Cargando…

Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and biometric characteristics of children presenting with nanophthalmos (NO group) with that of age-matched controls (CO group). METHODS: Electronic medical records of 40 children (<18 years of age) with diagnosis of nanophthalmos (NO), presented to a tertiary cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajendrababu, Sharmila, Vaishali, Venkatraman, Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A, Ramesh, Sujitha, Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791127
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2880_21
_version_ 1784778631524909056
author Rajendrababu, Sharmila
Vaishali, Venkatraman
Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A
Ramesh, Sujitha
Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
author_facet Rajendrababu, Sharmila
Vaishali, Venkatraman
Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A
Ramesh, Sujitha
Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
author_sort Rajendrababu, Sharmila
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and biometric characteristics of children presenting with nanophthalmos (NO group) with that of age-matched controls (CO group). METHODS: Electronic medical records of 40 children (<18 years of age) with diagnosis of nanophthalmos (NO), presented to a tertiary center in Tamil Nadu between January 2010 and December 2019, were reviewed and compared with 30 age-matched controls (CO) presenting for routine eye examination between October 2019 and December 2019. Clinical parameters compared were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length (AxL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), retinochoroidal scleral thickness (RCS), corneal diameter, central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP), lens axial length factor (LAF), and lens thickness/anterior chamber depth ratio (LT/ACD). RESULTS: Mean age of the NO group was 8.95 ± 4.0 years. Mean spherical equivalent (SE) in NO group was 10.87 ± 3.1 D and was inversely correlated to AxL (r = −0.46, P value = 0.003). All biometric parameters (AxL, ACD, LT, RCS, LAF, and LT/ACD), except CCT were significantly different between NO and CO groups. NO group children had 52.5% visual impairment with BCVA ≤ 6/24 and 17.5% had esotropia. Common ocular associations in NO group were amblyopia (64.3%), primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) (17.8%), pigmentary retinopathy (14.3%), and retinal detachment (3.6%). Angle-closure disease was seen in 50% of NO group and 30% underwent laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). There was a significant difference in SE, ACD, and LAF among NO children with AxL <17 mm or >17 mm. Multivariable regression analysis revealed a significant correlation of SE and ACD with AxL. CONCLUSION: Nanophthalmos in children often present as amblyopia with visual impairment and strabismus. NO group with AxL <17 mm, had angle-closure disease as a common association with significantly lower ACD, higher SE, and LAF. All morphometric characteristics, except CCT, were significantly different between NO and CO groups. Close monitoring with serial biometry in NO group is needed for the timely diagnosis and prompt intervention to avoid visual impairment, due to glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9426193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94261932022-08-31 Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls Rajendrababu, Sharmila Vaishali, Venkatraman Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A Ramesh, Sujitha Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and biometric characteristics of children presenting with nanophthalmos (NO group) with that of age-matched controls (CO group). METHODS: Electronic medical records of 40 children (<18 years of age) with diagnosis of nanophthalmos (NO), presented to a tertiary center in Tamil Nadu between January 2010 and December 2019, were reviewed and compared with 30 age-matched controls (CO) presenting for routine eye examination between October 2019 and December 2019. Clinical parameters compared were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length (AxL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), retinochoroidal scleral thickness (RCS), corneal diameter, central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP), lens axial length factor (LAF), and lens thickness/anterior chamber depth ratio (LT/ACD). RESULTS: Mean age of the NO group was 8.95 ± 4.0 years. Mean spherical equivalent (SE) in NO group was 10.87 ± 3.1 D and was inversely correlated to AxL (r = −0.46, P value = 0.003). All biometric parameters (AxL, ACD, LT, RCS, LAF, and LT/ACD), except CCT were significantly different between NO and CO groups. NO group children had 52.5% visual impairment with BCVA ≤ 6/24 and 17.5% had esotropia. Common ocular associations in NO group were amblyopia (64.3%), primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) (17.8%), pigmentary retinopathy (14.3%), and retinal detachment (3.6%). Angle-closure disease was seen in 50% of NO group and 30% underwent laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). There was a significant difference in SE, ACD, and LAF among NO children with AxL <17 mm or >17 mm. Multivariable regression analysis revealed a significant correlation of SE and ACD with AxL. CONCLUSION: Nanophthalmos in children often present as amblyopia with visual impairment and strabismus. NO group with AxL <17 mm, had angle-closure disease as a common association with significantly lower ACD, higher SE, and LAF. All morphometric characteristics, except CCT, were significantly different between NO and CO groups. Close monitoring with serial biometry in NO group is needed for the timely diagnosis and prompt intervention to avoid visual impairment, due to glaucoma. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9426193/ /pubmed/35791127 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2880_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajendrababu, Sharmila
Vaishali, Venkatraman
Senthilkumar, Vijayalakshmi A
Ramesh, Sujitha
Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
title Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
title_full Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
title_short Comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
title_sort comparison of clinical and biometric characteristics between nanophthalmic children and age-matched controls
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791127
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2880_21
work_keys_str_mv AT rajendrababusharmila comparisonofclinicalandbiometriccharacteristicsbetweennanophthalmicchildrenandagematchedcontrols
AT vaishalivenkatraman comparisonofclinicalandbiometriccharacteristicsbetweennanophthalmicchildrenandagematchedcontrols
AT senthilkumarvijayalakshmia comparisonofclinicalandbiometriccharacteristicsbetweennanophthalmicchildrenandagematchedcontrols
AT rameshsujitha comparisonofclinicalandbiometriccharacteristicsbetweennanophthalmicchildrenandagematchedcontrols
AT udumanmohammedsithiq comparisonofclinicalandbiometriccharacteristicsbetweennanophthalmicchildrenandagematchedcontrols