Cargando…

Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study

INTRODUCTION: The midface with multiple bones and cavities is vulnerable to fractures more commonly. Midface is one of the most frequently injured areas of the body, accounting for 23%–97% of all facial fractures. The classic LeFort type of fractures are uncommon nowadays and a more common picture i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shivakotee, Satyapriya, Menon, Suresh, Sham, M. E., Kumar, Veerendra, Archana, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_378_21
_version_ 1784778738495389696
author Shivakotee, Satyapriya
Menon, Suresh
Sham, M. E.
Kumar, Veerendra
Archana, S.
author_facet Shivakotee, Satyapriya
Menon, Suresh
Sham, M. E.
Kumar, Veerendra
Archana, S.
author_sort Shivakotee, Satyapriya
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The midface with multiple bones and cavities is vulnerable to fractures more commonly. Midface is one of the most frequently injured areas of the body, accounting for 23%–97% of all facial fractures. The classic LeFort type of fractures are uncommon nowadays and a more common picture is more severe forms primarily due to the high-speed vehicles that are a major cause of these fractures. It, therefore, has become imperative to determine the commonly occurring patterns of fractures in this area in the present time for a better insight into diagnosis and treatment plans. The aim of this article was to determine fracture patterns in midface trauma to ease the treatment planning in such a scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 114 patients who reported to a tertiary hospital during a 4-year period and were diagnosed with suspected midface fractures. The etiology and pattern of fractures of midface were assessed based on history, clinical examination, and imaging data. The diagnosis of a fracture was based on the clinical history, signs and symptoms, manual examination, and correct interpretation of radiographs and computed tomography. Midface fractures were recorded as LeFort I, II, III, dentoalveolar, palatal, zygomatic complex fracture, nasal bones, naso-orbital-ethmoidal complex, and orbital and zygomatic arch fractures. Etiological factors were classified as road traffic accidents (RTAs), fall, assault, and sports injuries. RESULTS: During the 4-year period, a total of 114 patients were included. Patients' ages ranged from 17 to 68 years, with 102 males and 12 females. The most common fracture in this study was found to be zygomatic complex fractures (52%), and RTA was identified as the main cause of fracture in this study (79.2%). CONCLUSION: The midface fractures are more common in males due to the propensity of males to use two-wheelers more than females. The prominence of the zygoma makes it more vulnerable to fractures than rest of the bones in the midface. Increased speed of vehicles and lack of discipline in following traffic rules have resulted in RTA, being the biggest etiological factor in midface injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9426697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94266972022-08-31 Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study Shivakotee, Satyapriya Menon, Suresh Sham, M. E. Kumar, Veerendra Archana, S. Natl J Maxillofac Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: The midface with multiple bones and cavities is vulnerable to fractures more commonly. Midface is one of the most frequently injured areas of the body, accounting for 23%–97% of all facial fractures. The classic LeFort type of fractures are uncommon nowadays and a more common picture is more severe forms primarily due to the high-speed vehicles that are a major cause of these fractures. It, therefore, has become imperative to determine the commonly occurring patterns of fractures in this area in the present time for a better insight into diagnosis and treatment plans. The aim of this article was to determine fracture patterns in midface trauma to ease the treatment planning in such a scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 114 patients who reported to a tertiary hospital during a 4-year period and were diagnosed with suspected midface fractures. The etiology and pattern of fractures of midface were assessed based on history, clinical examination, and imaging data. The diagnosis of a fracture was based on the clinical history, signs and symptoms, manual examination, and correct interpretation of radiographs and computed tomography. Midface fractures were recorded as LeFort I, II, III, dentoalveolar, palatal, zygomatic complex fracture, nasal bones, naso-orbital-ethmoidal complex, and orbital and zygomatic arch fractures. Etiological factors were classified as road traffic accidents (RTAs), fall, assault, and sports injuries. RESULTS: During the 4-year period, a total of 114 patients were included. Patients' ages ranged from 17 to 68 years, with 102 males and 12 females. The most common fracture in this study was found to be zygomatic complex fractures (52%), and RTA was identified as the main cause of fracture in this study (79.2%). CONCLUSION: The midface fractures are more common in males due to the propensity of males to use two-wheelers more than females. The prominence of the zygoma makes it more vulnerable to fractures than rest of the bones in the midface. Increased speed of vehicles and lack of discipline in following traffic rules have resulted in RTA, being the biggest etiological factor in midface injuries. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9426697/ /pubmed/36051786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_378_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shivakotee, Satyapriya
Menon, Suresh
Sham, M. E.
Kumar, Veerendra
Archana, S.
Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study
title Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study
title_full Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study
title_fullStr Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study
title_short Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study
title_sort midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – a prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_378_21
work_keys_str_mv AT shivakoteesatyapriya midfacefracturepatterninatertiarycarehospitalaprospectivestudy
AT menonsuresh midfacefracturepatterninatertiarycarehospitalaprospectivestudy
AT shamme midfacefracturepatterninatertiarycarehospitalaprospectivestudy
AT kumarveerendra midfacefracturepatterninatertiarycarehospitalaprospectivestudy
AT archanas midfacefracturepatterninatertiarycarehospitalaprospectivestudy