Cargando…
Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students’ knowledge, skill scores, learnin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36040919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273693 |
_version_ | 1784778781441916928 |
---|---|
author | Ni, Jinhui Wu, Pei Huang, Xinlin Zhang, Fangfang You, Ze Chang, Qiaoling Liao, Li |
author_facet | Ni, Jinhui Wu, Pei Huang, Xinlin Zhang, Fangfang You, Ze Chang, Qiaoling Liao, Li |
author_sort | Ni, Jinhui |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students’ knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients’ satisfaction. METHODS: We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2021120040. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9426898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94268982022-08-31 Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis Ni, Jinhui Wu, Pei Huang, Xinlin Zhang, Fangfang You, Ze Chang, Qiaoling Liao, Li PLoS One Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students’ knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients’ satisfaction. METHODS: We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2021120040. Public Library of Science 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9426898/ /pubmed/36040919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273693 Text en © 2022 Ni et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ni, Jinhui Wu, Pei Huang, Xinlin Zhang, Fangfang You, Ze Chang, Qiaoling Liao, Li Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36040919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nijinhui effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wupei effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT huangxinlin effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangfangfang effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT youze effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT changqiaoling effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liaoli effectsoffiveteachingmethodsinclinicalnursingteachingaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |