Cargando…

Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?

PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MR-TB) has emerged to the biopsy technique of choice for evaluation of patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCA). The study aimed to determine expected and experienced pain during MR-TB depending on patients’ ps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krausewitz, Philipp, Schmeller, Helene, Luetkens, Julian, Dabir, Darius, Ellinger, Jörg, Ritter, Manuel, Conrad, Rupert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04083-3
_version_ 1784778991472738304
author Krausewitz, Philipp
Schmeller, Helene
Luetkens, Julian
Dabir, Darius
Ellinger, Jörg
Ritter, Manuel
Conrad, Rupert
author_facet Krausewitz, Philipp
Schmeller, Helene
Luetkens, Julian
Dabir, Darius
Ellinger, Jörg
Ritter, Manuel
Conrad, Rupert
author_sort Krausewitz, Philipp
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MR-TB) has emerged to the biopsy technique of choice for evaluation of patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCA). The study aimed to determine expected and experienced pain during MR-TB depending on patients’ psychological state. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 108 men with suspicion of PCA who underwent MR-TB. All patients completed self-reported validated questionnaires assessing pain, stress, self-efficacy, anxiety and study-specific questionnaires on expected and experienced pain before, during and after MR-TB. Patient characteristics and survey scores were obtained. RESULTS: Overall, pain levels during MR-TB were low (mean 2.8/10 ± 2.5 Numerical Rating Scale, NRS). 10/86 (11.6%) participants reported severe pain (≥ 7/10 NRS). Pain correlated significantly with anxiety (r = 0.42), stress (r = 0.22) and pain expectancy (r = 0.58). High self-efficacy did not show increased pain resilience. Participants anticipated more pain than experienced during each step of MR-TB with significant differences concerning local anesthesia and core sampling (both p < 0.001), among others. Expectancy and actual pain did not match regarding severity and impact of the total amount of cores taken (p < 0.05). Independent predictors of increased pain at biopsy were prostate volume > 50 ml (p = 0.0179) and expected pain during rectal manipulation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain during MR-TB can be positively influenced by reducing men’s anxiety, stress and pain expectancy. To meet the needs of the audience, clinicians should address concrete pain levels of each procedural step and consider special treatment for patients with prostate volume > 50 ml and men reporting on increased rectal sensitivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04083-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9427866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94278662022-09-01 Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy? Krausewitz, Philipp Schmeller, Helene Luetkens, Julian Dabir, Darius Ellinger, Jörg Ritter, Manuel Conrad, Rupert World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MR-TB) has emerged to the biopsy technique of choice for evaluation of patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCA). The study aimed to determine expected and experienced pain during MR-TB depending on patients’ psychological state. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 108 men with suspicion of PCA who underwent MR-TB. All patients completed self-reported validated questionnaires assessing pain, stress, self-efficacy, anxiety and study-specific questionnaires on expected and experienced pain before, during and after MR-TB. Patient characteristics and survey scores were obtained. RESULTS: Overall, pain levels during MR-TB were low (mean 2.8/10 ± 2.5 Numerical Rating Scale, NRS). 10/86 (11.6%) participants reported severe pain (≥ 7/10 NRS). Pain correlated significantly with anxiety (r = 0.42), stress (r = 0.22) and pain expectancy (r = 0.58). High self-efficacy did not show increased pain resilience. Participants anticipated more pain than experienced during each step of MR-TB with significant differences concerning local anesthesia and core sampling (both p < 0.001), among others. Expectancy and actual pain did not match regarding severity and impact of the total amount of cores taken (p < 0.05). Independent predictors of increased pain at biopsy were prostate volume > 50 ml (p = 0.0179) and expected pain during rectal manipulation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain during MR-TB can be positively influenced by reducing men’s anxiety, stress and pain expectancy. To meet the needs of the audience, clinicians should address concrete pain levels of each procedural step and consider special treatment for patients with prostate volume > 50 ml and men reporting on increased rectal sensitivity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04083-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9427866/ /pubmed/35833972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04083-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Krausewitz, Philipp
Schmeller, Helene
Luetkens, Julian
Dabir, Darius
Ellinger, Jörg
Ritter, Manuel
Conrad, Rupert
Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
title Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
title_full Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
title_fullStr Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
title_full_unstemmed Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
title_short Prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during MR-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
title_sort prospective analysis of pain expectancy and experience during mr-fusion prostate biopsy: does reality match patients’ expectancy?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04083-3
work_keys_str_mv AT krausewitzphilipp prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy
AT schmellerhelene prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy
AT luetkensjulian prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy
AT dabirdarius prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy
AT ellingerjorg prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy
AT rittermanuel prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy
AT conradrupert prospectiveanalysisofpainexpectancyandexperienceduringmrfusionprostatebiopsydoesrealitymatchpatientsexpectancy