Cargando…

Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer

PURPOSE: To dynamically assess the evolution of live birth predictive factors’ impact throughout the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, for each fresh and subsequent frozen embryo transfers. METHODS: In this multicentric study, data from 13,574 fresh IVF cycles and 6,770 subsequent frozen embryo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grzegorczyk-Martin, Véronika, Roset, Julie, Di Pizio, Pierre, Fréour, Thomas, Barrière, Paul, Pouly, Jean Luc, Grynberg, Michael, Parneix, Isabelle, Avril, Catherine, Pacheco, Joe, Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35767167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02547-4
_version_ 1784779036219670528
author Grzegorczyk-Martin, Véronika
Roset, Julie
Di Pizio, Pierre
Fréour, Thomas
Barrière, Paul
Pouly, Jean Luc
Grynberg, Michael
Parneix, Isabelle
Avril, Catherine
Pacheco, Joe
Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M.
author_facet Grzegorczyk-Martin, Véronika
Roset, Julie
Di Pizio, Pierre
Fréour, Thomas
Barrière, Paul
Pouly, Jean Luc
Grynberg, Michael
Parneix, Isabelle
Avril, Catherine
Pacheco, Joe
Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M.
author_sort Grzegorczyk-Martin, Véronika
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To dynamically assess the evolution of live birth predictive factors’ impact throughout the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, for each fresh and subsequent frozen embryo transfers. METHODS: In this multicentric study, data from 13,574 fresh IVF cycles and 6,770 subsequent frozen embryo transfers were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-seven descriptive parameters were included and split into four categories: (1) demographic (couple’s baseline characteristics), (2) ovarian stimulation, (3) laboratory data, and (4) embryo transfer (fresh and frozen). All these parameters were used to develop four successive predictive models with the outcome being a live birth event. RESULTS: Eight parameters were predictive of live birth in the first step after the first consultation, 9 in the second step after the stimulation, 11 in the third step with laboratory data, and 13 in the 4th step at the transfer stage. The predictive performance of the models increased at each step. Certain parameters remained predictive in all 4 models while others were predictive only in the first models and no longer in the subsequent ones when including new parameters. Moreover, some parameters were predictive in fresh transfers but not in frozen transfers. CONCLUSION: This work evaluates the chances of live birth for each embryo transfer individually and not the cumulative outcome after multiple IVF attempts. The different predictive models allow to determine which parameters should be taken into account or not at each step of an IVF cycle, and especially at the time of each embryo transfer, fresh or frozen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94280702022-09-01 Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer Grzegorczyk-Martin, Véronika Roset, Julie Di Pizio, Pierre Fréour, Thomas Barrière, Paul Pouly, Jean Luc Grynberg, Michael Parneix, Isabelle Avril, Catherine Pacheco, Joe Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M. J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: To dynamically assess the evolution of live birth predictive factors’ impact throughout the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, for each fresh and subsequent frozen embryo transfers. METHODS: In this multicentric study, data from 13,574 fresh IVF cycles and 6,770 subsequent frozen embryo transfers were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-seven descriptive parameters were included and split into four categories: (1) demographic (couple’s baseline characteristics), (2) ovarian stimulation, (3) laboratory data, and (4) embryo transfer (fresh and frozen). All these parameters were used to develop four successive predictive models with the outcome being a live birth event. RESULTS: Eight parameters were predictive of live birth in the first step after the first consultation, 9 in the second step after the stimulation, 11 in the third step with laboratory data, and 13 in the 4th step at the transfer stage. The predictive performance of the models increased at each step. Certain parameters remained predictive in all 4 models while others were predictive only in the first models and no longer in the subsequent ones when including new parameters. Moreover, some parameters were predictive in fresh transfers but not in frozen transfers. CONCLUSION: This work evaluates the chances of live birth for each embryo transfer individually and not the cumulative outcome after multiple IVF attempts. The different predictive models allow to determine which parameters should be taken into account or not at each step of an IVF cycle, and especially at the time of each embryo transfer, fresh or frozen. Springer US 2022-06-29 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9428070/ /pubmed/35767167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02547-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Grzegorczyk-Martin, Véronika
Roset, Julie
Di Pizio, Pierre
Fréour, Thomas
Barrière, Paul
Pouly, Jean Luc
Grynberg, Michael
Parneix, Isabelle
Avril, Catherine
Pacheco, Joe
Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M.
Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
title Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
title_full Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
title_fullStr Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
title_short Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
title_sort adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the ivf cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35767167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02547-4
work_keys_str_mv AT grzegorczykmartinveronika adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT rosetjulie adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT dipiziopierre adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT freourthomas adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT barrierepaul adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT poulyjeanluc adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT grynbergmichael adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT parneixisabelle adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT avrilcatherine adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT pachecojoe adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer
AT grzegorczyktomaszm adaptivedatadrivenmodelstobestpredictthelikelihoodoflivebirthastheivfcyclemovesonandforeachembryotransfer