Cargando…
Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05769-w |
_version_ | 1784778572929433600 |
---|---|
author | Jun, Li Hao, Yu Junfeng, Zhan Jisen, Zhang Xinzhong, Xu Yunfeng, Yao Dasheng, Tian Jia, Xie |
author_facet | Jun, Li Hao, Yu Junfeng, Zhan Jisen, Zhang Xinzhong, Xu Yunfeng, Yao Dasheng, Tian Jia, Xie |
author_sort | Jun, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision (M-G/MISI) with the modified suture technique (MST). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 2012 and January 2020 at our hospital. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were statistically analyzed to compare the treatment efficacy of the two operative methods. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study, 34 of whom underwent M-G/MISI treatment, and 33 of whom underwent MST treatment. The intraoperative blood loss in the M-G/MISI group (16.47 ± 13.23 ml) was significantly lower than that in the MST group (34.55 ± 13.01 ml), and the difference was statistically significant (P ˂0.001). The incision in the M-G/MISI group (3.79 ± 1.81 cm) was significantly shorter than that in the MST group (5.79 ± 1.00 cm), and the difference was statistically significant (P˂0.001). The Achilles tendon rupture score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were higher than those of the MST group at the sixth month after the operation (P˂0.001). Postoperatively, there was 1 case of traumatic Achilles tendon rupture in the M-G/MISI group and 1 case each of infection and deep vein thrombosis in the modified suture group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the MST group, the M-G/MISI group had better Achilles tendon and ankle function scores at 6 months postoperatively, and less bleeding and shorter incisions. M-G/MISI is less invasive than MST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9425948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94259482022-08-31 Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures Jun, Li Hao, Yu Junfeng, Zhan Jisen, Zhang Xinzhong, Xu Yunfeng, Yao Dasheng, Tian Jia, Xie BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision (M-G/MISI) with the modified suture technique (MST). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 2012 and January 2020 at our hospital. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were statistically analyzed to compare the treatment efficacy of the two operative methods. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study, 34 of whom underwent M-G/MISI treatment, and 33 of whom underwent MST treatment. The intraoperative blood loss in the M-G/MISI group (16.47 ± 13.23 ml) was significantly lower than that in the MST group (34.55 ± 13.01 ml), and the difference was statistically significant (P ˂0.001). The incision in the M-G/MISI group (3.79 ± 1.81 cm) was significantly shorter than that in the MST group (5.79 ± 1.00 cm), and the difference was statistically significant (P˂0.001). The Achilles tendon rupture score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were higher than those of the MST group at the sixth month after the operation (P˂0.001). Postoperatively, there was 1 case of traumatic Achilles tendon rupture in the M-G/MISI group and 1 case each of infection and deep vein thrombosis in the modified suture group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the MST group, the M-G/MISI group had better Achilles tendon and ankle function scores at 6 months postoperatively, and less bleeding and shorter incisions. M-G/MISI is less invasive than MST. BioMed Central 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9425948/ /pubmed/36042433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05769-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jun, Li Hao, Yu Junfeng, Zhan Jisen, Zhang Xinzhong, Xu Yunfeng, Yao Dasheng, Tian Jia, Xie Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
title | Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
title_full | Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
title_short | Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
title_sort | comparison of ma-griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05769-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junli comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT haoyu comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT junfengzhan comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT jisenzhang comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT xinzhongxu comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT yunfengyao comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT dashengtian comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures AT jiaxie comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures |