Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ralphsmith, Maisie, Ahern, Susannah, Dean, Joanne, Ruseckaite, Rasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
_version_ 1784778999090642944
author Ralphsmith, Maisie
Ahern, Susannah
Dean, Joanne
Ruseckaite, Rasa
author_facet Ralphsmith, Maisie
Ahern, Susannah
Dean, Joanne
Ruseckaite, Rasa
author_sort Ralphsmith, Maisie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. METHODS: We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9427903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94279032022-09-01 Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review Ralphsmith, Maisie Ahern, Susannah Dean, Joanne Ruseckaite, Rasa Int Urogynecol J Review Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. METHODS: We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9427903/ /pubmed/35233681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Ralphsmith, Maisie
Ahern, Susannah
Dean, Joanne
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
title Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphsmithmaisie patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpaininwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersasystematicreview
AT ahernsusannah patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpaininwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersasystematicreview
AT deanjoanne patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpaininwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersasystematicreview
AT ruseckaiterasa patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpaininwomenwithpelvicfloordisordersasystematicreview