Cargando…

Impact of COVID-19 on the patient referral pattern and conversion rate in the university versus private facial plastic surgery centers

PURPOSE: To compare the number of referrals and conversion rate between the pandemic and pre-pandemic period. METHODS: The number of referrals and conversion rate between the 10-month pandemic (March–December 2020) and pre-pandemic (March–December 2019) were evaluated in the two university (mainly n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdolalizadeh, Parya, Kashkouli, Mohsen Bahmani, Jafarpour, Soheila, Rezaei, Saeid, Ghanbari, Shaghayegh, Akbarian, Shadi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02469-1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare the number of referrals and conversion rate between the pandemic and pre-pandemic period. METHODS: The number of referrals and conversion rate between the 10-month pandemic (March–December 2020) and pre-pandemic (March–December 2019) were evaluated in the two university (mainly non-cosmetic) and private (mainly cosmetic) facial plastic surgery centers. Demographics and monthly number and type (cosmetic and non-cosmetic) of the referrals and surgeries were recorded from the both and cosmetic facial injections (botulinum toxin and filler) and the source of referrals (web- and non-web-based) from the private center. The conversion rate was a ratio of the number of the surgeries to the number of referrals. RESULTS: The number of referrals declined by 7.7% in the private center which was significantly higher for the non-cosmetic (26%) than the cosmetic (0.5%) referrals. It was 32% in the university center. The private center conversion rate significantly (P < 0.001) decreased for both the cosmetic (60%) and non-cosmetic (82%) procedures. It was not significantly different between the cosmetic (65%) and non-cosmetic (58%) procedures in the university center. However, the number of cosmetic facial injections (11%) and the web-based referral source (4%) increased. The recovery was better for the number of referrals (better in the private center) than the conversion rate. CONCLUSION: The fall in the conversion rate was statistically significant in the private center. While the number of referrals recovered to almost the pre-pandemic level, the conversion rates, despite recovery, remained at a lower level at the end. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02469-1.