Cargando…

Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites

This study is an investigation of weight fraction (wt%) and fiber feedstock length (FFSL) effects on the bearing strength (BS) of bolted joints in glass-fiber-reinforced (GFR) polypropylene (PP) composites manufactured by an injection molding technique. The investigation was made for holes produced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osama, M. M., Selmy, A. I., Abdelhaleem, Ayman M. M., Megahed, A. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18943-w
_version_ 1784779052599476224
author Osama, M. M.
Selmy, A. I.
Abdelhaleem, Ayman M. M.
Megahed, A. A.
author_facet Osama, M. M.
Selmy, A. I.
Abdelhaleem, Ayman M. M.
Megahed, A. A.
author_sort Osama, M. M.
collection PubMed
description This study is an investigation of weight fraction (wt%) and fiber feedstock length (FFSL) effects on the bearing strength (BS) of bolted joints in glass-fiber-reinforced (GFR) polypropylene (PP) composites manufactured by an injection molding technique. The investigation was made for holes produced either by molding or machining. For machined holes, the effect of drilling parameters (feed and speed) on BS was discussed. It is observed that BS decreased as FFSL increased. BS of both molded-in and drilled specimens was enhanced by increasing wt% of glass fiber. While slightly better BS was observed for molded-in specimens than drilled ones for all specimens. The drilling conditions’ effect on BS was found to be insignificant for drilled holes in long fibers reinforced PP, where the most significant factor was wt%. However, for short fibers reinforced PP, the spindle speed was the most significant factor followed by feed, while wt% has the lowest effect. Failure morphology mode for specimens indicates that for molded-in specimens, neat PP specimens failed under pure bearing mode while GFR/PP specimens failed under the mixed-mode failure (bearing and net tension). For machined specimens, all specimens failed under mixed-mode failure except for the highest wt% specimens which failed under net tension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9428170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94281702022-09-01 Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites Osama, M. M. Selmy, A. I. Abdelhaleem, Ayman M. M. Megahed, A. A. Sci Rep Article This study is an investigation of weight fraction (wt%) and fiber feedstock length (FFSL) effects on the bearing strength (BS) of bolted joints in glass-fiber-reinforced (GFR) polypropylene (PP) composites manufactured by an injection molding technique. The investigation was made for holes produced either by molding or machining. For machined holes, the effect of drilling parameters (feed and speed) on BS was discussed. It is observed that BS decreased as FFSL increased. BS of both molded-in and drilled specimens was enhanced by increasing wt% of glass fiber. While slightly better BS was observed for molded-in specimens than drilled ones for all specimens. The drilling conditions’ effect on BS was found to be insignificant for drilled holes in long fibers reinforced PP, where the most significant factor was wt%. However, for short fibers reinforced PP, the spindle speed was the most significant factor followed by feed, while wt% has the lowest effect. Failure morphology mode for specimens indicates that for molded-in specimens, neat PP specimens failed under pure bearing mode while GFR/PP specimens failed under the mixed-mode failure (bearing and net tension). For machined specimens, all specimens failed under mixed-mode failure except for the highest wt% specimens which failed under net tension. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9428170/ /pubmed/36042224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18943-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Osama, M. M.
Selmy, A. I.
Abdelhaleem, Ayman M. M.
Megahed, A. A.
Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites
title Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites
title_full Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites
title_fullStr Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites
title_short Comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of GFR/PP composites
title_sort comparison between bearing strengths of molded-in and machined holes of gfr/pp composites
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18943-w
work_keys_str_mv AT osamamm comparisonbetweenbearingstrengthsofmoldedinandmachinedholesofgfrppcomposites
AT selmyai comparisonbetweenbearingstrengthsofmoldedinandmachinedholesofgfrppcomposites
AT abdelhaleemaymanmm comparisonbetweenbearingstrengthsofmoldedinandmachinedholesofgfrppcomposites
AT megahedaa comparisonbetweenbearingstrengthsofmoldedinandmachinedholesofgfrppcomposites