Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery

The idea of laser surgery is nearly as old as the laser itself. From the first trials to modern laser surgery systems, it was and is the aim to selectively cut the tissue in the focus spot without causing harm to surrounding structures. This is only possible when the correct parameters for the surgi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hohmann, Martin, Kühn, David, Späth, Moritz, Rohde, Max, Stelzle, Florian, Klämpfl, Florian, Schmidt, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18969-0
_version_ 1784779011236298752
author Hohmann, Martin
Kühn, David
Späth, Moritz
Rohde, Max
Stelzle, Florian
Klämpfl, Florian
Schmidt, Michael
author_facet Hohmann, Martin
Kühn, David
Späth, Moritz
Rohde, Max
Stelzle, Florian
Klämpfl, Florian
Schmidt, Michael
author_sort Hohmann, Martin
collection PubMed
description The idea of laser surgery is nearly as old as the laser itself. From the first trials to modern laser surgery systems, it was and is the aim to selectively cut the tissue in the focus spot without causing harm to surrounding structures. This is only possible when the correct parameters for the surgical laser are chosen. Usually, this is done by parameter studies. However, the concrete evaluation scheme often differs between groups and more precise approaches require staining and microscopic evaluation. To overcome these issues, a macroscopic scoring system is presented and evaluated. It can be shown that the scoring system works well and, thus, a laser cut can be evaluated within a few seconds. At the same time, the whole cutting front is taken into account. The presented scoring system is evaluated by the intra class correlation (ICC). The final agreement between different raters is more than 0.7. Therefore, the scoring system can be used to optimize and evaluate the cutting process and it should be suitable for comparing the results between different groups. Definitely, it can be applied for scoring within a group to enable e.g., a profound statistical analysis for a parameter study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9427958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94279582022-09-01 Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery Hohmann, Martin Kühn, David Späth, Moritz Rohde, Max Stelzle, Florian Klämpfl, Florian Schmidt, Michael Sci Rep Article The idea of laser surgery is nearly as old as the laser itself. From the first trials to modern laser surgery systems, it was and is the aim to selectively cut the tissue in the focus spot without causing harm to surrounding structures. This is only possible when the correct parameters for the surgical laser are chosen. Usually, this is done by parameter studies. However, the concrete evaluation scheme often differs between groups and more precise approaches require staining and microscopic evaluation. To overcome these issues, a macroscopic scoring system is presented and evaluated. It can be shown that the scoring system works well and, thus, a laser cut can be evaluated within a few seconds. At the same time, the whole cutting front is taken into account. The presented scoring system is evaluated by the intra class correlation (ICC). The final agreement between different raters is more than 0.7. Therefore, the scoring system can be used to optimize and evaluate the cutting process and it should be suitable for comparing the results between different groups. Definitely, it can be applied for scoring within a group to enable e.g., a profound statistical analysis for a parameter study. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9427958/ /pubmed/36042339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18969-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hohmann, Martin
Kühn, David
Späth, Moritz
Rohde, Max
Stelzle, Florian
Klämpfl, Florian
Schmidt, Michael
Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
title Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
title_full Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
title_short Development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
title_sort development and evaluation of a scoring system for assessing incisions in laser surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9427958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18969-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hohmannmartin developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery
AT kuhndavid developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery
AT spathmoritz developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery
AT rohdemax developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery
AT stelzleflorian developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery
AT klampflflorian developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery
AT schmidtmichael developmentandevaluationofascoringsystemforassessingincisionsinlasersurgery