Cargando…

Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jun, Li, Hao, Yu, Junfeng, Zhan, Jisen, Zhang, Xinzhong, Xu, Yunfeng, Yao, Dasheng, Tian, Jia, Xie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05769-w
_version_ 1784778572929433600
author Jun, Li
Hao, Yu
Junfeng, Zhan
Jisen, Zhang
Xinzhong, Xu
Yunfeng, Yao
Dasheng, Tian
Jia, Xie
author_facet Jun, Li
Hao, Yu
Junfeng, Zhan
Jisen, Zhang
Xinzhong, Xu
Yunfeng, Yao
Dasheng, Tian
Jia, Xie
author_sort Jun, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision (M-G/MISI) with the modified suture technique (MST). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 2012 and January 2020 at our hospital. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were statistically analyzed to compare the treatment efficacy of the two operative methods. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study, 34 of whom underwent M-G/MISI treatment, and 33 of whom underwent MST treatment. The intraoperative blood loss in the M-G/MISI group (16.47 ± 13.23 ml) was significantly lower than that in the MST group (34.55 ± 13.01 ml), and the difference was statistically significant (P ˂0.001). The incision in the M-G/MISI group (3.79 ± 1.81 cm) was significantly shorter than that in the MST group (5.79 ± 1.00 cm), and the difference was statistically significant (P˂0.001). The Achilles tendon rupture score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were higher than those of the MST group at the sixth month after the operation (P˂0.001). Postoperatively, there was 1 case of traumatic Achilles tendon rupture in the M-G/MISI group and 1 case each of infection and deep vein thrombosis in the modified suture group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the MST group, the M-G/MISI group had better Achilles tendon and ankle function scores at 6 months postoperatively, and less bleeding and shorter incisions. M-G/MISI is less invasive than MST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9425948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94259482022-08-31 Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures Jun, Li Hao, Yu Junfeng, Zhan Jisen, Zhang Xinzhong, Xu Yunfeng, Yao Dasheng, Tian Jia, Xie BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision (M-G/MISI) with the modified suture technique (MST). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 2012 and January 2020 at our hospital. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were statistically analyzed to compare the treatment efficacy of the two operative methods. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study, 34 of whom underwent M-G/MISI treatment, and 33 of whom underwent MST treatment. The intraoperative blood loss in the M-G/MISI group (16.47 ± 13.23 ml) was significantly lower than that in the MST group (34.55 ± 13.01 ml), and the difference was statistically significant (P ˂0.001). The incision in the M-G/MISI group (3.79 ± 1.81 cm) was significantly shorter than that in the MST group (5.79 ± 1.00 cm), and the difference was statistically significant (P˂0.001). The Achilles tendon rupture score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were higher than those of the MST group at the sixth month after the operation (P˂0.001). Postoperatively, there was 1 case of traumatic Achilles tendon rupture in the M-G/MISI group and 1 case each of infection and deep vein thrombosis in the modified suture group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the MST group, the M-G/MISI group had better Achilles tendon and ankle function scores at 6 months postoperatively, and less bleeding and shorter incisions. M-G/MISI is less invasive than MST. BioMed Central 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9425948/ /pubmed/36042433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05769-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jun, Li
Hao, Yu
Junfeng, Zhan
Jisen, Zhang
Xinzhong, Xu
Yunfeng, Yao
Dasheng, Tian
Jia, Xie
Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
title Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
title_full Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
title_fullStr Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
title_short Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
title_sort comparison of ma-griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05769-w
work_keys_str_mv AT junli comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT haoyu comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT junfengzhan comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT jisenzhang comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT xinzhongxu comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT yunfengyao comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT dashengtian comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures
AT jiaxie comparisonofmagriffithcombinedwithaminimallyinvasivesmallincisiontoamodifiedsuturetechniqueforthetreatmentofacuteachillestendonruptures