Cargando…
Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions
Fitness benefits from division of labor are well documented in microbial consortia, but the dependency of the benefits on environmental context is poorly understood. Two synthetic Escherichia coli consortia were built to test the relationships between exchanged organic acid, local environment, and o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00051-22 |
_version_ | 1784778709423620096 |
---|---|
author | Beck, Ashley E. Pintar, Kathryn Schepens, Diana Schrammeck, Ashley Johnson, Timothy Bleem, Alissa Du, Martina Harcombe, William R. Bernstein, Hans C. Heys, Jeffrey J. Gedeon, Tomas Carlson, Ross P. |
author_facet | Beck, Ashley E. Pintar, Kathryn Schepens, Diana Schrammeck, Ashley Johnson, Timothy Bleem, Alissa Du, Martina Harcombe, William R. Bernstein, Hans C. Heys, Jeffrey J. Gedeon, Tomas Carlson, Ross P. |
author_sort | Beck, Ashley E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fitness benefits from division of labor are well documented in microbial consortia, but the dependency of the benefits on environmental context is poorly understood. Two synthetic Escherichia coli consortia were built to test the relationships between exchanged organic acid, local environment, and opportunity costs of different metabolic strategies. Opportunity costs quantify benefits not realized due to selecting one phenotype over another. The consortia catabolized glucose and exchanged either acetic or lactic acid to create producer-consumer food webs. The organic acids had different inhibitory properties and different opportunity costs associated with their positions in central metabolism. The exchanged metabolites modulated different consortial dynamics. The acetic acid-exchanging (AAE) consortium had a “push” interaction motif where acetic acid was secreted faster by the producer than the consumer imported it, while the lactic acid-exchanging (LAE) consortium had a “pull” interaction motif where the consumer imported lactic acid at a comparable rate to its production. The LAE consortium outperformed wild-type (WT) batch cultures under the environmental context of weakly buffered conditions, achieving a 55% increase in biomass titer, a 51% increase in biomass per proton yield, an 86% increase in substrate conversion, and the complete elimination of by-product accumulation all relative to the WT. However, the LAE consortium had the trade-off of a 42% lower specific growth rate. The AAE consortium did not outperform the WT in any considered performance metric. Performance advantages of the LAE consortium were sensitive to environment; increasing the medium buffering capacity negated the performance advantages compared to WT. IMPORTANCE Most naturally occurring microorganisms persist in consortia where metabolic interactions are common and often essential to ecosystem function. This study uses synthetic ecology to test how different cellular interaction motifs influence performance properties of consortia. Environmental context ultimately controlled the division of labor performance as shifts from weakly buffered to highly buffered conditions negated the benefits of the strategy. Understanding the limits of division of labor advances our understanding of natural community functioning, which is central to nutrient cycling and provides design rules for assembling consortia used in applied bioprocessing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9426560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94265602022-08-31 Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions Beck, Ashley E. Pintar, Kathryn Schepens, Diana Schrammeck, Ashley Johnson, Timothy Bleem, Alissa Du, Martina Harcombe, William R. Bernstein, Hans C. Heys, Jeffrey J. Gedeon, Tomas Carlson, Ross P. mSystems Research Article Fitness benefits from division of labor are well documented in microbial consortia, but the dependency of the benefits on environmental context is poorly understood. Two synthetic Escherichia coli consortia were built to test the relationships between exchanged organic acid, local environment, and opportunity costs of different metabolic strategies. Opportunity costs quantify benefits not realized due to selecting one phenotype over another. The consortia catabolized glucose and exchanged either acetic or lactic acid to create producer-consumer food webs. The organic acids had different inhibitory properties and different opportunity costs associated with their positions in central metabolism. The exchanged metabolites modulated different consortial dynamics. The acetic acid-exchanging (AAE) consortium had a “push” interaction motif where acetic acid was secreted faster by the producer than the consumer imported it, while the lactic acid-exchanging (LAE) consortium had a “pull” interaction motif where the consumer imported lactic acid at a comparable rate to its production. The LAE consortium outperformed wild-type (WT) batch cultures under the environmental context of weakly buffered conditions, achieving a 55% increase in biomass titer, a 51% increase in biomass per proton yield, an 86% increase in substrate conversion, and the complete elimination of by-product accumulation all relative to the WT. However, the LAE consortium had the trade-off of a 42% lower specific growth rate. The AAE consortium did not outperform the WT in any considered performance metric. Performance advantages of the LAE consortium were sensitive to environment; increasing the medium buffering capacity negated the performance advantages compared to WT. IMPORTANCE Most naturally occurring microorganisms persist in consortia where metabolic interactions are common and often essential to ecosystem function. This study uses synthetic ecology to test how different cellular interaction motifs influence performance properties of consortia. Environmental context ultimately controlled the division of labor performance as shifts from weakly buffered to highly buffered conditions negated the benefits of the strategy. Understanding the limits of division of labor advances our understanding of natural community functioning, which is central to nutrient cycling and provides design rules for assembling consortia used in applied bioprocessing. American Society for Microbiology 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9426560/ /pubmed/35762764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00051-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Beck et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Beck, Ashley E. Pintar, Kathryn Schepens, Diana Schrammeck, Ashley Johnson, Timothy Bleem, Alissa Du, Martina Harcombe, William R. Bernstein, Hans C. Heys, Jeffrey J. Gedeon, Tomas Carlson, Ross P. Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions |
title | Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions |
title_full | Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions |
title_fullStr | Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions |
title_short | Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions |
title_sort | environment constrains fitness advantages of division of labor in microbial consortia engineered for metabolite push or pull interactions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00051-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckashleye environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT pintarkathryn environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT schepensdiana environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT schrammeckashley environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT johnsontimothy environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT bleemalissa environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT dumartina environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT harcombewilliamr environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT bernsteinhansc environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT heysjeffreyj environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT gedeontomas environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions AT carlsonrossp environmentconstrainsfitnessadvantagesofdivisionoflaborinmicrobialconsortiaengineeredformetabolitepushorpullinteractions |