Cargando…

The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice

Prior studies suggest that clinical trials are often hampered by problems in design, conduct, and reporting that limit their uptake in clinical practice. We have described ‘informativeness’ as the ability of a trial to guide clinical, policy, or research decisions. Little is known about the proporti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hutchinson, Nora, Moyer, Hannah, Zarin, Deborah A, Kimmelman, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975784
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79491
_version_ 1784778822948749312
author Hutchinson, Nora
Moyer, Hannah
Zarin, Deborah A
Kimmelman, Jonathan
author_facet Hutchinson, Nora
Moyer, Hannah
Zarin, Deborah A
Kimmelman, Jonathan
author_sort Hutchinson, Nora
collection PubMed
description Prior studies suggest that clinical trials are often hampered by problems in design, conduct, and reporting that limit their uptake in clinical practice. We have described ‘informativeness’ as the ability of a trial to guide clinical, policy, or research decisions. Little is known about the proportion of initiated trials that inform clinical practice. We created a cohort of randomized interventional clinical trials in three disease areas (ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and lung cancer) that were initiated between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 using ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted inclusion to trials aimed at answering a clinical question related to the treatment or prevention of disease. Our primary outcome was the proportion of clinical trials fulfilling four conditions of informativeness: importance of the clinical question, trial design, feasibility, and reporting of results. Our study included 125 clinical trials. The proportion meeting four conditions for informativeness was 26.4% (95% CI 18.9–35.0). Sixty-seven percent of participants were enrolled in informative trials. The proportion of informative trials did not differ significantly between our three disease areas. Our results suggest that the majority of randomized interventional trials designed to guide clinical practice possess features that may compromise their ability to do so. This highlights opportunities to improve the scientific vetting of clinical research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9427100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94271002022-08-31 The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice Hutchinson, Nora Moyer, Hannah Zarin, Deborah A Kimmelman, Jonathan eLife Medicine Prior studies suggest that clinical trials are often hampered by problems in design, conduct, and reporting that limit their uptake in clinical practice. We have described ‘informativeness’ as the ability of a trial to guide clinical, policy, or research decisions. Little is known about the proportion of initiated trials that inform clinical practice. We created a cohort of randomized interventional clinical trials in three disease areas (ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and lung cancer) that were initiated between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 using ClinicalTrials.gov. We restricted inclusion to trials aimed at answering a clinical question related to the treatment or prevention of disease. Our primary outcome was the proportion of clinical trials fulfilling four conditions of informativeness: importance of the clinical question, trial design, feasibility, and reporting of results. Our study included 125 clinical trials. The proportion meeting four conditions for informativeness was 26.4% (95% CI 18.9–35.0). Sixty-seven percent of participants were enrolled in informative trials. The proportion of informative trials did not differ significantly between our three disease areas. Our results suggest that the majority of randomized interventional trials designed to guide clinical practice possess features that may compromise their ability to do so. This highlights opportunities to improve the scientific vetting of clinical research. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9427100/ /pubmed/35975784 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79491 Text en © 2022, Hutchinson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medicine
Hutchinson, Nora
Moyer, Hannah
Zarin, Deborah A
Kimmelman, Jonathan
The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
title The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
title_full The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
title_fullStr The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
title_short The proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
title_sort proportion of randomized controlled trials that inform clinical practice
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975784
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79491
work_keys_str_mv AT hutchinsonnora theproportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT moyerhannah theproportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT zarindeboraha theproportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT kimmelmanjonathan theproportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT hutchinsonnora proportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT moyerhannah proportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT zarindeboraha proportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice
AT kimmelmanjonathan proportionofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatinformclinicalpractice