remain poorly understood. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of the two procedures in the treatment of 3-level and 4-level CSM. METHODS: An extensive search of the literature was performed in the English databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library and the Chinese databases of CNKI and WANFANG. We collected factors, including demographic data, surgical factors, and complications. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0. RESULTS: Finally, 14 articles (5429 patients) were included in our study. No significant difference was found in preoperative and 3-month follow-up Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index, preoperative C2-C7, segmental angle, operation time, as well as the number of dysphagia, hoarseness, cerebral fluid leakage, infection, epidural hematoma, axial pain, hardware breakage, and pseudarthrosis between ACDF and ACCF. However, our findings showed that blood loss (P < 0.00001), the number of total complications (P < 0 .00001), C5 palsy (P = 0.0004), graft dislodgement (P = 0.02), graft subsidence (P = 0.0003), and revision surgery (P = 0.0008) in ACDF were significantly less than in ACCF. Additionally, postoperative and change of C2-C7 (P < 0.00001), segment angle (P < 0.00001), and fusion rate (P = 0.001) in ACDF were significantly higher than in ACCF. Post-operative JOA in ACDF was significantly higher than in ACCF (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical efficacy of both surgeries was similar, ACDF was superior to ACCF in the reconstruction of cervical lordosis and the number of complications in the treatment of 3-level and 4-level CSM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94258822022-08-31 Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade Wang, Tao Guo, Junfei Long, Yubin Hou, Zhiyong Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Systematic Review STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) are widely used in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and ACCF treating multi-level CSM remain poorly understood. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of the two procedures in the treatment of 3-level and 4-level CSM. METHODS: An extensive search of the literature was performed in the English databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library and the Chinese databases of CNKI and WANFANG. We collected factors, including demographic data, surgical factors, and complications. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0. RESULTS: Finally, 14 articles (5429 patients) were included in our study. No significant difference was found in preoperative and 3-month follow-up Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index, preoperative C2-C7, segmental angle, operation time, as well as the number of dysphagia, hoarseness, cerebral fluid leakage, infection, epidural hematoma, axial pain, hardware breakage, and pseudarthrosis between ACDF and ACCF. However, our findings showed that blood loss (P < 0.00001), the number of total complications (P < 0 .00001), C5 palsy (P = 0.0004), graft dislodgement (P = 0.02), graft subsidence (P = 0.0003), and revision surgery (P = 0.0008) in ACDF were significantly less than in ACCF. Additionally, postoperative and change of C2-C7 (P < 0.00001), segment angle (P < 0.00001), and fusion rate (P = 0.001) in ACDF were significantly higher than in ACCF. Post-operative JOA in ACDF was significantly higher than in ACCF (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical efficacy of both surgeries was similar, ACDF was superior to ACCF in the reconstruction of cervical lordosis and the number of complications in the treatment of 3-level and 4-level CSM. SAGE Publications 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9425882/ /pubmed/36051508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221124415 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wang, Tao
Guo, Junfei
Long, Yubin
Hou, Zhiyong
Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade
title Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade
title_full Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade
title_short Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade
title_sort comparison of two anterior reconstructive techniques in the treatment of 3-level and 4 level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of last decade
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221124415
work_keys_str_mv AT wangtao comparisonoftwoanteriorreconstructivetechniquesinthetreatmentof3leveland4levelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyametaanalysisoflastdecade
AT guojunfei comparisonoftwoanteriorreconstructivetechniquesinthetreatmentof3leveland4levelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyametaanalysisoflastdecade
AT longyubin comparisonoftwoanteriorreconstructivetechniquesinthetreatmentof3leveland4levelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyametaanalysisoflastdecade
AT houzhiyong comparisonoftwoanteriorreconstructivetechniquesinthetreatmentof3leveland4levelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyametaanalysisoflastdecade