Cargando…

Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing

Recent neurophysiological research suggests that slow cortical activity tracks hierarchical syntactic structure during online sentence processing. Here we tested an alternative hypothesis: electrophysiological activity peaks at constituent phrase as well as sentence frequencies reflect cortical trac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glushko, Anastasia, Poeppel, David, Steinhauer, Karsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18162-3
_version_ 1784778963388727296
author Glushko, Anastasia
Poeppel, David
Steinhauer, Karsten
author_facet Glushko, Anastasia
Poeppel, David
Steinhauer, Karsten
author_sort Glushko, Anastasia
collection PubMed
description Recent neurophysiological research suggests that slow cortical activity tracks hierarchical syntactic structure during online sentence processing. Here we tested an alternative hypothesis: electrophysiological activity peaks at constituent phrase as well as sentence frequencies reflect cortical tracking of overt or covert (implicit) prosodic grouping. Participants listened to series of sentences presented in three conditions while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. First, prosodic cues in the sentence materials were neutralized. We found an EEG spectral power peak elicited at a frequency that only ‘tagged’ covert, implicit prosodic change, but not any major syntactic constituents. In the second condition, participants listened to a series of sentences with overt prosodic grouping cues that either aligned or misaligned with the syntactic phrasing in the sentences (initial overt prosody trials). Following each overt prosody trial, participants were presented with a second series of sentences lacking overt prosodic cues (instructed prosody trial) and were instructed to imagine the prosodic contour present in the previous, overt prosody trial. The EEG responses reflected an interactive relationship between syntactic processing and prosodic tracking at the frequencies of syntactic constituents (sentences and phrases): alignment of syntax and prosody boosted EEG responses, whereas their misalignment had an opposite effect. This was true for both overt and imagined prosody conditions. We conclude that processing of both overt and covert prosody is reflected in the frequency-tagged neural responses at sentence constituent frequencies. These findings need to be incorporated in any account that aims to identify neural markers reflecting syntactic processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9427746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94277462022-09-01 Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing Glushko, Anastasia Poeppel, David Steinhauer, Karsten Sci Rep Article Recent neurophysiological research suggests that slow cortical activity tracks hierarchical syntactic structure during online sentence processing. Here we tested an alternative hypothesis: electrophysiological activity peaks at constituent phrase as well as sentence frequencies reflect cortical tracking of overt or covert (implicit) prosodic grouping. Participants listened to series of sentences presented in three conditions while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. First, prosodic cues in the sentence materials were neutralized. We found an EEG spectral power peak elicited at a frequency that only ‘tagged’ covert, implicit prosodic change, but not any major syntactic constituents. In the second condition, participants listened to a series of sentences with overt prosodic grouping cues that either aligned or misaligned with the syntactic phrasing in the sentences (initial overt prosody trials). Following each overt prosody trial, participants were presented with a second series of sentences lacking overt prosodic cues (instructed prosody trial) and were instructed to imagine the prosodic contour present in the previous, overt prosody trial. The EEG responses reflected an interactive relationship between syntactic processing and prosodic tracking at the frequencies of syntactic constituents (sentences and phrases): alignment of syntax and prosody boosted EEG responses, whereas their misalignment had an opposite effect. This was true for both overt and imagined prosody conditions. We conclude that processing of both overt and covert prosody is reflected in the frequency-tagged neural responses at sentence constituent frequencies. These findings need to be incorporated in any account that aims to identify neural markers reflecting syntactic processing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9427746/ /pubmed/36042220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18162-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Glushko, Anastasia
Poeppel, David
Steinhauer, Karsten
Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
title Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
title_full Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
title_fullStr Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
title_full_unstemmed Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
title_short Overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
title_sort overt and implicit prosody contribute to neurophysiological responses previously attributed to grammatical processing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18162-3
work_keys_str_mv AT glushkoanastasia overtandimplicitprosodycontributetoneurophysiologicalresponsespreviouslyattributedtogrammaticalprocessing
AT poeppeldavid overtandimplicitprosodycontributetoneurophysiologicalresponsespreviouslyattributedtogrammaticalprocessing
AT steinhauerkarsten overtandimplicitprosodycontributetoneurophysiologicalresponsespreviouslyattributedtogrammaticalprocessing