Cargando…

Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples

BACKGROUND: Several in-house PCR-based assays have been described for the detection of bacterial meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae from clinical samples. PCR-based methods targeting different bacterial genes are frequently used by diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Filippis, Ivano, de Andrade, Claudia Ferreira, Caldeira, Nathalia, de Azevedo, Aline Carvalho, de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27256956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.005
_version_ 1784778951136116736
author de Filippis, Ivano
de Andrade, Claudia Ferreira
Caldeira, Nathalia
de Azevedo, Aline Carvalho
de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio
author_facet de Filippis, Ivano
de Andrade, Claudia Ferreira
Caldeira, Nathalia
de Azevedo, Aline Carvalho
de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio
author_sort de Filippis, Ivano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several in-house PCR-based assays have been described for the detection of bacterial meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae from clinical samples. PCR-based methods targeting different bacterial genes are frequently used by different laboratories worldwide, but no standard method has ever been established. The aim of our study was to compare different in-house and a commercial PCR-based tests for the detection of bacterial pathogens causing meningitis and invasive disease in humans. METHODS: A total of 110 isolates and 134 clinical samples (99 cerebrospinal fluid and 35 blood samples) collected from suspected cases of invasive disease were analyzed. Specific sets of primers frequently used for PCR-diagnosis of the three pathogens were used and compared with the results achieved using the multiplex approach described here. Several different gene targets were used for each microorganism, namely ctrA, crgA and nspA for N. meningitidis, ply for S. pneumoniae, P6 and bexA for H. influenzae. RESULTS: All used methods were fast, specific and sensitive, while some of the targets used for the in-house PCR assay detected lower concentrations of genomic DNA than the commercial method. An additional PCR reaction is described for the differentiation of capsulated and non-capsulated H. influenzae strains, the while commercial method only detects capsulated strains. CONCLUSIONS: The in-house PCR methods here compared showed to be rapid, sensitive, highly specific, and cheaper than commercial methods. The in-house PCR methods could be easily adopted by public laboratories of developing countries for diagnostic purposes. The best results were achieved using primers targeting the genes nspA, ply, and P6 which were able to detect the lowest DNA concentrations for each specific target.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9427638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94276382022-09-01 Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples de Filippis, Ivano de Andrade, Claudia Ferreira Caldeira, Nathalia de Azevedo, Aline Carvalho de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio Braz J Infect Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Several in-house PCR-based assays have been described for the detection of bacterial meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae from clinical samples. PCR-based methods targeting different bacterial genes are frequently used by different laboratories worldwide, but no standard method has ever been established. The aim of our study was to compare different in-house and a commercial PCR-based tests for the detection of bacterial pathogens causing meningitis and invasive disease in humans. METHODS: A total of 110 isolates and 134 clinical samples (99 cerebrospinal fluid and 35 blood samples) collected from suspected cases of invasive disease were analyzed. Specific sets of primers frequently used for PCR-diagnosis of the three pathogens were used and compared with the results achieved using the multiplex approach described here. Several different gene targets were used for each microorganism, namely ctrA, crgA and nspA for N. meningitidis, ply for S. pneumoniae, P6 and bexA for H. influenzae. RESULTS: All used methods were fast, specific and sensitive, while some of the targets used for the in-house PCR assay detected lower concentrations of genomic DNA than the commercial method. An additional PCR reaction is described for the differentiation of capsulated and non-capsulated H. influenzae strains, the while commercial method only detects capsulated strains. CONCLUSIONS: The in-house PCR methods here compared showed to be rapid, sensitive, highly specific, and cheaper than commercial methods. The in-house PCR methods could be easily adopted by public laboratories of developing countries for diagnostic purposes. The best results were achieved using primers targeting the genes nspA, ply, and P6 which were able to detect the lowest DNA concentrations for each specific target. Elsevier 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9427638/ /pubmed/27256956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.005 Text en © 2016 Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
de Filippis, Ivano
de Andrade, Claudia Ferreira
Caldeira, Nathalia
de Azevedo, Aline Carvalho
de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio
Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
title Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
title_full Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
title_fullStr Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
title_short Comparison of PCR-based methods for the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
title_sort comparison of pcr-based methods for the simultaneous detection of neisseria meningitidis, haemophilus influenzae, and streptococcus pneumoniae in clinical samples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27256956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.005
work_keys_str_mv AT defilippisivano comparisonofpcrbasedmethodsforthesimultaneousdetectionofneisseriameningitidishaemophilusinfluenzaeandstreptococcuspneumoniaeinclinicalsamples
AT deandradeclaudiaferreira comparisonofpcrbasedmethodsforthesimultaneousdetectionofneisseriameningitidishaemophilusinfluenzaeandstreptococcuspneumoniaeinclinicalsamples
AT caldeiranathalia comparisonofpcrbasedmethodsforthesimultaneousdetectionofneisseriameningitidishaemophilusinfluenzaeandstreptococcuspneumoniaeinclinicalsamples
AT deazevedoalinecarvalho comparisonofpcrbasedmethodsforthesimultaneousdetectionofneisseriameningitidishaemophilusinfluenzaeandstreptococcuspneumoniaeinclinicalsamples
AT dealmeidaantonioeugenio comparisonofpcrbasedmethodsforthesimultaneousdetectionofneisseriameningitidishaemophilusinfluenzaeandstreptococcuspneumoniaeinclinicalsamples